The production of Asian theories of communication: Contexts and challenges

Asian Journal of Communication

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 453-468

  Dissanayake, Wimal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Agency; Buddhism; Eurocentrism; Orientalism; Postcolonial theory; Reductionism

Indexed keywords

EID: 75249100816     PISSN: 01292986     EISSN: 17420911     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01292980903293411     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Abu-Lughod, L. (2000). Modern subjects: Egyptian melodramas and politics of difference. In T. Mitchell (Ed.), Questions of modernity. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis Press.
2. Bhabha, H.K. (1986). The other question: Difference, discrimination and the discourse of colonialism. In F. Barker, P. Hulme, M. Iversen, & D. Loxley (Eds.), Literature, politics and theory (pp. 148-172). London: Methuen.
3. Bhabha, H.K. (1994). The location of culture. London: Routledge.
4. Chakrabarty, D. (2002). Habitations of modernity: Essays in the wake of subaltern studies. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
5. Chen, G.M. (1998). A Chinese model of human relationship development. In B.L. Hoffer & J.H. Koo (Eds.), Cross-cultural communication East and West in the 90s. San Antonio: Texas Institute for Cross-Cultural Research.
6. Cheng, C.V. (1983). Chinese philosophy in recent communication theory. Media Development, 30.
7. Chu, G.C. (1986). In search of Asian perspectives of communication theory. Media Asia, 13(1).
8. Chu, L.L. (1986). Mass communication theory: A Chinese perspective. Media Asia, 13(1).
9. Dissanayake, W. (1982). The phenomenology of verbal communication: A classical Indian view. Semiotica, 41(4).
10. Dissanayake, W. (1983a). Communication in the cultural traditions of India. Media Development, 30(1).
11. Dissanayake, W. (1983b). The communication significance of the Buddhist concept of dependent co-origination. Communication, 8(1).
12. Dissanayake, W. (1986). The need for the study of Asian approaches to communication. Media Asia, 13(1).
13. Dissanayake, W. (1988). Communication theory: The Asian perspective. Singapore: AMIC.
14. Dissanayake, W. (1989). Paradigm dialogue: An Europocentric universe of discourse. In B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J. O'Keefe, & W. Wartella (Eds.), Rethinking communication, Vol. 1, Paradigm issue. Newbury Park: Sage.
15. Garrett, M.M. (1991). Asian challenges. In S.K. Foss, K.A. Foss, & R. Trap (Eds.), Contemporary perspectives on rhetoric. Prospect Heights: Waveland Press.
16. Goonasekera, A., & Kuo, E.C.Y. (2000). Foreword. In A. Goonesekera & E.C.Y. Kuo (Eds.), Towards an Asian theory of communication. Asian Journal of Communication, 1 (92).
17. Guha, R. (1983). Elementary aspects of peasant insurgency in colonial India. New Delhi: Oxford University Press.
18. Ho, D.Y.F. (1998). Selfhood and identity in Confucianism, Taoism, Buddhism, and Hinduism. Journal for the Theory of Social Behavior, 25(2).
19. Ishii, S. (1984). Enryo-sasshi communication: A key to understanding Japanese interpersonal relations. Japan Review, 10.
20. Jensen, J.V. (1992). Values and practices in Asian argumentation. Argumentation and Advocacy, 28(4).
21. Kincaid, D.L. (1987). Communication theory: Eastern and Western perspectives. San Diego: Academic Press.
22. Miike, Y. (2002). Theorizing culture and communication in Asian contexts: An assumptive foundation. Intercultural Communication Studies, 11(1).
23. Miike, Y. (2003). Japanese enryo-sasshi communication and the psychology of amae: Reconsideration and reconceptualization. Keo Communication Review, 25.
24. Nordstrom, L. (1979). Zen and non-duality of communication. Communication, 4(1), 15-27.
25. Oliver, R.T. (1971). Communication and culture in ancient India and China. New York: Syracuse University Press.
26. Richie, D. (1971). Japanese cinema. New York: Anchor Books.
27. Ricoeur, P. (1976). Interpretation theory: Discourse and the surplus of meaning. Fort Worth: Texas Christian University Press.
28. Said, E. (1978). Orientalism. London: Routledge.
29. San Juan, E. (1998). Beyond postcolonial theory. New York: Martin Press.
30. Servaes, J. (2000). Reflections on the differences in Asian and European values and communication modes. Asian Journal of Communication, 10(2).
31. Spivak, G.C. (1996). Poststructuralism, marginality, postcoloniality and value. In P. Collins & H. Geyer-Ryan (Eds.), Literary theory today. Oxford: Polity.
32. Thayer, L. (1979). On the limits of Western communication theory. Communication, 4(1).
33. Wang, G., & Dissanayake, W., (Eds.). (1984). Continuity and change in communication systems: An Asian perspective. Norwood: Ablex.
34. Wang, G., & Shen, V. (2000). East West communication theory: Searching for the meaning of searching Asian theories. Asian Journal of Communication, 10(2).