Difficulties with subpectoral augmentation mammaplasty and its correction: The role of subglandular site change in revision aesthetic breast surgery

Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery

Volumn 125, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 363-371

  Lesavoy, Malcolm A ^a,b,c   Trussler, Andrew P ^a,b,c   Dickinson, Brian P ^a,b,c  

^a Los Angeles Medical Center ^*

^b UCLA MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BREAST AUGMENTATION; BREAST ENDOPROSTHESIS; CONTRACTURE; FEMALE; HUMAN; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY;

ADULT; AGED; BREAST IMPLANTATION; BREAST IMPLANTS; CONTRACTURE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MIDDLE AGED; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATIONS; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 75149142558     PISSN: 00321052     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181c2a4b0     Document Type: Article

References (29)

1. American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 11.7 million cosmetic procedures in 2007. Available at: http://www. surgery.org/press/news-release. php?iid-491.
2. Lesavoy MA. Breast augmentation techniques. In: Mathes SJ, ed. Plastic Surgery: Vol.6. Trunk and Lower Extremity. Philadelphia: Saunders; 2006:35-46.
3. Hidalgo DA. Breast augmentation: Choosing the optimal incision, implant, and pocket plane. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000; 105;2202-2216.
4. Biggs TM, Yarish RS. Augmentation mammaplasty: A comparative analysis. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1990;85:368-372.
5. Dempsey WC, Latham WD. Subpectoral implants in augmentation mammaplasty: Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1968;42:515-521.
6. Regnault R. Partially submuscular breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1977;59:72-76.
7. Tebbetts JB. Dual plane breast augmentation: Optimizing implant-soft-tissue relationships in a wide range of breast types. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;107:1255-1272.
8. Strasser EJ. Results of subglandular versus subpectoral augmentation over time: One surgeon's observations. Aesthetic Surg J. 2006;26:45-50.
9. Spear SL, Little JW III. Breast capsulorraphy. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1988;81:274-279.
10. Clarendon CCD. Implant descent: A complication of augmentation mammaplasty and its correction. Ann Plast Surg. 1988;21:452-457.
11. Troilius C. Correction of implant ptosis after a transaxillary subpectoral breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1996; 98:889-895.
12. Codner MA, Cohen AT, Hester TR. Complications in breast augmentation: Prevention and correction. Clin Plast Surg. 2001;28:587-595; discussion 596.
13. Spear SL, Dayan JH, Boque D, et al. The "neosubpectoral" pocket for the correction of symmastia. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;124:695-703.
14. Spear SL, Bogue DP, Thomassen JM. Synmastia after breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118 (7 Suppl.):168S-171S; discussion 172S-174S.
15. Gutowski KA, Mesna GT, Cunningham BL. Saline-filled breast implants: A Plastic Surgery Educational Foundation multicenter outcomes study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1997;100:1019-1027.
16. Cunningham BL, Lokeh A, Gutowski KA. Saline-filled breast implant safety and efficacy: A multicenter retrospective review. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;105:2143-2149; discussion 2150-2151.
17. Gabriel SE, Woods JE, O'Fallon M, Beard M, Kurland LJ, Melton JM III. Complications leading to surgery after breast implantation. N Engl J Med. 1997;336;677-682.
18. Mentor Corporation. Saline-Filled Breast Implant Surgery: Making an Informed Decision. Santa Barbara, Calif: Mentor Corporation; 2000:11-19.
19. McGhan Medical Corporation. Saline-Filled Breast Implant Surgery: Making an Informed Decision. Santa Barbara, Calif: McGhan Corporation; 2000:10-18.
20. Hammond D, Hidalgo D, Slavin S, Spear S, Tebbets J. Revising the unsatisfactory breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;104:277-283.
21. Becker H, Springer R. Prevention of capsular contracture. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103:1766-1768; discussion 1769-1774.
22. Tebbetts JB, Adams WP. Five critical decisions in breast augmentation using five measurements in 5 minutes: The high five decision support process. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2005;116: 2005-2016.
23. Baxter RA. Subfacial breast augmentation: Theme and variations. Aesthetic Surg J. 2005;25:447-453.
24. Spear SL, Carter ME, Ganz JC. The correction of capsular contracture by conversion to "dual-plane" positioning: Technique and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;118:103S-113S.
25. Tarpila E, Ghassemifar R, Fagrell D, Berggren A. Capsular contracture with textured versus smooth saline-filled implants for breast augmentation: A prospective clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;99:1934-1939.
26. Collis N, Coleman D, Foo I, Sharpe DT. Ten-year review of a prospective randomized controlled trial of textured versus smooth subglandular silicone gel breast implants. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2000;106:786-791.
27. Fagrell D, Berggren A, Tarpila E. Capsular contracture around saline-filled fine textured and smooth mammary implants: A prospective 7.5-year follow-up. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001;108:2108-2112; discussion 2113. (Pubitemid 34000863)
28. Barnsley GP, Sigurdson LJ, Barnsley SE. Textured surface breast implants in the prevention of capsular contracture among breast augmentation patients: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2006;117:2182-2190.
29. Baxter RA. Intracapsular allogenic dermal grafts for breast implant-related problems. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2003;112:1692-1696; discussion 1697-1698.