Exploring the acceptability of two self-sampling devices for human papillomavirus testing in the cervical screening context: A qualitative study of Muslim women in London

Journal of Medical Screening

Volumn 16, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 193-198

  Szarewski, Anne ^a   Cadman, Louise ^a   Ashdown Barr, Lesley ^a   Waller, Jo ^b  

^a QUEEN MARY UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PATIENT EDUCATION; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; RELIGION; UTERINE CERVIX TUMOR;

ADULT; AGED; FEMALE; HUMANS; ISLAM; MIDDLE AGED; PAPILLOMAVIRUS INFECTIONS; PATIENT ACCEPTANCE OF HEALTH CARE; PATIENT EDUCATION AS TOPIC; UTERINE CERVICAL NEOPLASMS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75149163953     PISSN: 09691413     EISSN: 14755793     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1258/jms.2009.009069     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Baker D, Middleton E. Cervical screening and health inequality in England in the 1990s. J Epidemiol Community Health 2003;57:417-423
2. Patnick J. NHS Cervical Screening Programme Annual Review 2008. Sheffield: NHSCSP, 2008
3. Luke K. Cervical cancer screening: meeting the needs of minority ethnic women. Br J Cancer Suppl 1996;29:S47-50
4. Moser K, Patnick J, Beral V. Inequalities in reported use of breast and cervical screening in Great Britain: analysis of cross sectional survey data. BMJ 2009;338:b2025
5. Webb R, Richardson J, Esmail A, Pickles A. Uptake for cervical screening by ethnicity and place-of-birth: a population-based cross-sectional study. J Public Health (Oxf) 2004;26:293-296 (Pubitemid 39312935)
6. Chiu LF. Inequalities of Access to Cancer Screening: A Literature Review. NHSCSP, Report No.: Cancer Screening Series No. 1, 2003.
7. Sutton S, Rutherford C. Sociodemographic and attitudinal correlates of cervical screening uptake in a national sample of women in Britain. Soc Sci Med 2005;61:2460-2465
8. Willoughby BJ, Faulkner K, Stamp EC, Whitaker CJ. A descriptive study of the decline in cervical screening coverage rates in the North East and Yorkshire and the Humber regions of the UK from 1995 to 2005. J Public Health (Oxf) 2006;28:355-360
9. Lunt R. Worldwide early detection of cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol 1984;63:708-713
10. Ponten J, Adami HO, Bergstrom R, et al. Strategies for global control of cervical cancer. Int J Cancer 1995;60:1-26
11. Orbell S. Cognition and affect after cervical screening: the role of previous test outcome and personal obligation in future uptake expectations. Soc Sci Med 1996;43:1237-1243
12. Thomas VN, Saleem T, Abraham R. Barriers to effective uptake of cancer screening among Black and minority ethnic groups. Int J Palliat Nurs 2005;11:562, 564-571
13. Lancuck L, Patnick J, Vessey M. A cohort effect in cervical screening coverage? J Med Screen 2008;15:27-29
14. McKie L.Women's views of the cervical smear test: implications for nursing practice - women who have not had a smear test. J Adv Nurs 1993;18:972-979
15. Sasieni PD, Cuzick J, Lynch-Farmery E. Estimating the efficacy of screening by auditing smear histories of women with and without cervical cancer. The National Co-ordinating Network for Cervical Screening Working Group. Br J Cancer 1996;73:1001-1005
16. Mubiayi N, Bogaert E, Boman F, et al. Cytological history of 148 women presenting with invasive cervical cancer. Gynecol Obstet Fertil 2002;30:210-217
17. Walboomers JM, Jacobs MV, Manos MM, et al. Human papillomavirus is a necessary cause of invasive cervical cancer worldwide. J Pathol 1999;189:12-19
18. Bosch FX, Castellsague X, de Sanjosé S. HPV and cervical cancer: screening or vaccination? Br J Cancer 2008;98:15-21
19. Ogilvie GS, Patrick DM, Schulzer M, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of self collected vaginal specimens for human papillomavirus compared to clinician collected human papillomavirus specimens: a meta-analysis. Sex Transm Infect 2005;81:207-212
20. Petignat P, Faltin DL, Bruchim I, Tramer MR, Franco EL, Coutlee F. Are self-collected samples comparable to physician-collected cervical specimens for human papillomavirus DNA testing? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol Oncol 2007;105:530-535
21. Szarewski A, Cadman L, Mallett S, et al. Human papillomavirus testing by self-sampling: assessment of accuracy in an unsupervised clinical setting. J Med Screen 2007;14:34-42
22. Koliopoulos G, Arbyn M, Martin-Hirsch P, Kyrgiou M, Prendiville W, Paraskevaidis E. Diagnostic accuracy of human papillomavirus testing in primary cervical screening: a systematic review and meta-analysis of non-randomized studies. Gynecol Oncol 2007;104:232-246
23. Waller J, McCaffery K, Forrest S, et al. Acceptability of unsupervised HPV self-sampling using written instructions. J Med Screen 2006;13:208-213
24. Barata PC, Mai V, Howlett R, Gagliardi AR, Stewart DE. Discussions about self-obtained samples for HPV testing as an alternative for cervical cancer prevention. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol 2008;29:251-257
25. Stewart DE, Gagliardi A, Johnston M, et al. Self-collected samples for testing of oncogenic human papillomavirus: a systematic review. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2007;29:817-828
26. Forrest S, McCaffery K, Waller J, et al. Attitudes to self-sampling for HPV among Indian, Pakistani, African-Caribbean and white British women in Manchester, UK. J Med Screen 2004;11:85-88
27. McCaffery K, Forrest S, Waller J, Desai M, Szarewski A, Wardle J. Attitudes towards HPV testing: a qualitative study of beliefs among Indian, Pakistani, African-Caribbean and white British women in the UK. Br J Cancer 2003;88:42-46
28. Bais AG, van Kemenade FJ, Berkhof J, et al. Human papillomavirus testing on self-sampled cervicovaginal brushes: an effective alternative to protect nonresponders in cervical screening programs. Int J Cancer 2007;120:1505-1510
29. Ritchie J, Lewis J. Qualitative Research Practice: A Guide for Social Sciences Students and Researchers. London: Sage Publications, 2003
30. Naish J, Brown J, Denton B. Intercultural consultations: investigation of factors that deter non-English speaking women from attending their general practitioners for cervical screening. BMJ 1994;309: 1126-1128
31. Gok M, Heideman DA, Van Kemade FJ, et al. Prevention by Offering HR HPV Testing on Self-sampled Cervicovaginal Specimens Trial (PROHTECT). Abstract O-21.01 Presented at the 25th International Papillomavirus Conference, Malmo, 2009