'Some people are never going to be able to do that'. Challenges for people with intellectual disability in the 21st century

Disability and Society

Volumn 24, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 571-584

  Dowse, Leanne ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Australia; Governance; Intellectual disability; Neo liberalism; Privatisation; UK

Indexed keywords

EID: 74949130212     PISSN: 09687599     EISSN: 13600508     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09687590903010933     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Aspis, S. 1997. Self-advocacy for people with learning difficulties: Does it have a future? Disability & Society 12, no. 4: 647-54.
2. Baistow, K. 1995. Liberation and regulation? Some paradoxes of empowerment. Critical Social Policy 42: 34-45.
3. Beck, U. 1992. Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage.
4. Beck, U. 1994. The reinvention of politics: Towards a theory of reflexive modernization. In Reflexive modernization: Politics, tradition and aesthetics in the modern social order, ed. U. Beck, A. Giddens, and S. Lash. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
5. Beeson, M., and A. Firth. 1998. Neoliberalism as a political rationality: Australian public policy since the 1980s. Journal of Sociology 34, no. 3: 215-31.
6. Burton, M., and C. Kagan. 2006. Decoding Valuing people. Disability & Society 21, no. 4: 299-313.
7. Cruikshank, B. 1993. Revolutions within: Self-government and self-esteem. Economy and Society 22, no. 3: 327-44.
8. Cruikshank, B. 1999. The will to empower: Democratic citizens and other subjects. New York: Cornell University Press.
9. Dean, M. 1999. Governmentality: Power and rule in modern society. London: Sage.
10. Department of Health. 2001. Valuing people: A new strategy for learning disability for the 21st century. London: Department of Health.
11. Farnsworth, K., and C. Holden. 2006. The business-social policy nexus: Corporate power and corporate inputs into social policy. Journal of Social Policy 35, no. 3: 473-94.
12. Giddens, A. 1990. The consequences of modernity. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
13. Giddens, A. 1998. Risk society: The context of British politics. London: Polity Press.
14. Hamilton, C., and S. Maddison. 2007. Silencing dissent: How the Australian government is controlling public opinion and stifling debate. Sydney: Allen & Unwin.
15. Harris, J. 2003. The social work business. London: Routledge.
16. Hartman, Y. 2005. In bed with the enemy: Some ideas on the connections between neoliberal- ism and the welfare State. Current Sociology 53, no. 1: 57-73.
17. Hindess, B. 1997. Politics and governmentality. Economy and Society 26, no. 2: 257-72.
18. Hindess, B. 1998. Neo-liberalism and the national economy. In Governing Australia: Studies in contemporary rationalities of government, ed. M. Dean and B. Hindess. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
19. Holden, C., and P. Beresford. 2002. Globalization and disability. In Disability studies today, ed. C. Barnes, M. Oliver, and L. Barton. Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
20. Kemshall, H., and R. Littlechild, eds. 2000. User involvement and participation in social care. London: Jessica Kingsley.
21. Kober, R., and I. Eggleton. 2006. Using quality of life to assess performance in the disability services sector. Applied Research in Quality of Life 1: 63-77.
22. Levitas, R. 1996. The concept of social exclusion and the new Durkheimian hegemony. Critical Social Policy 16, no. 1: 5-20.
23. Levitas, R. 1999. Defining and measuring social exclusion: A critical overview of current proposals. Radical Statistics 71. http://www.radstats.org.uk/no071/ article072.htm.
24. Lupton, D. 1999. Risk. London: Routledge.
25. Martin, R. 2003. A real life-a real community: The empowerment and full participation of people with an intellectual disability in their community. Paper presented at the 16th Asian Conference on Mental Retardation, August 20-25, in Tokyo, Japan.
26. Meekosha, H., and L. Dowse. 2007. Integrating critical disability studies into social work education and practice: An Australian perspective. Practice 19, no. 3: 59-72.
27. New South Wales Council for Intellectual Disability (NSWCID). 2002. The tendering process: A position paper. NSWCID. http//:www.nswcidorg.au/StdEng/publications.html.
28. O'Malley, P. 1992. Risk, power and crime prevention. Economy and Society 21, no. 2: 252-75.
29. Priestley, M. 2001. Disability and the life course: Global perspectives. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
30. Pusey, M. 1991. Economic rationalism in Canberra. A nation-building state changes its mind. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
31. Quiggan, J. 2001. Demography and the new economy. Journal of Population Research 18, no. 2: 177-93.
32. Rioux, M.H., and E. Zubrow. 2001. Social disability and the public good. In The market and the public domain: Global governance and the asymmetry of power, ed. D. Drache, 148-71. London: Routledge.
33. Rose, N. 1998. Governing risky individuals: The role of psychiatry in new regimes of control. Psychiatry, Psychology and Law 5, no. 2: 177-95.
34. Rose, N., and P. Miller. 1992. Political power beyond the state: Problematics of government. British Journal of Sociology 43, no. 2: 173-205.
35. Russell, M. 1999. Inequality, neo-liberalism, and disability. Disability Studies Quarterly 19, no. 4: 370-83.
36. Russell, M., and R. Malhotra. 2002. Capitalism and disability: Advances and contradictions. Socialist Register. York University, Canada. http://www.yorku.ca/socreg//RusMal.htm.
37. Smyth, P., and M. Wearing. 2003. After the welfare state? In Economic governance and institutional dynamics, ed. S. Bell. Melbourne, Australia: Oxford University Press.
38. Stone, E. 1999. Disability and development: Learning from action and research on disability in the majority world. Leeds, UK: The Disability Press.
39. Thomas, C., and M. Corker. 2002. A journey around the social model. In Disability/postmo- dernity: Embodying disability theory, ed. M. Corker and T. Shakespeare. London: Continuum.
40. Tomlinson, J. 2001. Income security: The basic income alternative. Brisbane: Queensland University of Technology.
41. van Gramberg, B., and P. Bassett. 2005. Neoliberalism and the third sector in Australia, School of Management Working Paper Series. Melbourne, Australia: Victoria University of Technology.
42. Wasserman, D. 2001 Philosophical issues in the definition and social response to disability. In Handbook of disability studies, ed. G. Albrecht, K. Sleeman, and M. Bury, 219-51. London: Sage.
43. Wearing, M., and L. Dowse. 2000. Risk in practice, risk in theory: Ulrich Beck and the sub- politics of welfare. Paper presented at the Sociological Sites/Sights, The Australian Sociological Association, December 6-8, in Adelaide, Australia.
44. Williams, F. 2004. What matters is who works: Why every child matters to New Labour. Commentary on the DfES Green Paper Every Child Matters. Critical Social Policy 24, no. 3: 406-27.
45. Williams, F., J. Popay, and A. Oakley. 1999. Changing paradigms of welfare. In Welfare research: A critical review, ed. F. Williams, J. Popay, and A. Oakley. London: University College London Press.
46. Wills, R., and L. Chenoweth. 2005. Support or compliance. In Allies in emancipation: Shifting from providing service to being of support, ed. P. O'Brien and M. Sullivan, Chapter 4. Melbourne, Australia: Thomson/Dunmore Press.
47. Wilson, A., S. Riddell, and S. Baron. 2000. Welfare for those who can? The impact of the quasi-market on the lives of people with learning difficulties. Critical Social Policy 20: 479-502.
48. Wright, J. 2003. The ethics of economic rationalism. Sydney: University of New South Wales Press.
49. Yeatman, A. 1998. Interpreting contemporary contractualism. In Governing Australia: Studies in contemporary rationalities of government, ed. M. Dean and B. Hindness. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.