Automatic clustering of docking poses in virtual screening process using self-organizing map

Bioinformatics

Volumn 26, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 53-60

  Bouvier, Guillaume ^a   Evrard todeschi, Nathalie ^a   Girault, Jean Pierre ^a   Bertho, Gildas ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PARIS DESCARTES   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75249095132     PISSN: 13674803     EISSN: 14602059     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/btp623     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Alvarez, J. and Shoichet, B. (2005) Virtual Screening In Drug Discovery. CRC Press, Boca Raton, USA.
2. Chang, M. et al. (2007)Analysis of HIV wild-type and mutant structures via in silico docking against diverse ligand libraries. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 47, 1258-1262.
3. Chang, M. et al. (2008)Empirical entropic contributions in computational docking: evaluation in APS reductase complexes. J. Comput. Chem., 29, 1753-1761.
4. Deng, Z. et al. (2004) Structural interaction fingerprint (SIFt): a novel method for analyzing three-dimensional protein-ligand binding interactions. J. Med. Chem., 47, 337-344.
5. Evrard-Todeschi, N. et al. (2008) Structure of the complex between phosphorylated substrates and the SCF β-TrCP ubiquitin ligase receptor: a combined NMR, molecular modeling, and docking approach. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 2350-2361.
6. Hamelryck, T. and Manderick, B. (2003)PDB file parser and structure class implemented in Python. Bioinformatics, 19, 2308-2310.
7. Huey, R. et al. (2007) A semiempirical free energy force field with charge-based desolvation. J. Comput. Chem., 28, 1145-1152.
8. Jain, A. (2003) Surflex: fully automatic flexible molecular docking using a molecular similarity-based search engine. J. Med. Chem., 46, 499-511.
9. Johnson, V. et al. (2005) Update of the drug resistance mutations in HIV-1: fall 2005. Top HIV Med., 13, 125-131.
10. Kitchen, D.B. et al. (2004) Docking and scoring in virtual screening for drug discovery: methods and applications. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov., 3, 935-949.
11. Kohonen, T. (2001) Self-Organizing Maps. Springer Series in Information Sciences, Heidelberg, Germany.
12. Liu, T. et al. (2007)BindingDB: a web-accessible database of experimentally determined protein-ligand binding affinities. Nucleic Acids Res., 35, D198-D201.
13. Mangiameli, P. et al. (1996) A comparison of SOM neural network and hierarchical clustering methods. Eur. J. Oper. Res., 93, 402-417.
14. Morris, G. et al. (1998)Automated docking using a Lamarckian genetic algorithm and an empirical binding free energy function. J. Comput. Chem., 19, 1639-1662.
15. Muegge, I. (2008) Synergies of virtual screening approaches. Mini Rev. Med. Chem., 8, 927-933.
16. Renner, S. et al. (2008) Maximum common binding modes (MCBM): consensus docking scoring using multiple ligand information and interaction fingerprints. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 48, 319-332.
17. Samsonova, E.V. et al. (2006) TreeSOM: cluster analysis in the self-organizing map. Neural Netw., 19, 935-949.
18. Schafferhans, A. and Klebe, G. (2001) Docking ligands onto binding site representations derived from proteins built by homology modelling. J. Mol. Biol., 307, 407-427.
19. Schüttelkopf, A. and van Aalten, D. (2004) PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein-ligand complexes. Acta Cryst., 60, 1355-1363.
20. Triballeau, N. et al. (2005)Virtual screening workflow development guided by the "receiver operating characteristic" curve approach. Application to high-throughput docking on metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 4. J. Med. Chem., 48, 2534-2547.
21. Wang, J. et al. (2005)Hierarchical database screenings for HIV-1 reverse transcriptase using a pharmacophore model, rigid docking, solvation docking, and MMPB/SA. J. Med. Chem., 48, 2432-2444.
22. Wang, W. and Kollman, P. (2001)Computational study of protein specificity: the molecular basis of HIV-1 protease drug resistance. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 98, 14937-14942.
23. Warren, G.L. et al. (2006) A critical assessment of docking programs and scoring functions. J. Med. Chem., 49, 5912-5931.
24. Waszkowycz, B. (2008) Towards improving compound selection in structure-based virtual screening. Drug Discov. Today, 13, 219-226.
25. Yang, J. et al. (2005)Consensus scoring criteria for improving enrichment in virtual screening. J. Chem. Inf. Model., 45, 1134-1146.