The desire to excavate Asian theories of communication: One strand of the history

Journal of Multicultural Discourses

Volumn 4, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 7-27

  Dissanayake, Wimal ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HAWAII   (United States)

Author keywords

Aesthetics; Communication; Epistemology; Linguistics; Metaphysics; Tradition

Indexed keywords

EID: 75249095862     PISSN: 17447143     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/17447140802651629     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Bateson, G. 1972. Steps to an ecology of the mind. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.
2. Brix, V.H. 1967. Cybernetics and everyday affairs. London: David Rendel.
3. Chen, G.-M. 2006. Asian communication studies: What and where to now. Review of Communication 6, no. 4: 295-311.
4. Chen, G.-M., and Y. Miike, eds. 2003. Asian approaches to human communication [Special issue]. Intercultural Communication Studies 12, no. 4: 1-218.
5. Chomsky, N. 1964a. A transformational approach to grammar. In The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language, ed. J.A. Fodor and J.J. Katz, 211-266. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
6. Chomsky, N. 1964b. Current issues in linguistic theory. In The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language, ed. J.A. Fodor and J.J. Katz, 50-119. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
7. Chomsky, N. 1964c. On the notion rule of grammar. In The structure of language: Readings in the philosophy of language, ed. J.A. Fodor and J.J. Katz, 119-137. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
8. Deutsch, E. 1975. Studies in comparative aesthetics. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.
9. Dissanayake, W. 1981. Towards Asian theories of communications. Communicator: A Journal of the Indian Institute of Mass Communication 16, no. 4: 13-8.
10. Dissanayake, W. 1982a. Personality, transpersonality and impersonality: Some reflections on the relationship of man to nature in three different cultures and its implications for communication theory. Asian Culture Quarterly 10, no. 1: 26-35.
11. Dissanayake, W. 1982b. The phenomenology of verbal communication: A classical Indian view. Semiotica 41, no. 1/4: 207-20.
12. Dissanayake, W. 1983a. Communication in the cultural tradition of India. Media Development 30, no. 1: 27-30.
13. Dissanayake, W. 1983b. Peace and communication: A Buddhist point of view. Media Development 30, no. 2: 7-9.
14. Dissanayake, W. 1983c. The communication significance of the Buddhist concept of dependent co-origination. Communication 8, no. 1: 29-45.
15. Dissanayake, W. 1986. The need for the study of Asian approaches to communication. Media Asia 13, no. 1: 6-13.
16. Dissanayake, W., ed. 1988. Communication theory: The Asian perspective. Singapore: Asian Mass Communication Research and Information Center.
17. Dissanayake, W. 1989. Paradigm dialogues: A Europocentric universe of discourse. In Rethinking communication: Vol. 1 Paradigm issues, ed. B. Dervin, L. Grossberg, B.J. O’Keefe, and E. Wartella, 166-168. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
18. Dissanayake, W. 2003. Asian approaches to human communication: Retrospect and prospect. Intercultural Communication Studies 12, no. 4: 17-37.
19. Dissanayake, W. 2006. Postcolonial theory and Asian communication theory: Toward a creative dialogue. China Media Research 2, no. 4: 1-8.
20. Dissanayake, W. 2007. Nagarjuna and modern communication theory. China Media Research 3, no. 4: 34-41.
21. Dissanayake, W. 2008. The idea of verbal communication in early Buddhism. China Media Research 4, no. 2: 69-76.
22. Ghosh, M. 1964. Natyasastra. Calcutta: Royal Asiatic Society.
23. Jespersen, O. 1949. The philosophy of grammar. New York: Norton.
24. Korzybski, A. 1948. Selections from science and sanity. Lakeville, CT: International Non-Aristotelian Library.
25. Matilal, B.K. 1971. Epistemology, logic and grammar in Indian philosophical analysis. The Hague: Mouton.
26. Miike, Y. 2006. Non-Western theory in Western research? An Asiacentric agenda for Asian communication studies. Review of Communication 6, no. 1/2: 4-31.
27. Miike, Y. 2007. An Asiacentric reflection on Eurocentric bias in communication theory. Communication Monographs 74, no. 2: 272-78.
28. Miike, Y., and G.-M. Chen, eds. 2007. Asian contributions to communication theory [Special issue]. China Media Research 3, no. 4: 1-109.
29. Pishroti, R. 1940. Dhvanyaloka. Benares: Visvavidyalaya Prakasana.
30. Putnam, H. 1981. Reason, truth and history. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Raja, K.K. 1963. Indian theories of meaning. Madras: Adayar Library.
32. Sastri, K.S. 1976. The highways of literary criticism in Sanskrit. Bombay: Longman.
33. Sharma, D. 1969. The differentiation theory of meaning in Indian logic. The Hague: Mouton.
34. Terwilliger, R.F. 1968. Meaning and mind. New York: Oxford University Press.