The theory-methods interface

Methodological Issues in Aging Research

Volumn , Issue , 2015, Pages 19-42

  Bergeman, Cindy S ^a   Wallace, Kimberly A ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MONTANA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75149145484     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4324/9781315820989-7     Document Type: Chapter

References (47)

1. Alwin, D. F. (1988). Structural equation modeling in research on human development and aging. In K. W. Schaie, R. T. Campbell, W. Meredith, & S. Rawlings (Eds.), Methodological issues in aging research (pp. 71-170). New York: Springer.
2. Alwin, D. F. (1999). Aging and errors of measurement: Implications for the study of life-span development. In N. Schwarz, D. C. Park, B. Knauper, & S. Sudman (Eds.), Cognition, aging and self-reports (pp. 365-385). Philadelphia: Psychology Press.
3. Alwin, D. F., & Campbell, R. T. (2001). Quantitative approaches: Longitudinal methods in the study of human development and aging. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (5th ed., pp. 22-43). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
4. Baltes, P. B. (1987). Theoretical propositions of life-span developmental psychology: On the dynamics between growth and decline. Developmental Psychology, 23, 611-626.
5. Baltes, P. B., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1979). History and rationale of longitudinal research. In J. Nesselroade & P. B. Baltes (Eds.), Longitudinal research in the study of behavior and development (pp. 1-39). New York: Academic Press.
6. Baltes, P. B., Reese, H. W., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1988). Introduction to research methods: Life-span developmental psychology. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
7. Bergeman, C. S. (1997). Aging: Genetic and environmental influences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
8. Bergeman, C. S., Bisconti, T. L., & Boker, S. (1999). Emotion regulation in recently bereaved widows: A dynamical systems approach. National Institute of Aging-1 R03 AG18570-01.
9. Bergeman, C. S., & Plomin, R. (1996). Behavioral genetics. In Encyclopedia of gerontology (Vol. 1, pp. 163-172). Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
10. Bisconti, T. L. (2001). Widowhood in later life: A dynamical systems approach to emotion regulation. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, IN.
11. Bisconti, T. L., Bergeman, C. S., & Boker, S. (2004). Emotion regulation in recently bereaved widows: A dynamical systems approach. Journal of Gerontology: Psychological Sciences, 59, 158-167.
12. Campbell, D. T., & Stanley, J. C. (1963). Experimental and quasi experimental designs for research. Chicago: Rand McNally.
13. Cavanaugh, J. C., & Whitbourne, S. K. (1999). Research methods. In J. C. Cavanaugh & S. K. Whitbourne (Eds.), Gerontology: An interdisciplinary perspective (pp. 33-64). New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Cole, D. A., & Maxwell, S. E. (2003). Testing mediational models with longitudinal data: Myths and tips in the use of structural equation modeling. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 112, 558-577.
15. Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (1979). Quasi-experimentation: Design and analysis issues for field settings. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
16. Dannefer, D., & Sell, R. R. (1988). Age structure, the life course and “aged heterogeneity”: Prospects for research and theory. Comprehensive Gerontology-B, 2, 1-10.
17. Gubrium, J. F., & Sankar, A. (1994). Qualitative methods in aging research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Hendricks, J. (1996). Qualitative research: Contributions and advances. In R. H. Binstock & L. K. George (Eds.), Handbook of aging and the social sciences (4th ed., pp. 52-72). San Diego: Academic Press.
19. Jackson, J. S., & Antonucci, T. C. (2001). Survey methodology in life-span human development research. In S. H. Cohen & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological contributions (pp. 65-94). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
20. Labouvie, E. W. (1980). Identity versus equivalence of psychological measures and constructs. In L. W. Poon (Ed.), Aging in the 1980's: Psychological issues (pp. 493-502). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
21. Lebowitz, B. D. (1989). Scientific change and longitudinal research: Subjects, methods and environments. In M. P. Lawton & A. R. Herzog (Eds.), Special research methods for gerontology (pp. 309-317). Amityville, NY: Baywood.
22. Little, R. J. A., & Rubin, D. B. (1987). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
23. Maxwell, J. A. (1998). Designing a qualitative study. In L. Bickman & D. R. Rog (Eds.), Handbook of applied social research methods (pp. 69-100). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
24. McArdle, J. J., & Nesselroade, J. R. (1994). Using multivariate data to structure developmental change. In S. H. Cohen & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological contributions (pp. 223-267). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
25. McCall, R. B. (1977). Challenges to a science of developmental psychology. Child Development, 48, 333-344.
26. McClearn, G. E., & Vogler, G. P. (2001). The genetics of behavioral aging. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed., pp. 109-131). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
27. Neale, M. C., & Cardon, L. R. (1992). Methodology for genetic studies of twins and families. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Kluwer.
28. Nesselroade, J. R. (1988). Sampling and generalizability: Adult development and aging research issues examined within the general methodological framework of selection. In K. W. Schaie, R. T. Campbell, W. Meredith, & S. Rawlings (Eds.), Methodological issues in aging research (pp. 13-42). New York: Springer.
29. Nesselroade, J. R. (1991a). Individual differences in intraindividual change. In L. M. Collins & J. L. Horn (Eds.), Best methods for the analysis of change: Recent advances, unanswered questions, future directions (pp. 92-105). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
30. Nesselroade, J. R. (1991b). The warp and the woof of the developmental fabric. In R. Donws, L. Liben, & D. S. Palermo (Eds.), Visions of development, the environment, and aesthetics: The legacy of Joachim F. Wohlwill (pp. 213-240). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
31. Nesselroade, J. R., & Boker, S. M. (1994). Assessing constancy and change. In T. F. Heatherton & J. L. Weinberger (Eds.), Can personality change? (pp. 121-147). Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
32. Nesselroade, J. R., & Schmidt-McCollam, K. (2000). Putting the process in developmental processes. International Journal of Behavioral Development, 24, 295-300.
33. Nowak, A., & Lowenstein, M. (1994). Dynamical systems: A tool for social psychology? In R. R. Vallacher & A. Nowak (Eds.), Dynamical systems in social psychology (pp. 17-53). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
34. Reese, H. W. (1994). The data/theory dialectic: The nature of scientific progress. In S. H. Cohen & H. W. Reese (Eds.), Life-span developmental psychology: Methodological contributions (pp. 1- 27). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum & Associates.
35. Rudinger, G., & Rietz, C. (2001). Structural equation modeling in longitudinal research on aging. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed., pp. 29-52). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
36. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.
37. Schaie, K. W. (1965). A general model for the study of developmental problems. Psychological Bulletin, 64, 92-107.
38. Schaie, K. W. (1977). Quasi-experimental designs in the psychology of aging. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (pp. 39-58). New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
39. Schaie, K. W. (1986). Beyond calendar definitions of age, time, and cohort: The general developmental model revisited. Developmental Review, 5, 252-277.
40. Schaie, K. W. (1992). The impact of methodological changes in gerontology. International Journal of Aging and Human Development, 35, 19-29.
41. Schaie, K. W. (1996). Intellectual development in adulthood: The Seattle Longitudinal Study. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
42. Schaie, K. W., & Baltes, P. B. (1975). On sequential strategies in developmental research: Description or explanation? Human Development, 18, 384-390.
43. Schaie, K. W., & Hofer, S. M. (2001). Longitudinal studies in aging research. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th ed., pp. 53-77). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
44. Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
45. Smith, L. B., & Thelen, E. (1993). Can dynamic systems theory be usefully applied in areas other than motor development? In L. B. Smith & E. Thelen (Eds.), A dynamic systems approach to development (pp. 151-170). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
46. Strauss, A., & Corbin, S. (1998). Basics of qualitative research: Techniques and procedures for developing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
47. Webster's IINew Riverside University Dictionary. (1984). New York: Houghton Mifflin.