Fuzzy logic for watershed assessment

Watershed Management and Operations Management 2000

Volumn 105, Issue , 2004, Pages

  Guertin, D Phillip ^a   Fiedler, Reno H ^a   Miller, Scott N ^b   Goodrich, David C ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b CARL HAYDEN BEE RESEARCH CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Assessments; Fuzzy sets; Geographic information systems; Riparian waters; Watersheds

Indexed keywords

ANALYTICAL HIERARCHY PROCESS; ARIZONA; ASSESSMENTS; ENVIRONMENTAL FACTORS; FUZZY LOGIC APPROACH; FUZZY MEMBERSHIP FUNCTION; RIPARIAN RESTORATION; RIPARIAN WATERS; SPATIAL ANALYSIS; SPATIAL INFORMATIONS; WATERSHED ASSESSMENT; WATERSHED CHARACTERISTICS; WEIGHTED INDEX;

FUZZY SETS; GEOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION SYSTEMS; LANDFORMS; MEMBERSHIP FUNCTIONS; SOIL CONSERVATION; WATER CONSERVATION; WATER MANAGEMENT; WATERSHEDS;

FUZZY LOGIC;

EID: 74949135911     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1061/40499(2000)88     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Bandemer, H. and S. Gottwald. 1995. Fuzzy Sets, Fuzzy Logic, Fuzzy Methods with Applications. John Wiley and Sons Inc., Chichester, England.
2. Bonham-Carter, G.F. 1994. Geographic Information Systems for Geoscientists. Elsevier Science Inc, Tarrytown, New York.
3. nd Ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames, Iowa.
4. Burrough, P.A. and R.A. McDonnell. 1998. Principles of Geographical Information Systems. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
5. Carra, A., M. Cardinali, R. Detti, F. Guzzetti, V. Pasqui and P. Reichenback. 1991. GIS techniques and statistical models in evaluating landslide hazard. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms 16: 427-445.
6. Davis, T.J. and C.P. Keller. 1997. Modelling uncertainty in natural resource analysis using fuzzy sets and Monte Carlo simulation: Slope stability prediction. International Journal of Geographical Information Systems 11(5): 4090-434.
7. Elmore, F.H., 1976. Shrubs and Trees of the Southwest Uplands. Southwest Parks and Monuments Association. Tucson, AZ.
8. Falk, D.A., M.K. Briggs, and W.L. Halvorson. 1998. The Riparian Restoration Ranking (R3) System: User's Manual. Report submitted to the U.S. Forest Service, Region III by the Society for Ecological Restoration, The University of Arizona, Tucson AZ 85721.
9. Forest Practices Code. 1995. Interior watershed assessment procedure guidebook: Level 1 Analysis. Forest Practices Code of British Columbia and BC Environment, British Columbia.
10. Guertin, D.P., S.N. Miller and D.C. Goodrich. 2000. Emerging tools and technologies in watershed management. In: USDA Forest Service Proceedings RMRS-P-13: 194-204.
11. nd International Conference on Multiple Objective Decision Support Systems, August, 1999, Bisbane Australia.
12. Merrill, R. K., 1970. The Glacial Geology of the Mount Baldy Area, Apache County, Arizona. Unpublished Master's Thesis. Arizona State University. Tempe, Arizona.
13. Montgomery, D.R., W.E. Dietrich and K.Sullivan. 1997. The role of GIS in watershed analysis. In: Land Monitoring, Modelling, and Analysis, S.N. Lane, K.S.
14. Richards, and J.H. Chandler (eds.), John Wiley & Sons, Inc. New York, New York, pp. 241-261.
15. Openshaw, S. and C. Openshaw. 1997. Artificial Intelligence in Geography. John Wiley & Sons, New York, New York.
16. Sheng, T.C., R.E. Barrett, and T.R. Mitchell. 1997. Using geographic information systems for watershed classification and rating in developing counties. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 52(20: 84-89.
17. Sulaiman, W.N.A. 1995. An information system for watershed planning. In: Proceedings of Regional Conference on Water Resources Management, Isfahan, Iran, 1995. pp. 537-547.
18. U.S. Forest Service. 1980. An approach to water resources evaluation of nonpoint silvicultural sources. Environmental Protection Agency, Athens, GA. EPA-600/8-80-012.
19. Warren, S.D., V.E. Diersing, P.J. Thompson and W. D. Goran. 1989. An erosion-based land classification system for military installations. Environmental Management 13(2): 251-257.
20. Zadeh, L.A. 1965. Fuzzy sets. Information and Control 8: 338-353.