Group comparisons in the presence of missing data using latent variable modeling techniques

Structural Equation Modeling

Volumn 17, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 134-149

  Raykov, Tenko ^a   Marcoulides, George A ^b  

^a MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

FULL INFORMATION MAXIMUM LIKELIHOODS; GROUP IDENTITIES; INCOMPLETE DATA SETS; LATENT VARIABLE MODELING; META-ANALYSIS; MISSING DATA; MODEL FITTING; VARIABLE RELATIONSHIPS;

STATISTICAL METHODS;

EID: 75149118790     PISSN: 10705511     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/10705510903439136     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Allison, P. D. (2001). Missing data. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
2. Arbuckle, J. L. (1996). Full information estimation in the presence of incomplete data. In G. A. Marcoulides & R. E. Schumacher (Eds.), Advanced structural equation modeling: Issues and techniques (pp. 233-277). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
3. Bentler, P. M. (2004). EQS structural equation program manual. Encino, CA: Multivariate Software.
4. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York: Wiley.
5. Cheung, M. W. L., & Chan, W. (2005). Meta-analytic structural equation modeling: A two-stage approach. Psycho-logical Methods, 10, 40-64.
6. Collins, L., Schafer, J. L., & Kam, C.-H. (2001). A comparison of inclusive and restrictive strategies in modern missing data procedures. Psychological Methods, 6, 330-351.
7. Enders, C. (2006). Analyzing structural equation models with missing data. In G. R. Hancock & R. Mueller (Eds.), Structural equation modeling: A second course (pp. 313-342). Boston, MA: Information Age.
8. Hays, W. L. (1994). Statistics. Fort Worth, TX: Harcourt Brace Jovanovich.
9. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Wiley.
10. Horn, J. L. (1982). The aging of human abilities. In B. B. Wolman (Ed.), Handbook of developmental psychology (pp. 847-870). New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1996). LISREL8 user's reference guide. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
12. Kuehnel, S. (1988). Testing MANOVA designs with LISREL. Sociological Methods and Research, 16, 504-523.
13. Little, R. P., & Rubin, D. B. (2002). Statistical analysis with missing data. New York: Wiley.
14. Muthén, B. O. (2002). Beyond SEM: General latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika, 29, 81-117.
15. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2002). How to use a Monte Carlo study to decide on sample size and determine power. Structural Equation Modeling, 4, 599-620.
16. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2008). Mplus user's guide. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
17. Raudenbush, S., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear modeling. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
18. Raykov, T. (2001). Testing multivariable covariance structure and means hypotheses via structural equation. Structural Equation Modeling, 8, 224-257.
19. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2006). A first course in structural equation modeling (2nd ed.). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
20. Raykov, T., & Marcoulides, G. A. (2008). An introduction to applied multivariate analysis. New York: Taylor & Francis.
21. Roussas, G. G. (1997). A course in mathematical statistics. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
22. Schafer, J. L., & Graham, J. W. (2002). Missing data: Our view of the state of the art. Psychological Methods, 7, 147-177.