An Interdisciplinary Approach to Science, Mathematics, and Reading: Learning as Children Learn

School Science and Mathematics

Volumn 98, Issue 3, 1998, Pages 149-155

  Foss, Donna H ^a   Pinchback, Carolyn L ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 75049085207     PISSN: 00366803     EISSN: 19498594     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1949-8594.1998.tb17408.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Ashton, P.T. (1992). Editorial. Journal of Teacher Education, 43 (5), 322.
2. Caine, R.N., & Caine, G. (1991). Teaching and the human brain. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.
3. Barman, C.R. (1992). An evaluation of the use of a technique designed to assist prospective elementary teachers use the learning cycle with science textbooks. School Science and Mathematics, 92(2), 59–63.
4. Berlin, D.F. & White, A. L. (1995). Connecting school science and mathematics. In P. A. House and A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum (pp. 22–33). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
5. Cobb, P. (1988). The tension between theories of learning and instruction in mathematics education. Educational Psychologist, 23(2), 87–103.
6. Fosnot, C. T. (1989). Enquiring teacher, enquiring learners. New York: Teachers College Press.
7. Fresko, B., Ben-Chaim, D., & Carmeli, M. (1994). Consultant as co-teacher: An intervention for improving mathematics instruction. Journal of Education for Teaching, 20(1), 83–96.
8. Fullan, M. G. (1991). The new meaning of educational change. New York: Teachers College Press.
9. Goldin, G.A. (1990). Epistemology, constructivism, and discovery learning in mathematics. In R. B. Davis, C. A. Maher & N. Noddings (Eds.), Journal for research in mathematics education: Constructivists views on the teaching and learning of mathematics (pp. 31–47). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
10. Goodlad, J. I. (1984). A place called school. New York: McGraw-Hill.
11. Heimlich, J. E. & Pittelman, S. (1986). Semantic mapping: Classroom applications. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
12. Hodgson, T. R. (1995). Connections as problem-solving tools. In P. A. House and A. F. Coxford (Eds.), Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum (pp. 13–21). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
13. Lortie, D. (1975). School teacher: A sociology study. Chicago: University of Chicago.
14. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (1995). Position statement on interdisciplinary learning: Pre-K-4. Teaching Children Mathematics, 1(6), 386–387.
15. Nickson, M. (1992). The culture of the mathematics classroom: An unknown quantity? In D. A. Grouws (Ed.), Handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 101–114). New York: Macmillan Company.
16. Ogle, D. & Carr, E. (1987). K-W-L plus: A strategy for comprehension and summarization. Journal of Reading, 30(7), 626–631.
17. Rhone, L. (1995). Measurement in a primary-grade integrated curriculum. In P. A. House and A.F. Coxford (Eds.), Connecting Mathematics across the Curriculum (pp. 124–133). Reston, VA: National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
18. Semb, G. B., & Ellis, J. A. (1994). Knowledge taught in school: What is remembered? In F. B. Murray, and J. Raths (Eds.), Review of Educational Research (pp.253–286). Washington D.C.: American Educational Research Association.
19. White, A. M. (1985). Teaching as though students mattered. In J. Katz (Ed.), New Directions for Teaching and Learning (pp. 39–48). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.