Erratum to Structural Equation Models of Latent Interactions: An Appropriate Standardized Solution and Its Scale-Free Properties (Structural Equation Modeling, 17, 1 (1-22), 10.1080/10705510903438872);Structural equation models of latent interactions: An appropriate standardized solution and its scale-free properties

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 1-22

  Wen, Zhonglin ^a   Marsh, Herbert W ^b   Hau, Kit Tai ^c  

^a SOUTH CHINA NORMAL UNIVERSITY   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD   (United Kingdom)

^c CHINESE UNIVERSITY OF HONG KONG   (Hong Kong)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

INTERACTION EFFECT; INTERACTION TERM; LATENT VARIABLE; MULTIPLE REGRESSION MODEL; PARAMETER ESTIMATE; SCALE-FREE PROPERTIES; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELING; STRUCTURAL EQUATION MODELS;

PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

EID: 75149189823     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705511.2010.483979     Document Type: Erratum

References (33)

1. Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions.Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
2. Algina J., & Moulder B. C. (2001). A note on estimating the Jöreskog-Yang model for latent variable interaction using LISREL 8.3. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 40-52.
3. Arminger, G., & Muthén, B. O. (1998). A Bayesian approach to nonlinear latent variable models using the Gibbs sampler and the Metropolis-Hastings algorithm. Psychometrika, 63, 271-300.
4. Boomsma, A. (1982). Robustness of LISREL against small sample sizes in factor analysis models. In K. G. Jöreskog & H. Wold (Eds.), Systems under indirect observation: Causality, structure, prediction (Part I, pp. 149-173). Amsterdam: North-Holland.
5. Browne, M. W. (1982). Covariance structures. In S. M. Hawkins (Ed.), Topics in applied multivariate analysis (pp. 72-141). Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
6. Coenders, G., Batista-Foguet, J. M., & Saris,W. E. (2008). Simple, efficient and distribution free approach to interaction effects in complex structural equation models. Quality & Quantity, 42, 369-396.
7. Cohen, J., Cohen, P., West, S. G., & Aiken, L. S. (2003). Applied multiple regression/correlational analysis for the behavioral sciences (3rd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
8. Cudeck, R. (1989). Analysis of correlation matrices using covariance structure models. Psychological Bulletin, 105, 317-327.
9. Efron, B., & Tibshirani, R. (1993). An introduction to the bootstrap. London: Chapman & Hall.
10. Friedrich, R. J. (1982). In defense of multiplicative terms in multiple regression equations. American Journal of Political Science, 26, 797-833.
11. Hau, K. T., & Marsh, H. W. (2004). The use of item parcels in structural equation modeling: Non-normal data and small sample sizes. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology, 57, 327-351.
12. Jaccard, J., Turrisi, R., & Wan, C. K. (1990). Interaction effects in multiple regression. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
13. Jaccard, J., & Wan, C. K. (1995).Measurement error in the analysis of interaction effects between continuous predictors using multiple regression: Multiple indicator and structural equation approaches. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 348-357.
14. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1999). LISREL 8.30: Interactive LISREL for MS Windows 3.1+, Windows'95, Windows'98 and Windows NT. Chicago, IL: Scientific Software International.
15. J̈reskog, K. G., & Yang, F. (1996). Nonlinear structural equation models: The Kenny-Judd model with interaction effects. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacker (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 57-88). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
16. Kenny, D. A., & Judd, C. M. (1984). Estimating the nonlinear and interactive effects of latent variables. Psychological Bulletin, 96, 201-210.
17. Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (2000). Maximum likelihood estimation of latent interaction effects with the LMS method. Psychometrika, 65, 457-474.
18. Klein, A., & Muthén, B. (2007). Quasi-maximum likelihood estimation of structural equation models with multiple interaction and quadratic effects. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 42, 647-674.
19. Lee, S. Y., Song, X. Y., & Poon, W. Y. (2004). Comparison of approaches in estimating interaction and quadratic effects of latent variables. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 29, 37-67.
20. Lin, G.-C., Wen, Z., Marsh,H.W., & Lin, H.-S. (in press). Structural equationmodels of latent interactions: Clarification of orthogonalizing and double-mean-centering strategies. Structural Equation Modeling.
21. Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Widaman, K. F. (2006). On the merits of orthogonalizing powered and product terms: Implications for modeling interactions among latent variables. Structural Equation Modeling, 13, 497-519.
22. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2004). Structural equation models of latent interactions: Evaluation of alternative estimation strategies and indicator construction. Psychological Methods, 9, 275-300.
23. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., & Hau, K. T. (2006). Structural equation models of latent interaction and quadratic effects. In G. Hancock & R. O. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 225-265). Greenwich, CT: Information Age.
24. Marsh, H. W., Wen, Z., Hau, K. T., Little, T. D., Bovaird, J. A., & Widaman, K. F. (2007). Unconstrained structural equation models of latent interactions: Contrasting residual- and mean-centered approaches. Structural Equation Modeling, 14, 570-580.
25. McDonald, R. P., & Ho, M. R. (2002). Principles and practice in reporting structural equation analyses. Psychological Methods, 7, 64-82.
26. Moulder, B. C., & Algina, J. (2002). Comparison of methods for estimating and testing latent variable interactions. Structural Equation Modeling, 9, 1-19.
27. Ping, R. A., Jr. (1996a). Latent variable interaction and quadratic effect estimation: A two-step technique using structural equation analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 166-175.
28. Ping, R. A., Jr. (1996b). Latent variable regression: A technique for estimating interaction and quadratic coefficients. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 31, 95-120.
29. Saris, W. E., Batista-Foguet, J. M., & Coenders, G. (2007). Selection of indicators for the interaction term in structural equation models with interaction. Quality and Quantity, 41, 55-72.
30. Schermelleh-Engel, K., Klein, A., & Moosbrugger, H. (1998). Estimating nonlinear effects using a latent moderated structural equations approach. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 203-238). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
31. Shrout, P. E., & Bolger, N. (2002). Mediation in experimental and nonexperimental studies: New procedures and recommendations. Psychological Methods, 7, 422-445.
32. Wall, M. M., & Amemiya, Y. (2001). Generalized appended product indicator procedure for nonlinear structural equation analysis. Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, 26, 1-29.
33. Yang, F. (1998). Modeling interaction and nonlinear effects: A step-by-step LISREL example. In R. E. Schumacker & G. A. Marcoulides (Eds.), Interaction and nonlinear effects in structural equation modeling (pp. 17-42). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.