Greening Garhwal through stakeholder engagement: The role of ecofeminism, community and the state in sustainable development

Sustainable Development

Volumn 18, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 12-19

  Pandey, Anupam ^a  

^a CARLETON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

Community participation; Ecofeminism; Environmental protection; Garhwal himalayas; Post development discourse; Role of state; Stakeholder engagement; Sustainable development

Indexed keywords

CIVIL SOCIETY; DEVELOPMENT DISCOURSE; ECOFEMINISM; ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; LOCAL PARTICIPATION; PARTICIPATORY APPROACH; STAKEHOLDER; STATE ROLE; SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT; SUSTAINABLE FORESTRY;

GARHWAL HIMALAYAS; HIMALAYAS; INDIA; UTTARAKHAND;

EID: 74949116358     PISSN: 09680802     EISSN: 10991719     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sd.393     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Chakarbaraty D. 1995. Radical histories and question of enlightenment rationalism: some recent critiques of subaltern studies. Economic and Political Weekly 8 April: 751-789.
2. Chatterjee P. 1993. The Nation and its Fragments. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
3. Datta S, Varalakshmi V. 1999. Decentralisation: an effective method of financial management at the grassroots (evidence from India). Sustain- able Development 7: 113-120.
4. Escobar A. 1995. Encountering Development: the Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ.
5. Graf WD. 1995. The state in the Third World. In Socialist Register, Panitch L, Colin L (eds). Merlin Press: London; 140-162.
6. Guha R. 1991. The Unquiet Woods: Ecological Change and Peasant Resistance in the Garhwal Himalayas. Oxford University Press: Delhi.
7. Maikhuri RK, Rana U, Semwal RL, Rao KS. 2000. Agriculture in Uttarakhand: issues and management prospects for economic development. In Uttarakhand: Statehood and Dimensions of Development, Sati MC, Sati SP. Indus: New Delhi; 151-172.
8. Mellor M. 1997. Feminism and Ecology. New York University Press: New York.
9. Nanda N. 1991. Forests for Whom? Destruction and Restoration in the U.P. Himalayas. Har-Anand: New Delhi.
10. Plumwood V. 1993. Feminism and the Mastery of Nature. Routledge: London.
11. Plumwood V. 2000. Integrating ethical frameworks for animals, humans and nature: a critical feminist eco-socialist analysis. Ethics and the Environment 5(2): 285-322.
12. Salleh A. 1997. Ecofeminism as Politics: Nature, Marx and the Postmodern. Zed: London.
13. Scott CJ. 1998. Seeing Like a State: How Certain Schemes to Improve the Human Condition Have Failed. Yale University Press: New Haven, CT.
14. Sethi P, Khan H. 2001. Structural financial empowerment for localised development within joint forest management (JFM): examples from Madhya Pradesh, India. Sustainable Development 9: 87-102.
15. Sivaramakrishnan KM. 1999. Forests: Statemaking and Environmental Change in Colonial Eastern India. Stanford University Press: Stanford, CA.
16. Stokke K, Mohan G. 2001. The convergence around local civil society and the dangers of localism. Social Scientist 29(11/12): 3-20.
17. Warren K. 1993. A philosophical perspective on ecofeminist spiritualities. In Ecofeminism and the Sacred, Adams CJ (ed.). Indiana University Press: Bloomington, IN; 119-132.
18. Warren K. 1994. Ecological Feminism. Routledge: London.