Selection criteria for preparatory object rotation in manual lifting actions

Journal of Motor Behavior

Volumn 42, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 11-27

  Chang, Lillian Y ^a   Klatzky, Roberta L ^b   Pollard, Nancy S ^c  

^a CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b CARNEGIE MELLON UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c Carnegie Mellon University   (United States)

Author keywords

Alternative movement strategies; Lifting capability; Object rotation; Preparatory manipulation

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BIOMECHANICS; BODY POSTURE; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMAN; MALE; MENTAL FUNCTION; MOVEMENT (PHYSIOLOGY); ORIENTATION; PERCEPTION; PHYSIOLOGY; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROTATION; TIME; WEIGHT BEARING;

ADULT; FEMALE; HAND; HAND STRENGTH; HUMANS; LIFTING; MALE; MENTAL PROCESSES; MOVEMENT; ORIENTATION; POSTURE; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; ROTATION; TIME FACTORS; WEIGHT PERCEPTION; WEIGHT-BEARING; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75149142563     PISSN: 00222895     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00222890903269195     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Burgess-Limerick, R., & Abernethy, B. (1997). Qualitatively different modes of lifting. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 19, 413-417.
2. Chang, L. Y., Zeglin, G. J., & Pollard, N. S. (2008). Preparatory object rotation as a human-inspired grasping strategy. In IEEE International Conference on Humanoid Robots (Humanoids 2008), Daejeon, Republic of Korea, 527-534.
3. Cooper, L. A.,&Shepard,R.N. (1973). The time required to prepare for a rotated stimulus. Memory & Cognition, 1, 246-250.
4. Fischman, M. G. (1998). Constraints on grip-selection: Minimizing awkwardness. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 328-330.
5. Latash, M. L., & Jaric, S. (2002). Organization of drinking: postural characteristics of arm-head coordination. Journal of Motor Behavior, 34, 139-150.
6. Pinheiro, J. C., & Bates, D. M. (2000). Mixed-effects models in S and S-PLUS. New York: Springer.
7. R Development Core Team. (2008). R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Retrieved April 17, 2009, from R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria.Web site: http://www.R-project.org
8. Rosenbaum, D. A., Engelbrecht, S. E., Bushe, M. M., & Loukopoulos, L. D. (1993a). A model for reaching control. Acta Psychologica, 82, 237-250.
9. Rosenbaum, D. A., Loukopoulos, L. D., Meulenbroek, R. G., Vaughan, J., & Engelbrecht, S. E. (1995). Planning reaches by evaluating stored postures. Psychological Review, 102(1), 28-67.
10. Rosenbaum, D. A., Marchak, F., Barnes, H. J., Vaughan, J., Slotta, J. D., & Jorgensen,M. J. (1990). Constraints for action selection: Overhand versus underhand grips. In Attention and performance XIII: Motor representation and control (pp. 321-342). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
11. Rosenbaum, D. A., van Heugten, C. M., & Caldwell, G. E. (1996). From cognition to biomechanics and back: The end-state comfort effect and the middle-is-faster effect. Acta Psychologica, 94(1), 59-85.
12. Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Barnes, H. J., & Jorgensen, M. J. (1992). Time course of movement planning: Selection of handgrips for object manipulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 18, 1058-1073.
13. Rosenbaum, D. A., Vaughan, J., Jorgensen, M. J., Barnes, H. J., & Stewart, E. (1993b). Plans for object manipulation. In Attention and performance XIV-A silver jubilee: Synergies in experimental psychology, artificial intelligence and cognitive neuroscience (pp. 803-820). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, Bradford Books.
14. Short, M. W., & Cauraugh, J. H. (1997). Planning macroscopic aspects ofmanual control: End-state comfort and point-of-change effects. Acta Psychologica, 96(1-2), 133-147.
15. Verbeke, G., & Molenberghs, G. (2000). Linear mixed models for longitudinal data. New York: Springer.
16. Zhang, W., & Rosenbaum, D. A. (2008). Planning for manual positioning: The end-state comfort effect for manual abductionadduction. Experimental Brain Research, 184, 383-389.