True coronary bifurcation lesions: Meta-analysis and review of literature

Journal of Cardiovascular Medicine

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 103-110

  Athappan, Ganesh ^a   Ponniah, Thirumalaikolundiusubramanian ^b   Jeyaseelan, Lakshmanan ^c  

^a TUFTS UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

^b MADURAI MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

^c CHRISTIAN MEDICAL COLLEGE   (India)

Author keywords

Drug eluting stents for coronary bifurcation; Meta analysis; True coronary bifurcation

Indexed keywords

PACLITAXEL; RAPAMYCIN;

ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTICLE; BALLOON DILATATION; BLOOD VESSEL DIAMETER; CLINICAL TRIAL; CORONARY ARTERY DISEASE; CORONARY STENT; DRUG ELUTING STENT; FOLLOW UP; HEART INFARCTION; HUMAN; META ANALYSIS; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PERCUTANEOUS TRANSLUMINAL ANGIOPLASTY; REVASCULARIZATION; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; STENT THROMBOSIS; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW; TARGET VESSEL REVASCULARIZATION; TRUE CORONARY BIFURCATION;

ANGIOPLASTY, TRANSLUMINAL, PERCUTANEOUS CORONARY; BLOOD VESSEL PROSTHESIS IMPLANTATION; CORONARY STENOSIS; DRUG-ELUTING STENTS; HUMANS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS AS TOPIC;

EID: 75149196768     PISSN: 15582027     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2459/JCM.0b013e32832ffc85     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Lefè vre T, Louvard Y, Morice MC, Loubeyre C, Piéchaud JF, Dumas P. Stenting of bifurcation lesions: a rational approach. J Interv Cardiol 2001; 14:573-585.
2. Chen SL, Patarca R. Perspectives on stenting of coronary bifurcation lesions. Indian Heart J 2008; 60:615-624.
3. Sharma SK. Update in management of coronary bifurcation lesions in the drug-eluting stent era. Indian Heart J 2006; 58:108-119.
4. Botas J. Bifurcation lesions: the last great frontier for coronary interventions. Rev Esp Cardiol 2008; 61:911-913.
5. Tsuchida K, Colombo A, Lefevre T, Oldroyd KG, Guetta V, Guagliumi G, et al. The clinical outcome of percutaneous treatment of bifurcation lesions in multivessel coronary artery disease with the sirolimus-eluting stent: insights from the Arterial Revascularization Therapies Study part II (ARTS II). Eur Heart J 2007; 28:433-442.
6. Valgimigli M, Malagutti P, Rodriguez Granillo GA, Tsuchida K, Garcia-Garcia HM, van Mieghem CA, et al. Single-vessel versus bifurcation stenting for the treatment of distal left main coronary artery disease in the drug-eluting stenting era. Clinical and angiographic insights into the Rapamycin-Eluting Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (RESEARCH) and Taxus-Stent Evaluated at Rotterdam Cardiology Hospital (T-SEARCH) registries. Am Heart J 2006; 152:896-902.
7. Kim YH, Park SW, Hong MK, Park DW, Park KM, Lee BK, et al. Comparison of simple and complex stenting techniques in the treatment of unprotected left main coronary artery bifurcation stenosis. Am J Cardiol 2006; 97:1597-1601.
8. Yamashita T, Nishida T, Adamian MG, Briquori C, Vaghetti M, Corvaja N, et al. Bifurcation lesions: two stents versus one stent-immediate and follow-up results. J Am Coll Cardiol 2000; 35:1145-1151.
9. Sharma SK, Choudhry A, Lee J, Kim MC, Fischer E, Steinheimer AM, et al. Simultaneous kissing stents technique for treating bifurcation lesions in medium to large size coronary arteries. Am J Cardiol 2004; 94:913-917.
10. Collins N, Seidelin PH, Daly P, Ivanov J, Barolet A, Mackie K, et al. Long term outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation narrowings. Am J Cardiol 2008; 102:404-410.
11. Ferenc M, Gick M, Kienzle RP, Bestehorn HP, Werner KD, Comberg T, et al. Randomized trial on routine vs provisional T stenting in treatment of de novo coronary bifurcation lesions. Eur Heart J 2008; 29:2859-2867.
12. Steigen TK, Maeng M, Wiseth R, Erglis A, Kumsars I, Narbute I, et al., Nordic PCI Study Group. Randomized study on simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions: the Nordic bifurcation study. Circulation 2006; 114:1955-1961.
13. Di Mario C, Morici N, Godino C, Goktekin O, Tamburino C, Barbagallo R, et al. Predictors of restenosis after treatment of bifurcational lesions with paclitaxel eluting stents: a multicenter prospective registry of 150 consecutive patients. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2007; 69:416-424.
14. Ge L, Tsagalou E, Iakovou I, Sangiorgi GM, Corvaja N, Airoldi F, et al. In hospital and nine month outcome of treatment of coronary bifurcation lesions with Sirolimus eluting stent. Am J Cardiol 2005; 95:757-760.
15. Assali AR, Assa HV, Ben-Dor I, Teplitsky I, Solodky A, Brosh D, et al. Drugeluting stents in bifurcation lesions: to stent one branch or both? Catheter Cardiovasc Interv 2006; 68:891-896.
16. Colombo A, Bramucci E, Sacca S, Violini R, Lettieri C, Zanini R, et al. Randomized study of the crush technique versus provisional side branch stenting in true coronary bifurcations. The (Coronary bifurcations: application of the crushing technique using sirolimus-eluting stents) CACTUS study. Circulation 2009; 119:71-78.
17. Colombo A, Moses JW, Morice MC, Ludwig J, Holmes DR Jr, Spanos V, et al. Randomized study to evaluate sirolimus-eluting stents implanted at coronary bifurcation lesions. Circulation 2004; 109:1244-1249.
18. Gao Z, Yang YJ, Gao RL. Comparative study of simple versus complex stenting of coronary artery bifurcation lesions in daily practice in Chinese patients. Clin Cardiol 2008; 31:317-322.
19. Pan M, de Lezo JS, Medina A, Romero M, Segura J, Pavlovic D, et al. Rapamycin-eluting stents for the treatment of bifurcated coronary lesions: a randomized comparison of a simple versus complex strategy. Am Heart J 2004; 148:857-864.
20. Babapulle MN, Joseph L, Bé lisle P, Brophy JM, Eisenberg MJ. A hierarchical Bayesian meta-analysis of randomised clinical trials of drug-eluting stents. Lancet 2004; 364:583-591.
21. Niccoli G, Ferrante G, Porto I, Burzotta F, Leone AM, Mongiardo R, et al. Coronary bifurcation lesions: to stent one branch or both? A meta analysis of patients treated with drug eluting stents. Int J Cardiol 2008. [Epub ahead of print]