Utilizing different methods for visualizing susceptibility from a single multi-gradient echo dataset

Magnetic Resonance Materials in Physics, Biology and Medicine

Volumn 22, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 297-308

  Varma, Gopal ^a   Pedersen, Steen Fjord ^b   Taupitz, Matthias ^c   Botnar, Rene Michael ^a   Dahnke, Hannes ^d   Keevil, Stephen Frederick ^a,e   Schaeffter, Tobias ^a  

^a KING'S COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b AARHUS UNIVERSITY   (Denmark)

^c CHARITÉ UNIVERSITÄTSMEDIZIN BERLIN   (Germany)

^d PHILIPS RESEARCH LABORATORIES   (Germany)

^e ST THOMAS HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Positive contrast; Post processing; Seed markers; Susceptibility; VSOP

Indexed keywords

CONTRAST MEDIUM; DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; FERRIC ION; FERRIC OXIDE; GELATIN;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BALLOON DILATATION; CAROTID ARTERY INJURY; CHEMISTRY; DISEASE MODEL; ECHO PLANAR IMAGING; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; IMAGE QUALITY; METHODOLOGY; PATHOLOGY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLUTION AND SOLUBILITY; SWINE;

ANIMALS; BALLOON DILATATION; CAROTID ARTERY INJURIES; CONTRAST MEDIA; DISEASE MODELS, ANIMAL; ECHO-PLANAR IMAGING; FERRIC COMPOUNDS; GELATIN; IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; PHANTOMS, IMAGING; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; SOLUTIONS; SWINE;

SUIDAE;

EID: 75149189486     PISSN: 09685243     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10334-009-0180-4     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. J Wuerfel E Tysiak T Prozorovski M Smyth S Mueller J Schnorr M Taupitz F Zipp 2007 Mouse model mimics multiple sclerosis in the clinico-radiological paradox Eur J Neurosci 26 190 198 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2007.05644.x 17596194 (Pubitemid 47035449)
2. A Heymer D Haddad M Weber U Gbureck PM Jakob J Eulert U Nöth 2008 Iron oxide labelling of human mesenchymal stem cells in collagen hydrogels for articular cartilage repair Biomaterials 29 1473 1483 10.1016/j.biomaterials. 2007.12.003 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD1cXhtVGjsb0%3D 18155133
3. P Acher R Popert J Nichol L Potters S Morris R Beaney 2006 Permanent prostate brachytherapy: dosimetric results and analysis of a learning curve with a dynamic dose-feedback technique Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 65 694 698 16626891
4. C Cunningham T Arai P Yang M Mcconnell J Pauly S Conolly 2005 Positive contrast magnetic resonance imaging of cells labeled with magnetic nanoparticles Magn Reson Med 53 999 1005 10.1002/mrm.20477 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2MXksFGmtro%3D 15844142 (Pubitemid 40627773)
5. M Stuber W Gilson M Schär D Kedziorek L Hofmann S Shah E Vonken J Bulte D Kraitchman 2007 Positive contrast visualization of iron oxide-labeled stem cells using inversion-recovery with ON-resonant water suppression (IRON) Magn Reson Med 58 1072 1077 10.1002/mrm.21399 17969120 (Pubitemid 350074377)
6. V Mani K Briley-Saebo V Itskovich D Samber Z Fayad 2005 Gradient echo acquisition for superparamagnetic particles with positive contrast (GRASP): Sequence characterization in membrane and glass superparamagnetic iron oxide phantoms at 1.5T and 3T Magn Reson Med 55 126 135 10.1002/mrm.20739
7. J Seppenwoolde M Viergever C Bakker 2003 Passive tracking exploiting local signal conservation: the white marker phenomenon Magn Reson Med 50 784 790 10.1002/mrm.10574 14523965 (Pubitemid 37187844)
8. WR Overall JM Pauly 2007 Field-encoded SSFP: a new method for positive-contrast visualization of paramagnetic agents Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 15 579
9. H Dahnke W Liu D Herzka J Frank T Schaeffter 2008 Susceptibility gradient mapping (SGM): a new postprocessing method for positive contrast generation applied to superparamagnetic iron oxide particle (SPIO)-labeled cells Magn Reson Med 60 595 603 10.1002/mrm.21478 18727097
10. W Liu H Dahnke E Jordan T Schaeffter J Frank 2008 In vivo MRI using positive-contrast techniques in detection of cells labeled with superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles NMR Biomed 21 242 250 10.1002/nbm.1187 17566968
11. JF Schenck 1996 The role of magnetic susceptibility in magnetic resonance imaging: MRI magnetic compatibility of the first and second kinds Med Phys 23 815 850 10.1118/1.597854 1:STN:280:DyaK28zptFWqtA%3D%3D 8798169 (Pubitemid 26192503)
12. K Pels M Labinaz C Hoffert ER O'Brien 1999 Adventitial angiogenesis early after coronary angioplasty: correlation with arterial remodeling Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 19 229 238 1:STN:280:DyaK1M7ktFarsQ%3D%3D 9974402
13. H Dahnke T Schaeffter 2005 Limits of detection of SPIO at 3.0 T using T2*relaxometry Magn Reson Med 53 1202 1206 10.1002/mrm.20435 1:STN:280:DC%2BD2M3hslaltA%3D%3D 15844156 (Pubitemid 40627800)
14. DW Marquardt 1963 An algorithm for least-squares estimation of nonlinear parameters J Soc Ind Appl Math 11 431 441 10.1137/0111030
15. H Gudbjartsson S Patz 1995 The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data Magn Reson Med 34 910 914 10.1002/mrm.1910340618 1:STN:280:DyaK287mslKqtQ%3D%3D 8598820
16. AJ Miller PM Joseph 1993 The use of power images to perform quantitative analysis on low SNR MR images Magn Reson Imaging 11 1051 1056 10.1016/0730-725X(93)90225-3 1:STN:280:DyaK2c%2FkvV2mtA%3D%3D 8231670
17. P Mansfield 1984 Spatial mapping of the chemical shift in NMR Magn Reson Med 1 370 386 10.1002/mrm.1910010308 1:CAS:528:DyaL2MXkt1eksQ%3D%3D 6571566 (Pubitemid 15117823)
18. D Bourgeois R Deslauriers 1992 Phasing spin-echo-acquired 31P spectroscopic images using complex conjugate data reversal Magn Reson Med 28 122 128 10.1002/mrm.1910280112 1:STN:280:DyaK3s%2FmtF2msg%3D%3D 1435215
19. JB Allen LR Rabiner 1977 A unified approach to short-time Fourier analysis Proc IEEE 65 1558 1564 10.1109/PROC.1977.10770
20. JR Reichenbach R Venkatesan DA Yablonskiy MR Thompson S Lai EM Haacke 1997 Theory and application of static field inhomogeneity effects in gradient-echo imaging J Magn Reson Imaging 7 266 279 10.1002/jmri.1880070203 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ksF2gtQ%3D%3D 9090577 (Pubitemid 28356957)
21. KM Lüdeke P Röschmann R Tischler 1985 Susceptibility artefacts in NMR imaging Magn Reson Imaging 3 329 343 10.1016/0730-725X(85)90397-2 4088009 (Pubitemid 16176583)
22. Boulby PA, Rugg-Gunn FJ (2003) T2: the Transverse Relaxation Time. In: Tofts P (eds) Quantitative MRI of the brain. Wiley, Chichester, pp 143-202
23. H Dahnke W Liu JA Frank T Schaeffter 2007 Suppression of large scale susceptibility artifacts in positive contrast images Proc Int Soc Magn Reson Med 15 1228
24. E Vonken M Schär M Stuber 2008 Positive contrast visualization of nitinol devices using susceptibility gradient mapping Magn Reson Med 60 588 594 10.1002/mrm.21688 18727096