Differences in public and private sector adoption of telemedicine: Indian case study for sectoral adoption

Studies in Health Technology and Informatics

Volumn 130, Issue , 2007, Pages 257-268

  Sood, Sanjay P ^a   Negash, Solomon ^b   Mbarika, Victor W A ^c   Kifle, Mengistu ^d   Prakash, Nupur ^e  

^a C DAC School of Advanced Computing   (Mauritius)

^b KENNESAW STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Southern Arkansas University   (United States)

^d STOCKHOLM UNIVERSITY   (Sweden)

^e GURU GOBIND SINGH INDRAPRASTHA UNIVERSITY   (India)

Author keywords

Developing Countries; Healthcare; India; Private Hospitals; Public Hospitals; Sectoral Adoption; Telemedicine

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING COUNTRIES; HEALTH CARE; HOSPITALS; MEDICAL EDUCATION;

AMERICAN TELEMEDICINE ASSOCIATIONS; CONSUMER HEALTH INFORMATION; HEALTHCARE SERVICES; INDIA; MEDICAL INFORMATION; PRIVATE HOSPITALS; PUBLIC AND PRIVATE SECTOR; SECTORAL ADOPTION;

TELEMEDICINE;

ARTICLE; HEALTH CARE DELIVERY; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMAN; INDIA; MASS COMMUNICATION; ORGANIZATION AND MANAGEMENT; TELEMEDICINE;

DELIVERY OF HEALTH CARE; DIFFUSION OF INNOVATION; HUMANS; INDIA; ORGANIZATIONAL CASE STUDIES; PRIVATE SECTOR; PUBLIC SECTOR; TELEMEDICINE;

EID: 75249098853     PISSN: 09269630     EISSN: 18798365     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Deng L., Poole M.S., Learning through Telemedicine Networks, Proceedings of the 36th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2003.
2. American Telemedicine Association.ATA News and Resources 2005.www.atmeda.org/news/ definition.htm.Retrieved September 30, 2006.
3. HRSA Survey Shows Promise and Challenge of Rural Telemedicine.Retrieved November 12, 2006 from http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/1997pres/970221a.html (Feb.21, 1997, HRSA Press Office).
4. Telemedicine and Developing Countries-Lessons Learned, Co-Rapporteur For Question 14/21.Telecommunication Development Bureau.ITU-D Study Groups, Document 2/116(Rev.1)-E, 30 August 2000.
5. International Telecommunication Union.Telecommunication Development Bureau.ITU-D Study Groups, Document 2/001-E 1998.
6. http://pda.healthnet.org/ retrieved 20th December, 2006.
7. ATA Telemedicine, Telehealth, and Health Information Technology: An American Telemedicine Association (ATA) Issue Paper, retreived November 12, 2006 from http://www.americantelemed.org/ news/policy-issues/HIT-Paper.pdf
8. Pal, A., Mbarika, V.W.A., Payton, F.C., Datta, P., and McCoy, S.(2005).Telemedicine diffusion in a developing country: The case of India.IEEE Transactions on Information Technology in Biomedicine, 9(1), pp.59-65.
9. ITU, World Telecommunication Development Report 2002.
10. CIA, The World Factbook, 2005.
11. Economic Survey, (2003).Economic Survey 2002-2003, Ministry of Finance, Government of India.
12. Sood, S.P., Bhatia, J.S.(2002).Making of Sanjeevani.First Annual Conference of Telemedicine Society of India, Lucknow, October 22-24, Telemed 2002.
13. Khandpur, R.S.and Sood, S.P.(2001).Training of health personnel on "telemedicine technology" (abstract).Technology and Health Care, 9(4), pp 318.
14. Bedi, B.S.(2006).Telemedicine in India: Initiative and Perspective.eHealth International Journal (online), October 29, 2003, http://ehealthinternational.org/pdfs/Bedi.pdf, accessed January 10, 2006.
15. Kumar, A., Manoj, G., and Rajan, B., (2005).OncoNET KERALA -A Paradigm for Cancer Follow-up (abstract).MedeTel, Luxembourg, April 2005.
16. Sood, S.P.(2002).India telemedicine venture seeks to improve care, increase access.TeleMedicine Today, pp 25-26, October 2002.
17. Bashshur, R.L., Teardon, T.G.and Shannon, G.W.(2000).Telemedicine: A new health care delivery system.Annual Review of Public Health, 21, Annual Reviews, Palo Alto, Calif., pp.613-637
18. Katzenstein, J.and Chrispin, B.(2005).T he Effect of Culture on the Design of a Telemedicine System in Tanzania.The fifth international conference on diversity in organizations, communities, and nations.June 30, Beijing City, China.