Prepotential formulation of SU(3) lattice gauge theory

Journal of Physics A: Mathematical and Theoretical

Volumn 43, Issue 3, 2010, Pages

  Anishetty, Ramesh ^a   Mathur, Manu ^b   Raychowdhury, Indrakshi ^b  

^a INSTITUTE OF MATHEMATICAL SCIENCES   (India)

^b S N BOSE NATIONAL CENTRE FOR BASIC SCIENCES   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75149161653     PISSN: 17518113     EISSN: 17518121     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1751-8113/43/3/035403     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Mandelstam S 1962 Ann. Phys., NY 19 1
2. Mandelstam S 1968 Phys. Rev. 175 1580
3. Mandelstam S 1979 Phys. Rev. D 19 2391
4. Wilson K G 1974 Phys. Rev. D 10 2445
5. Polyakov A M 1979 Phys. Lett. B 82 247
6. Polyakov A M 1983 Phys. Lett. B 82 199
7. Polyakov A M 1979 Nucl. Phys. B 164 171
8. Nambu N 1979 Phys. Lett. B 80 372
9. Gervais J L and Neveu A 1979 Phys. Lett. B 80 255
10. Makeenko Yu M and Migdal A A 1979 Phys. Lett. B 88 135
11. Makeenko Y M and Migdal A A 1981 Nucl. Phys. B 188 269
12. Gliozzi F and Virasaro T Reggeand M A 1979 Phys. Lett. B 81 178
13. Virasaro M 1979 Phys. Lett. B 82 436
14. Jevicki A and Sakita B 1974 Phys. Rev. D 22 467
15. Polyakov A M 1987 Gauge Fields and Strings (New York: Harwood)
16. Migdal A A 1983 Loop Equalions and 1/N Expansion Phys. Rep. 102 199
17. Kogut J and Susskind L 1974 Phys Rev. D 10 3468
18. Kogut J and Susskind L 1975 Phys Rev. D 11 395
19. Gambini R and Pullin J 2000 Loops, Knots, Gauge Theories and Quantum Gravity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
20. As emphasized in [6]: 'The proliferation of loops when one considers larger lattices and higher dimensions completely washes out the advantages provided by the (loop) formalism.', Chapter 12, page 303-304 - ref-separator -
21. Gambini R, Leal L and Trias A 1989 Phys. Rev. D 39 3127
22. Bartolo C, Gambini R and Leal L 1989 Phys. Rev. D 39 1756
23. Mathur M 2007 Nucl. Phys. B 779 32
24. Mathur M 2006 Phys. Lett. B 640 292-6
25. Mathur M 2005 J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 38 10015
26. Sharatchandra H S 1982 Nucl. Phys. B 196 62
27. Anishetty R and Sharatchandra H S 1990 Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 81
28. Gnanapragasam B and Sharatchandra H S 1992 Phys. Rev. D 45 R1010
29. Robson D and Weber D M 1982 Z. Phys. C 15 199
30. Furmanski W and Kolawa A 1987 Nucl. Phys. B 291 594
31. Burgio G, De Pietri R, Morales-Tecotl H A, Urrutia L F and Vergara J D 2000 Nucl. Phys. B 566 547
32. Brügmann B 1991 Phys. Rev. D 43 566
33. Loll R 1992 Nucl. Phys. B 368 121
34. Loll R 1993 Nucl. Phys. B 400 126
35. Watson N J 1994 Phys. Lett. B 323 385
36. Watson N J 1995 Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 39B (C) 224-7 (arXiv:hep-th/9408174)
37. Rovelli C 2004 Quantum Gravity (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press)
38. Rovelli C and Smolin L 1995 Phys. Rev. D 52 5743 (arXiv:gr-qc/9505006)
39. Dass N D H and Mathur M 2007 Class. Quantum Grav. 24 2179 (arXiv:gr-qc/0611156)
40. Chaturvedi S and Mukunda N 2002 J. Math. Phys. 43 5262
41. Anishetty R, Mathur M and Raychowdhury I 2009 J. Math. Phys. 50 053503
42. Jordan P 1935 Z. Phys. 94 531
43. Schwinger J 1952 U.S. Atomic Energy Commission Report NYO-3071
44. Mattis D 1982 The Theory of Magnetism (New York: Harper and Row)
45. Georgi H 1982 Lie Algebras in Particle Physics (Reading: Benjamin/Cummings)
46. Mathur M and Sen D 2001 J. Math. Phys. 42 4181
47. Mathur M and Mani H S 2002 J. Math. Phys. 43 5351
48. Anishetty R, Gadiyar H G, Mathur M and Sharatchandra H S 1991 Phys. Lett. B 271 391
49. Prakash J S and Sharatchandra H S 1996 J. Math. Phys. 37 6530