A whole of population-based series of radical prostatectomy in Victoria, 1995 to 2000

Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health

Volumn 33, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 527-533

  Bolton, Damien ^a   Severi, Gianluca ^b,c   Millar, Jeremy L ^d,e   Kelsall, Helen ^b,e   Davidson, Adee Jonathan ^a   Smith, Charmaine ^b   Bagnato, Melisa ^b   Pedersen, John ^f   Giles, Graham ^b,c   Syme, Rodney ^g  

^a AUSTIN HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^b CANCER EPIDEMIOLOGY CENTRE   (Australia)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MELBOURNE   (Australia)

^d ALFRED HOSPITAL   (Australia)

^e MONASH UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^f Tissupath Pty Ltd   (Australia)

^g Epworth Freemasons Hospital   (Australia)

Author keywords

Population based register; Prostate cancer; Radical prostatectomy; Socio economic status

Indexed keywords

PROSTATE SPECIFIC ANTIGEN;

AGED; ARTICLE; AUSTRALIA; CANCER STAGING; HUMAN; ISOLATION AND PURIFICATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; REGISTER; SOCIAL CLASS; UTILIZATION REVIEW;

AGED; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; NEOPLASM STAGING; PROSTATE-SPECIFIC ANTIGEN; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; REGISTRIES; SOCIAL CLASS; VICTORIA;

EID: 74949143334     PISSN: 13260200     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1753-6405.2009.00448.x     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Australian Bureau of Statistics. Census of Population and Housing: Socio-Economic Indexes for Areas, Australia. Canberra (AUST): ABS; 2001. Catalogue No.: 2039.0.
2. Access Economics. Cost of Cancer in NSW [report on the Internet]. Sydney (AUST): The Cancer Council New South Wales; 2007 [cited 2009 April 30]. Available from: http://www.nswcc.org.au/html/policyaction/reports/downloads/ costofcancer-summary.pdf
3. Hayen A, Smith DP, Patel MI, O'Connell DL. Patterns of surgical care for prostate cancer in NSW, 1993-2002: rural/urban and socio-economic variation. Aust NZ J Public Health. 2008;32:417-20.
4. Lubeck DP, Litwin MS, Henning JM, Stier DM, et al. The CaPSURE database: a methodology for clinical practice and research in prostate cancer. CaPSURE Research Panel. Cancer of the Prostate Strategic Urologic Research Endeavor. Urology. 1996;48:773-7.
5. Eastham JA, Kattan MW, Riedel E, Begg CB, et al. Variations among individual surgeons in the rate of positive surgical margins in radical prostatectomy specimens. J Urol. 2003;170:2292-5.
6. Amling CL, Blute ML, Bergstralh EJ, Seay TM, et al. Long-term hazard of progression after radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer: continued risk of biochemical failure after 5 years. J Urol. 2000;164:101-5.
7. Han M, Partin AW, Zahurak M, Piantadosi S, et al. Biochemical (prostate specific antigen) recurrence probability following radical prostatectomy for clinically localized prostate cancer. J Urol. 2003;169:517-23.
8. Porter CR, Kodama K, Gibbons RP, Correa R Jr, et al. 25-year prostate cancer control and survival outcomes: a 40-year radical prostatectomy single institution series. J Urol. 2006; 176:569-74.
9. Roehl KA, Han M, Ramos CG, Antenor JA, et al. Cancer progression and survival rates following anatomical radical retropubic prostatectomy in 3,478 consecutive patients: long-term results. J Urol. 2004; 172:910-4.
10. Carver BS, Bianco FJ Jr, Scardino PT, Eastham JA. Long-term outcome following radical prostatectomy in men with clinical stage T3 prostate cancer. J Urol. 2006;176:564-8.
11. Tollefson MK, Leibovich BC, Slezak JM, Zincke H, et al. Long-term prognostic significance of primary Gleason pattern in patients with Gleason score 7 prostate cancer: impact on prostate cancer specific survival. J Urol. 2006; 175:547-51.
12. Hankey BF, Feuer EJ, Clegg LX, Hayes RB, et al. Cancer surveillance series: interpreting trends in prostate cancer-part I: Evidence of the effects of screening in recent prostate cancer incidence, mortality, and survival rates. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999;91:1017-24.
13. Ghani KR, Grigor K, Tulloch DN, Bollina PR, et al. Trends in reporting Gleason score 1991 to 2001: changes in the pathologist's practice. Eur Urol. 2005;47:196-201.
14. Albertsen PC, Hanley JA, Barrows GH, Penson DF, et al. Prostate cancer and the Will Rogers phenomenon. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1248-53.
15. Thompson IM, Canby-Hagino E, Lucia MS. Stage migration and grade inflation in prostate cancer: Will Rogers meets Garrison Keillor. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2005;97:1236-7.
16. Egevad L, Allsbrook WC Jr, Epstein JI. Current practice of Gleason grading among genitourinary pathologists. Hum Pathol. 2005;36:5-9.
17. Park HK, Choe G, Byun SS, Lee HW, et al. Evaluation of concordance of Gleason score between prostatectomy and biopsies that show more than two different Gleason scores in positive cores. Urology. 2006;67:110-4.
18. Poulos CK, Daggy JK, Cheng L. Preoperative prediction of Gleason grade in radical prostatectomy specimens: the influence of different Gleason grades from multiple positive biopsy sites. Mod Pathol. 2005; 18:228-34.
19. San Francisco IF, DeWolf WC, Rosen S, Upton M, et al. Extended prostate needle biopsy improves concordance of Gleason grading between prostate needle biopsy and radical prostatectomy. J Urol. 2003; 169:136-40.