Exploring the links between external and internal activity from a cultural-historical perspective

The Transformation of Learning: Advances in Cultural-Historical Activity Theory

Volumn , Issue , 2008, Pages 38-57

  Arievitch, Igor M ^a  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY OF NEW YORK   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75149198208     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.1017/CBO9780511499937.005     Document Type: Chapter

References (46)

1. Arievitch, I. M., & van der Veer, R. (1995). Furthering the internalization debate: Galperin’s contribution. Human Development, 38 (2), 113-126.
2. Arievitch, I. M., & van der Veer, R. (2004). The role of non-automatic regulation of activity: From Lipps to Galperin. History of Psychology, 7 (2), 154-182.
3. Bearison, D. J., & Dorval, B. (2002). Collaborative cognition: Children negotiating ways of knowing. Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
4. Bereiter, C. (2002). Education and mind in the knowledge age. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
5. Bruner, J. (1985). Vygotsky: A historical and conceptual perspective. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 21-34). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
6. Chaiklin, S. (2002). A developmental teaching approach to schooling. In G. Wells and G. Claxton (Eds.), Learning for life in the 21st century: Sociocultural perspectives on the future of education. London: Blackwell.
7. Cole, M. (1996). Cultural psychology: A once and future discipline. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
8. Donald, M. (2001). A mind so rare. New York: W. W. Norton.
9. Engestrom, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta Konsultit.
10. Galperin, P. Ia. (1976). Vvedenie v psikhologiju [Introduction to psychology]. Moscow: Izd-vo Moskovskogo Universiteta.
11. Galperin, P. Ia. (1989). The problem of attention. Soviet Psychology, 27 (3), 83-92. (Original work published 1976)
12. Galperin, P. Ia. (1992a). Stage-by-stage formation as a method of psychological investigation. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30 (4), 60-80. (Original work published 1978)
13. Galperin, P. Ia. (1992b). The problem of activity in Soviet psychology. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 30 (4), 37-59. (Original work published 1977)
14. Galperin, P. Ia. (1997). Pismo k A. N. Leontievu, 1940 [Letter to A. N. Leontiev, 1940]. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta, 14 (3), 3-7.
15. Galperin, P. Ia. (1998a). Razlichie v ispol’zovanii orudii u cheloveka i vspomogatel’nykh sredstv u zhivotnykh i ego psikhologicheskoe znachenie [The difference between human tool use and the use of auxiliary means in animals and its psychological significance]. In P. Ia. Galperin, Psikhologiia kak obyektivnaya nauka [Psychology as a rigorous science] (pp. 37-93).Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical and Social Sciences. (Original manuscript written 1935)
16. Galperin, P. Ia. (1998b).Metod, fakty i teorii v psikhologii formirovaniia umstvennykh deistvii i poniatii [The method, facts, and theories in the mental actions and concepts formation]. In P. Ia. Galperin, Psikhologiia kak dobyektivnaya nauka [Psychology as a rigorous science] (pp. 389-398). Moscow: Academy of Pedagogical and Social Sciences. (Original manuscript written 1966)
17. Galperin, P. Ia., & Kabylnitskaia, S. L. (1974). Eksperimentalnoe formirovanie vnimaniia [Experimental formation of attention]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU.
18. Glassmann, M. (2001). Dewey and Vygotsky: Society, experience, and inquiry in educational practice. Educational Researcher, 30 (4), 3-14.
19. Haenen, J. (1996a). Piotr Galperin: Psychologist in Vygotsky’s footsteps. New York: Nova Science Publishers.
20. Haenen, J. (1996b). Piotr Galperin’s criticism and extension of Lev Vygotsky’s work. Journal of Russian and East European Psychology, 34 (2), 54-60.
21. Hatano, G., & Wertsch, J. V. (2001). Sociocultural approaches to cognitive development: The constitutions of culture in mind. Human Development, 44 (2), 77-83.
22. Hutchins, E. (1996). Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
23. Kozulin, A. (1986). The concept of activity in Soviet psychology. American Psychologist, 41 (3), 264-274.
24. Lave, J., &. Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
25. Latour, B. (1999). Pandora’s hope: Essays on the reality of science studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
26. Leontiev, A. N. (1978). Activity, consciousness and personality. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
27. Leontiev, A. N. (1981). Problems of the development of the mind. Moscow: Progress. (Original work published 1959)
28. Minick, N. (1987). The development of Vygotsky’s thought: An Introduction. In R. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 17-36). New York: Plenum Press.
29. Minnis, M., & John-Steiner, V. P. (2001). Are we ready for a single, integrated theory? Human Development, 44 (5), 296-310.
30. Morawski, J. (2001). Gifts bestowed, gifts withheld: Assessing psychological theory with a Kochian attitude. American Psychologist, 56, 433-440.
31. Obukhova, L. F. (1972). Etapy razvitiia detskogo myshleniia [Stages in the development of the child’s thinking]. Moscow: MGU.
32. Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35 (4), 227-241.
33. Podolskij, A. I. (1987). Stanovlenie poznavatelnogo deistviia: Nauchnaia abstraktsiia I realnost [The genesis of cognitive action: Scientific abstraction and reality].Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU.
34. Rogoff, B. (1990). Apprenticeship in thinking: Cognitive development in social context. New York: Oxford University Press.
35. Rogoff, B. (2003). The cultural nature of human development. New York: Oxford University Press.
36. Scribner, S. (1985). Vygotsky’s use of history. In J. V.Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives (pp. 119-145). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
37. Stetsenko, A., & Arievitch, I. M. (1997). Constructing and deconstructing the self: Comparing post-Vygotskian and discourse-based versions of social constructivism. Mind, Culture, and Activity, 4 (3), 160-173.
38. Talyzina, N. F. (1975). Upravlenie protsessom usvoeniia znanii [Guiding the process of knowledge acquisition]. Moscow: Izdatelstvo MGU.
39. Valsiner, J., & van der Veer, R. (2000). The socialmind. Cambridge:CambridgeUniversity Press.
40. van der Veer, R., & Valsiner, J. (1991). Understanding Vygotsky: A quest for synthesis. Oxford: Blackwell.
41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1987). Thinking and speech. In R. Rieber & A. S. Carton (Eds.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 1. Problems of general psychology (pp. 39-285). New York: Plenum Press.
42. Vygotsky, L. S. (1997). The history of the development of higher mental functions. In R. Rieber (Ed.), The collected works of L. S. Vygotsky: Vol. 4. The history of the development of higher mental functions (pp. 1-125). New York: Plenum Press.
43. Wells, G. (1999). Dialogic inquiry: Towards a sociocultural practice and theory of education. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
44. Wertsch, J. V. (1998). Mind as action. New York: Oxford University Press.
45. Zinchenko, P. I. (1983). The problem of involuntarymemory. Soviet Psychology, 4, 9-33.
46. Zinchenko, V. P. (1985). Vygotsky’s ideas about units for the analysis of mind. In J. V. Wertsch (Ed.), Culture, communication, and cognition: Vygotskian perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.