The involuntary nature of conversion disorder

Neurology

Volumn 74, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 223-228

  Voon, V ^a   Gallea, C ^a   Hattori, N ^a   Bruno, M ^a   Ekanayake, V ^b   Hallett, M ^a  

^a NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF NEUROLOGICAL DISORDERS AND STROKE   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CEREBELLUM CORTEX; CINGULATE GYRUS; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CONVERSION DISORDER; CORPUS STRIATUM; DIAGNOSTIC AND STATISTICAL MANUAL OF MENTAL DISORDERS; ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAM; FEMALE; FUNCTIONAL MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; HUMAN; INVOLUNTARY MOVEMENT; MALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SENSORIMOTOR CORTEX; TREMOR;

EID: 74949105990     PISSN: 00283878     EISSN: 1526632X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e3181ca00e9     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Blakemore SJ, Goodbody SJ, Wolpert DM. Predicting the consequences of our own actions: the role of sensorimotor context estimation. J Neurosci 1998;18:7511-7518.
2. Blakemore SJ, Sirigu A. Action prediction in the cerebellum and in the parietal lobe. Exp Brain Res 2003;153: 239-245.
3. Desmurget M, Reilly KT, Richard N, Szathmari A, Mot-tolese C, Sirigu A. Movement intention after parietal cortex stimulation in humans. Science 2009;324:811-813.
4. Farrer C, Franck N, Georgieff N, Frith CD, Decety J, Jean-nerod M. Modulating the experience of agency: a positron emission tomography study. Neuroimage 2003;18:324-333.
5. Farrer C, Frey SH, Van Horn JD, et al. The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations. Cereb Cortex 2008;18:254-261.
6. Decety J, Lamm C. The role of the right temporoparietal junction in social interaction: how low-level computational processes contribute to meta-cognition. Neuroscien-tist 2007;13:580-593.
7. Fink GR, Marshall JC, Halligan PW, et al. The neural consequences of conflict between intention and the senses. Brain 1999;122(pt 3):497-512.
8. Williams DT, Ford B, Fahn S. Phenomenology and psy-chopathology related to psychogenic movement disorders. Adv Neurol 1995;65:231-257.
9. Bhatia KP, Schneider SA. Psychogenic tremor and related disorders. J Neurol 2007;254:569-574
10. Hallett M, Cloninger CR, Fahn S, Jankovic J, Lange AE, Yudofsky SC, eds. Psychogenic Movement Disorders. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005.
11. Krem MM. Motor conversion disorders reviewed from a neu-ropsychiatric perspective. J Clin Psychiatry 2004;65:783-790.
12. Marshall JC, Halligan PW, Fink GR, Wade DT, Frackow-iak RS. The functional anatomy of a hysterical paralysis. Cognition 1997;64:B1-B8.
13. Spence SA, Crimlisk HL, Cope H, Ron MA, Grasby PM. Discrete neurophysiological correlates in prefrontal cortex during hysterical and feigned disorder of movement. Lancet 2000;355:1243-1244.
14. Vuilleumier P, Chicherio C, Assal F, Schwartz S, Slosman D, Landis T. Functional neuroanatomical correlates of hysterical sensorimotor loss. Brain 2001;124:1077-1090.
15. Cojan Y, Waber L, Carruzzo A, Vuilleumier P. Motor inhibition in hysterical conversion paralysis. Neuroimage 2009;47:1026-1037.
16. Stone J, Zeman A, Simonotto E, et al. FMRI in patients with motor conversion symptoms and controls with simulated weakness. Psychosom Med 2007;69:961-969.
17. Kanaan RA, Craig TK, Wessely SC, David AS. Imaging repressed memories in motor conversion disorder. Psycho-som Med 2007;69:202-205.
18. Ghaffar O, Staines WR, Feinstein A. Unexplained neurologic symptoms: an fMRI study of sensory conversion disorder. Neurology 2006;67:2036-2038.
19. Farrer C, Frey SH, Van Horn JD, et al. The angular gyrus computes action awareness representations. Cereb Cortex 2008;18:254-261.
20. Scholz J, Triantafyllou C, Whitfield-Gabrieli S, Brown EN, Saxe R. Distinct regions of right temporo-parietal junction are selective for theory of mind and exogenous attention. PLoS One 2009;4:e4869.
21. Mitchell JP. Activity in right temporo-parietal junction is not selective for theory-of-mind. Cereb Cortex 2008;18: 262-271.
22. Blanke O, Landis T, Spinelli L, Seeck M. Out-of-body experience and autoscopy of neurological origin. Brain 2004;127:243-258.
23. De Ridder D, Van Laere K, Dupont P, Menovsky T, Van de Heyning P. Visualizing out-of-body experience in the brain. N Engl J Med 2007;357:1829-1833.
24. Blanke O, Mohr C, Michel CM, et al. Linking out-of-body experience and self processing to own-body imagery at the temporoparietal junction. J Neurosci 2005; 25:550-557.
25. Shenker JI, Wylie SA, Fuchs K, Manning CA, Heilman KM. On-line anosognosia: unawareness for chorea in real time but not on videotape delay. Neurology 2004;63: 159-160.
26. Marshall JC, Halligan PW, Fink GR, Wade DT, Frackow-iak RS. The functional anatomy of a hysterical paralysis. Cognition 1997;64:B1-B8.
27. de Lange FP, Roelofs K, Toni I. Increased self-monitoring during imagined movements in conversion paralysis. Neu-ropsychologia 2007;45:2051-2058.