Comparative leaf surface morphology and molecular data of five oaks of the subgenus Quercus Oerst (Fagaceae)

Plant Biosystems

Volumn 143, Issue 3, 2009, Pages 543-554

  Fortini, P ^a   Viscosi, V ^a   Maiuro, L ^a   Fineschi, S ^b   Vendramin, G G ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MOLISE   (Italy)

^b INSTITUTE FOR SUSTAINABLE PLANT PROTECTION   (Italy)

^c CNR   (Italy)

Author keywords

Leaf surface morphology; Molecular taxonomy; Quercus; Statistical analysis; Stomata; Trichome

Indexed keywords

FAGACEAE; QUERCUS; QUERCUS FRAINETTO; QUERCUS PETRAEA; QUERCUS PUBESCENS; QUERCUS ROBUR; QUERCUS VIRGILIANA;

EID: 74949104600     PISSN: 11263504     EISSN: 17245575     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/11263500902722980     Document Type: Article

References (56)

1. Abbate G, Bonacquisti S, Scassellati E. 2002. Morphological study of three taxa of genus Rubus L. sect. Rubus (Rosaceae) in Western-Central Italy. Plant Bios 136(3): 321-330.
2. Ávalos SV, Salinas AD. 2003. Los tricomas foliares en la caracterización de un grupo de especies del género Quercus, sección Lobatae (Fagaceae). Anales del Instituto de Biología, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Ser Botánica 74: 5-15.
3. Axelrod DJ. 1983. Biogeography of oaks in the Arcto-Tertiary Province. Ann Mo Botanical Garden 70: 629-657.
4. Bacic T. 1996. Note on use of some micro-morphological features in distinction of three pubescent oaks in Croatia. Acta Biol Cracov Ser Botanica 38: 1-67.
5. Bacilieri R, Docousso A, Petit RJ, Kremer A. 1996. Mating system and asymmetric hybridization in a mix stand of European oaks. Evol 50: 900-908.
6. Bellarosa R, Simeone MC, Papini A, Schirone B. 2005. Utility of ITS sequence data for phylogenetic reconstruction of Italian Quercus spp. Mol Phylogenet Evol 34: 355-370.
7. Blasi C, Di Pietro R, Filesi L. 2004. Syntaxonomical revision of Quercetalia pubescenti-petraeae in the Italian peninsula. Fitosociologia 41(1): 87-164.
8. Bodénès C, Labbé T, Pradère S, Kremer A. 1997. General vs. local differentiation between two closely related white oak species. Mol Ecol 6: 713-724.
9. Brewer S, Cheddadi R, Beaulieu JL, Reille M. 2002. The spread of deciduous Quercus throughout Europe since the last glacial period. Forest Ecol Manag 156: 27-48.
10. Bruschi P, Vendramin GG, Bussotti F, Grossoni P. 2000. Morphological and molecular differentiation between Q. petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Q. pubescens Willd. (Fagaceae) in Northern and Central Italy. Ann Bot 85: 325-333.
11. Burger WC. 1975. The species concept in Quercus. Taxon 24: 45-50.
12. Bussotti F, Grossoni P. 1997. European and Mediterranean oaks (Quercus L.; Fagaceae): SEM characterization of the micromorphology of the abaxial leaf surface. Bot J Linn Soc 124: 183-199.
13. Camus A. 1936-54. Le Chénes: Monographie du genere Quercus. vol. I-III. Paris: P. Lechevalier.
14. Coart E, Lamote V, De Loose M. 2002. AFLP markers demonstrate local genetic differentiation between two indigenous oak species [Quercus robur L. and Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl.] in Flemish populations. Theor Appl Genet 105: 431-439.
15. Corcuera L, Camarero JJ, Gil-Pelegrín E. 2002. Functional groups in Quercus species derived from the analysis of pressure-volume curves. Trees 16(7): 465-472.
16. Curtu AL, Gailing O, Leinemann L, Finkeldey R. 2007. Genetic variation and differentiation within a natural community of five oak species (Quercus spp.). Plant Biol 9: 116-126.
17. D'Andrea S, Caramiello R, Ghignone S, Siniscalco C. 2003. Systematic studies on some species of the genus Artemisia: Biomolecular analysis. Plant Bios 137(2): 121-130.
18. Dow BD, Ashley MV. 1996. Microsatellite analysis of seed dispersal and parentage of sapling in bur oak, Quercus macrocarpa. Mol Ecol 5: 120-130.
19. Dumolin-Lapègue S, Kremer A, Petit RJ. 1999. Are chloroplast and mitochondrial DNA variation species-independent in oaks? Evol 53: 1406-1413.
20. Excoffier L, Smouse PE, Quattro JM. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA data. Genet 131: 479-491.
21. Ferris C, Oliver RP, Davy AJ, Hewitt GM. 1993. Native oak chloroplasts reveal an ancient divide across Europe. Mol Ecol 2(6): 337-344.
22. Fici S. 2004. Micromorphological observations on leaf and pollen of Capparis L. sect. Capparis (Capparaceae). Plant Bios 138(2): 125-134.
23. Fineschi S, Taurchini D, Grossoni P, Petit RJ, Vendramin GG. 2002. Chloroplast DNA variation of white oaks in Italy. Forest Ecol Manag 156: 103-114.
24. Fineschi S, Vendramin GG. 2004. La diversità cloroplastica delle querce italiane: evidenze di una maggiore ricchezza genetica nelle popolazioni meridionali e insulari. Forest@ 1: 82-87.
25. Gellini R, Bussotti F, Bettini D, Grossoni P, Bottacci F. 1992. Species of the genus Quercus in Italy: characterization by means of leaf surface observation. Giore Bot Ital 126: 481-504.
26. Gömöry D, Yakovlev I, Zhelev P, Jedináková J, Paule L. 2001. Genetic differentiation of oak populations within the Quercus robur/Quercus petraea complex in Central and Eastern Europe. Heredity 86: 557-563.
27. Hardin JW. 1976. Terminology and classification of Quercus trichomes. J Mitchell Soc 92: 151-161.
28. Hardin JW. 1979. Patterns of variation in foliar trichomes of eastern North American Quercus. Am J Bot 66: 576-585.
29. Kampfer S, Lexer C, Glössl J, Steinkellner H. 1998. Characterization of (GA)n microsatellite loci from Quercus robur. Hereditas 129: 183-186.
30. Kissling P. 1977. Les poils des quatre espéces de chênes du Jura (Quercus pubescens, Q. petraea, Q. robur et Q. cerris). Berichte der schweizerischen botanischen Gesellschaft 87: 1-18.
31. Kremer A, Kleinschmit J, Cottrell J, Cundall EP, Deans JD, Ducousso A, et al. 2002. Is there a correlation between chloroplastic and nuclear divergence, or what are the roles of history and selection on genetic diversity in European oaks? Forest Ecol Manag 156: 75-87.
32. Langella O. 2002. Populations 1.2.28. Logiciel de génétique des populations. Laboratoire Populations, génétique et évolution. CNRS UPR 9034. Gif-surYvette. Available from http://www.pge.cnrsgif.fr/BIOINFO/POPULATIONS. INDEX.PHP
33. Llamas F, Perez-Morales C, Acedo C, Penas A. 1995. Foliar trichomes of the evergreen and semideciduous species of the genus Quercus (Fagaceae) in the Iberian Peninsula. Bot J Linn Soc 117: 47-57.
34. Manos PS. 1993. Foliar trichome variation in Quercus section Protobalanus (Fagaceae). Sida 15: 391-403.
35. Minuto L, Grassi F, Casazza G. 2006. Ecogeographic and genetic evaluation of endemic species in the Maritime Alps: The case of Moehringia lebrunii and M. sedoides (Caryophyllaceae). Plant Bios 140(2): 146-155.
36. Muir G, Fleming CC, Schlötterer C. 2001. Three divergent rDNA clusters predate the species divergence in Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. and Quercus robur L. Mol Biol Evol 18: 112-119.
37. Muir G, Schlötterer C. 2005. Evidence for shared ancestral polymorphism rather than recurrent gene flow at microsatellite loci differentiating two hybridizing oaks (Quercus spp.). Mol Ecol 14: 549-561.
38. Nei M. 1972. Genetic distance between populations. Am Nat 106: 283-292.
39. Nixon KC. 1993. Infrageneric classification of Quercus (Fagaceae) and typification of sectional names. Ann Sci Forestières 50: 25-34.
40. Page RD. 2001. TreeView 1.4 software, University of Glasgow, UK Available: http://darwin.zoology.gla.ac.uk/~rpage/treeviewx/download.html.
41. Pénas Merino A, Llamas F, Pérez Morales C, Acedo C. 1994. Aportaciones al conocimiento del genero Quercus en la Cordillera Cantabrica. I. Tricomas foliares de las especies caducifolias. Lagascalia 17: 311-324.
42. Petit RJ, Brewer S, Bordàcs S, Burg K, Cheddadi R, Coart E, et al. 2002. Identification of refugia and post-glacial colonisation routes of European white oaks based on chloroplast DNA and fossil pollen evidence. Forest Ecol Manag 156: 49-74.
43. Pignatti S. 1982. Flora d'Italia. vol. I. Bologna: Edagricole.
44. Safou O, Saint-Martin M. 1989. Le trichome foliaire de quelques Quercus. Bulletin de la Société botanique de France 136: 291-304.
45. Safou O, Saint-Martin M, Rouane P. 1988. Stomates et cires dans le genre Quercus. Comptes Rendus Del Academie Des Sciences. Paris 307 (Series III): 701-707.
46. Samuel R. 1999. Identification of hybrids between Quercus petraea and Q. robur (Fagaceae): Results obtained with RAPD markers confirm allozyme studies based on the Got-2 locus. Plant Syst Evol 217: 137-146.
47. Schwarz O. 1937. Monographie der Eichen Europas und des Mettelmeergebietes. Feddes Repert. (Sonderbeih D) 1: 1-200.
48. Schwarz O. 1964. Quercus L. In: Tutin TG, Heywood VH, Burges NA, Valentine DH, Walters SM, Webb DA, editors. Flora Europaea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. vol. 1, pp. 61-64.
49. Schwarz O. 1993. Quercus L. In: Tutin TG, Burges NA, Chater AO, Edmondson JR, Heywood VH, Moore DM, et al., editors. Flora Europaea. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. vol. 1, pp. 72-76.
50. Selvi F, Signorini MA, Cozzolino S. 2008. Classificazione, nomenclatura, studio della variabilità. In: Pasqua G, Abbate G, Forni C, editors. Botanica generale e diversità vegetale. Piccin. pp. 283-318.
51. Spellenberg R. 1995. On the hybrid nature of Quercus basaseachi- censis (Fagaceae, sect. Quercus). Sida 16: 427-434.
52. Spellenberg R. 1998. Quercus lesueri, un miembro meridional del complejo de Q. x undulata (Fagaceae, subgénero Quercus). Acta Botánica Mex 42: 25-33.
53. Spellenberg R, Bacon YJR. 1996. Taxonomy and distribution of a natural group of black oaks of Mexico Quercus, section Lobatae, (subsection Racemiflorae). Syst Bot 21: 85-99.
54. Steinkellner H, Fluch S, Turetschek E, Lexer C, Streiff R, Kremer A, et al. 1997. Identification and characterization of (GA/CT)n microsatellite loci from Quercus petraea. Plant Mol Biol 33: 1093-1096.
55. Thomson PM, Mohlenbrock RH. 1979. Foliar trichomes of Quercus in the Easter United States. J Arnold Arboretum 60: 350-366.
56. Zanetto A, Roussel G, Kremer A. 1994. Geographic variation of inter-specific differentiation between Quercus robur L. & Quercus petraea (Matt.) Liebl. Forest Genet 1: 111-123.