Estimation of wildlife hazard levels using interspecies correlation models and standard laboratory rodent toxicity data

Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health - Part A: Current Issues

Volumn 72, Issue 24, 2009, Pages 1604-1609

  Awkerman, Jill A ^a   Raimondo, Sandy ^a   Barron, MacE G ^a  

^a U S ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACUTE TOXICITY; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; ECOTOXICITY; HAZARD ASSESSMENT; HEALTH HAZARD; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; RISK ASSESSMENT; SPECIES COMPARISON; WILDLIFE;

ANIMALS; ANIMALS, LABORATORY; ANIMALS, WILD; DATA INTERPRETATION, STATISTICAL; ECOSYSTEM; ENVIRONMENTAL POLLUTANTS; HAZARDOUS SUBSTANCES; INORGANIC CHEMICALS; LETHAL DOSE 50; MICE; ORGANIC CHEMICALS; RATS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RODENTIA; SPECIES SPECIFICITY;

ANIMALIA; RATTUS; RATTUS NORVEGICUS; RODENTIA;

EID: 75149141869     PISSN: 15287394     EISSN: 10872620     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/15287390903232491     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Aldenberg, T., and Jaworska, J. S. 2000. Uncertainty of the hazardous concentration and fraction affected for normal species sensitivity distributions. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Safety 46:1-18.
2. Awkerman, J. A., Raimondo, S., and Barron, M. G. 2008. Development of species sensitivity distributions for wildlife using interspecies toxicity correlation models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42:3447-3452.
3. De Vries, P, Tamis, J. E., Murk, A. J., and Smit, M. G. D. 2008. Development and application of a species sensitivity distribution for temperatureinduced mortality in the aquatic environment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27:2591-2598.
4. De Zwart, D. 2002. Observed regularities in species sensitivity distributions for aquatic species. In Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology, eds. L. Posthuma, G. W. Suter, and T. P. Traas, pp. 133-154. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
5. Dyer, S. D., Versteeg, D. J., Belanger, S. E., Chaney, J. G., and Mayer F. L. 2006. Interspecies correlation estimates predict protective environmental concentrations. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40:3102-3111.
6. Dyer, S. D., Versteeg, D. J., Belanger, S. E., Chaney, J. G., Raimondo, S., and Barron, M. G. 2008. Comparison of species sensitivity distributions derived from interspecies correlation models to distributions used to derive water quality criteria. Environ. Sci. Technol. 42:3076-3083.
7. Grist, E. P. M., O'Hagan, A., Crane, M., Sorokin, N., Sims, I., and Whitehouse, P. 2006. Bayesian and time-independent species sensitivity distributions for risk assessment of chemicals. Environ. Sci. Technol. 40:395-401.
8. Insightful. 2001. S-plus programmer's guide. Seattle, WA: Insightful Corporation.
9. Kacew, S, and Festing, M. F. W. 1996. Role of rat strain in the differential sensitivity to pharmaceutical agents and naturally occurring substances. J. Toxicol. Environ. Health 47:1-30.
10. Kacew, S., Ruben, Z., and McConnell, R. F. 1995. Strain as a determinant factor in the differential responsiveness of rats to chemicals. Toxicol. Pathol. 23:701-714. (Pubitemid 2616002)
11. Klöting, I., Nitschke, C., and Van den Brandt, J. 2003. Impact of genetic profiles on experimental studies: outbred versus wild rats. Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol. 189:68-71.
12. Meyers, S. M., and Wolff, J. O. 1994. Comparative toxicity of azinphosmethyl to house mice, laboratory mice, deer mice, and gray-tailed voles. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 26:478-482.
13. Newman, M. C., Ownby, D. R., Mézin, L. C. A., Powell, D. C., Christensen, T. R. L., Lerberg, S. B., Anderson, B.-A., and Padma, T. V. 2002. Species sensitivity distributions in ecological risk assessment: Distributional assumptions, alternate bootstrap techniques, and estimation of adequate number of species. In Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology, eds. L. Posthuma, G. W. Suter, and T. P. Traas, pp. 119-132. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
14. Raimondo, S., Mineau, P., and Barron, M. G. 2007a. Estimation of chemical toxicity to wildlife species using interspecies correlation models. Environ. Sci. Technol. 41:5888-5894.
15. Raimondo, S., Vivian, D. N., and Barron, M. G. 2007b. Web-based interspecies correlation estimation (Web-ICE) for acute toxicity: User manual version 2.0. http://www.epa.gov/ceampubl/fchain/webice/WebICE-User-Manual.pdf
16. Raimondo, S., Vivian, D. N., Delos, C., and Barron, M. G. 2008. Protectiveness of species sensitivity distribution hazard concentrations for acute toxicity used in endangered species risk assessment. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 27:2599-2607.
17. Schafer, E. W., Jr. and Bowles, W. A., Jr. 2004. Toxicity, repellency or phytotoxicity of 979 chemicals to birds, mammals and plants, pp. 65-108. Fort Collins, CO: National Wildlife Research Center.
18. Schroer, A. F. W., Belgers, D., Brock, T. C. M., Matser, A. M., Maund, S. J., and Van den Brink, P. J. 2004. Comparison of laboratory single species and field population-level effects of the pyrethroid insecticide lambdacyhalothrin on freshwater invertebrates. Arch. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 46:324-335.
19. Sijm, D. T. H. M., van Wezel, A., and Crommentuijn, T., 2002. Environmental risk limits in the Netherlands. In Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology, eds. L. Posthuma, G. W. Suter, and T. P. Traas, pp. 221-254. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
20. Stephan, C. E. 2002. Use of species sensitivity distributions in the derivation of water quality protection criteria for aquatic life by the U. S. Environmental Protection Agency. In Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology, eds. L. Posthuma, G. W. Suter, and T. P. Traas, pp. 211-220. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
21. Smith, G. J. 1987. Pesticide use and toxicology in relation to wildlife: Organophosphorus and carbamate compounds. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service: Washington, DC.
22. Swanson, M. B., Davis, G. A., Kincaid, L. E., Schultz, T. W., Bartmess, J. E., Jones, S. L., and George, E. L. 1997. A screening method for ranking and scoring chemicals by potential human health and environmental impacts. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 16:372-383.
23. van den Brink, P. J., Posthuma, L., and Brock, T. C. M. 2002. The value of the species sensitivity distribution concept for predicting field effects: (Non-) confirmation of the concept using semi-field experiments. In Species sensitivity distributions in ecotoxicology, eds. L. Posthuma, G. W. Suter, and T. P. Traas, pp. 155-193. Boca Raton, FL: Lewis.
24. Versteeg, D. J., Belanger, S. E., and Carr, G. J. 1999. Understanding singlespecies and model ecosystem sensitivity: Data-based comparison. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 18:1329-1346.
25. Wheeler, J. R., Grist, E. P. M., Leung, K. M. Y., Morritt, D., and Crane, M. 2002. Species sensitivity distributions: Data and model choice. Mar. Poll. Bull. 45:192-202.
26. Zar, J. H. 1999. Biostatistical analysis, 4th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.