Object-oriented analysis: Is it just theory?

IEEE Software

Volumn 27, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 64-71

  Gelbard, Roy ^a   Te'Eni, Dov ^b   Sade, Matti ^b  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b TEL AVIV UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

Author keywords

Cost benefit; Object oriented analysis; Software; Software engineering; Uml

Indexed keywords

CODING PHASIS; OBJECT ORIENTED; OBJECT-ORIENTED ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SYSTEM MODELING; TRAINING PROGRAM; UML DIAGRAMS;

COMPUTER AIDED ANALYSIS; COMPUTER AIDED SOFTWARE ENGINEERING; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; COST REDUCTION; OBJECT ORIENTED PROGRAMMING;

COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS;

EID: 75149145516     PISSN: 07407459     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1109/MS.2009.151     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. R. Agarwal and A.P. Sinha, "Object-Oriented Modeling with UML: A Study of Developers' Perceptions," Comm. ACM, vol.46, no.9, 2003, pp. 248-256.
2. J. Iivari, "Why Are CASE Tools Not Used?" Comm. ACM, vol.39, no.10, 1996, pp. 94-104.
3. D.J. Reifer, "Is the Software Engineering State of the Practice Getting Closer to the State of the Art?" IEEE Software, vol.20, no.6, 2003, pp. 78-83.
4. J. Duggan, "Modeling and Methods: The Keys to the Quality Kingdom," Proc. Gartner Analysis and Design Summit, Gartner, 2001.
5. I. Sommerville, Software Engineering, 8th ed., Addison-Wesley, 2007.
6. R.S. Pressman, Software Engineering: A Practitioner's Approach, 6th ed., McGraw-Hill, 2005.
7. I. Davies et al., "How Do Practitioners Use Conceptual Modeling in Practice?" Data and Knowledge Eng., vol.58, no.3, 2006, pp. 358-380.
8. B. Dobing and J. Parsons, "How UML Is Used," Comm. ACM, vol.49, no.5, 2006, pp. 109-113.
9. C.F.J. Lange, M.R.V. Chaudron, and J. Muskens, "In Practice: UML Software Architecture and Design Description," IEEE Software, vol.23, no.2, 2006, pp. 40-46.
10. D. Téeni, R. Gelbard and M. Sade, "Increasing the Benefit of Analysis: The Case of Communication Support Systems," Didaktik der Informatik, Lecture Notes in Informatics, vol.92, Gesellschaft für Informatik, 2006, pp. 13-27.
11. A. Zeichick, "Modeling Usage Low: Developers Confused about UML 2.0", Software Development Times, 15 July 2002; www.sdtimes.com/content/ article.aspx?ArticleID=26637.
12. M. Fowler and K. Scott, UML Distilled: Applying the Standard Object Modeling Language, Addison-Wesley, 1997.
13. J.C. Knight et al., "Why Are Formal Methods Not Used More Widely?" Proc. 4th NASA Langley Formal Methods Workshop (LFM 97), NASA, 1997, pp. 1-12.
14. D. Dori, Object Process Methodology-a Holistic Systems Paradigm, Springer, 2002.
15. P. Shoval and J. Kabeli, "FOOM: Functional and Object-Oriented Analysis and Design of Information Systems: An Integrated Methodology," J. Database Management, vol.12, no.1, 2001, pp. 193-210.
16. D.E. Avison and G. Fitzgerald, "Where Now for Development Methodologies?" Comm. ACM, vol.46, no.1, 2003, pp. 79-82.
17. B.C. Bjoerk, "A Unified Approach for Modeling Construction Information," Building and Environment, vol.7, no.2, 1992, pp. 173-194.
18. D. Téeni, "The Language-Action Perspective as a Basis for Communication Support Systems," Comm. ACM, vol.49, no.5, 2006, pp. 65-70.
19. D. Téeni, J. Carey, and P. Zhang, Human-Computer Interaction: Developing Effective Organizational Information Systems, John Wiley & Sons, 2007.