Quantitative small animal PET

Quarterly Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging

Volumn 53, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 365-373

  Shoghi, K I ^a  

^a WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Animals; Molecular imaging; Tomography, emission computed

Indexed keywords

ACETIC ACID C 11; CARBON 11; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE 6 PHOSPHATE F 18; FLUORODEOXYGLUCOSE F 18; GLUCOSE C 11; METFORMIN; PALMITIC ACID C 11; RADIOLIGAND; RADIOPHARMACEUTICAL AGENT; ROSIGLITAZONE; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

CONFERENCE PAPER; DRUG METABOLISM; GENE EXPRESSION; IMAGE ANALYSIS; ISOTOPE LABELING; MOLECULAR IMAGING; NON INSULIN DEPENDENT DIABETES MELLITUS; NONHUMAN; POSITRON EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS; VALIDATION STUDY;

ANIMALS; DRUG DESIGN; DRUG EVALUATION, PRECLINICAL; HUMANS; MODELS, BIOLOGICAL; POSITRON-EMISSION TOMOGRAPHY; RADIOPHARMACEUTICALS;

EID: 74949085524     PISSN: 18244785     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (39)

1. Boellaard R. Standards for PET image acquisition and quantitative data analysis. J Nucl Med 2009;50 Suppl 1:11S-20S.
2. Ito K, Kubota K, Morooka M, Shida Y, Hasuo K, Endo H et al. Diagnostic usefulness of (18)F-FDG PET/CT in the differentiation of pulmonary artery sarcoma and pulmonary embolism. Ann Nucl Med 2009. In press.
3. Lucignani G, Paganelli G, and Bombardieri E. The use of standardized uptake values for assessing FDG uptake with PET in oncology: a clinical perspective. Nucl Med Commun 2004;25:651-6.
4. Ning XH, Meng QL, Wang YZ, Bai CM. Application of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in diagnosis of malignant diseases. Chin Med Sci J 2009;24:117-21.
5. Suzuki K, Nishioka T, Homma A, Tsuchiya K, Yasuda M, Aoyama H et al. Value of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography before radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: does the standardized uptake value predict treatment outcome? Jpn J Radiol 2009;27:237-42.
6. Wahl RL, Jacene H, Kasamon Y, Lodge MA. From RECIST to PERCIST: Evolving Considerations for PET response criteria in solid tumors. J Nucl Med 2009;50 Suppl 1:122S-50S.
7. Kim SJ, Lee JS, Im KC, Kim SY, Park SA, Lee SJ et al. Kinetic modeling of 3′-deoxy-3′-18F-fluoromymidine for quantitative cell proliferation imaging in subcutaneous tumor models in mice. J Nucl Med 2008;49:2057-66.
8. Pollok KE, Lahn M, Enas N, McNulty A, Graff J, Cai S et al. In vivo measurements of tumor metabolism and growth after administration of enzastaurin using small animal FDG positron emission tomography. J Oncol 2O09;20O9:596560.
9. Shoghi KI, Finck BN, Schechtman KB, Sharp T, Herrero P, Gropler RJ et al. In vivo metabolic phenotyping of myocardial substrate metabolism in rodents: differential efficacy of metformin and rosiglitazone monotherapy. Circ Cardio Imaging 2009;2:373-81.
10. Shoghi KI, Gropler RJ, Sharp T, Herrero P, Fettig N, Su Y et al. Time course of alterations in myocardial glucose utilization in the zucker diabetic fatty rat with correlation to gene expression of glucose transporters: a small-animal PET investigation. J Nucl Med 2008;49:1320-7.
11. Guo Y, Gao F, Wang S, Ding Y, Zhang H, Wang J et al. In vivo mapping of temporospatial changes in glucose utilization in rat brain during epileptogenesis: an 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose-small animal positron emission tomography study. Neuroscience 2009;162:972-9.
12. Acton PD, Zhuang H, Alavi A. Quantification in PET. Radiol Clin North Am 2004;42:1055-62, viii.
13. Wienhard K. Measurement of glucose consumption using [18F] fluorodeoxyglucose. Methods 2002;27:218-25.
14. Fang YH, Muzic RF Jr. Spillover and Partial-Volume Correction for Image-Derived Input Functions for Small-Animal 18F-FDG PET Studies. J Nucl Med 2008;49:606-14.
15. Laforest R, Sharp TL, Engelbach JA, Fettig NM, Herrero P, Kim J et al. Measurement of input functions in rodents: challenges and solutions. Nucl Med Biol 2005;32:679-85.
16. Shoghi KI, Welch MJ. Hybrid image and blood sampling input function for quantification of small animal dynamic PET data. Nucl Med Biol 2007;34:989-94.
17. Su Y, Shoghi KI, Single-Input-Dual-Output Modeling of Image-Based Input Function Estimation. Mol Imaging Biol 2009. In press.
18. Su Y, Welch MJ, Shoghi KI. The application of maximum likelihood factor analysis (MLFA) with uniqueness constraints on dynamic cardiac microPET data. Phys Med Biol 2007;52:2313-34.
19. Ferl GZ, Zhang X, Wu HM, Huang SC. Estimation of the 18F-FDG input function in mice by use of dynamic small-animal PET and minimal blood sample data. J Nucl Med 2007;48:2037-45.
20. Fang YH, Muzic RF Jr. Spillover and partial-volume correction for image-derived input functions for small-animal 18F-FDG PET studies. J Nucl Med 2008;49:606-14.
21. Wu HM, Sui G, Lee CC, Prins ML, Ladno W, Lin HD, Yu AS et al. In vivo quantitation of glucose metabolism in mice using small-animal PET and a microfluidic device. J Nucl Med 2007;48:837-45.
22. Cheng KT, Menkens A, Bryant S, Sullivan DC. NIH MICAD initiative and guest author program opportunities. J Nucl Med 2007;48:19N.
23. Southworth R, Parry CR, Parkes HG, Medina RA, Garlick PB. Tissue-specific differences in 2-fluoro-2-deoxyglucose metabolism beyond FDG-6-P: a 19F NMR spectroscopy study in the rat. NMR Biomed 2003;16:494-502.
24. Wienhard K. Measurement of glucose consumption using [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose. Methods 2002;27:218-25.
25. Patlak CS, Blasberg RG, Fenstermacher JD. Graphical evaluation of blood-to-brain transfer constants from multiple-time uptake data. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1983;3:1-7.
26. Logan J, Fowler JS, Volkow ND, Wolf AP, Dewey SL, Schlyer DJ et al. Graphical analysis of reversible radioligand binding from time-activity measurements applied to [N-11C-methyl]-(-)-cocaine PET studies in human subjects. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1990;10:740-7.
27. Slifstein M, Laruelle M. Models and methods for derivation of in vivo neuroreceptor parameters with PET and SPECT reversible radiotracers. Nucl Med Biol 2001;28:595-608.
28. Lehnert W, Meikle SR, Siegel S, Newport D, Banati RB, Rosenfeld AB. Evaluation of transmission methodology and attenuation correction for the microPET Focus 220 animal scanner. Phys Med Biol 2006;51:4003-16.
29. Soret M, Bacharach SL, Buvat I. Partial-volume effect in PET tumor imaging. J Nucl Med 2007;48:932-45.
30. Lopaschuk GD, Belke DD, Gamble J, Itoi T, Schonekess BO. Regulation of fatty acid oxidation in the mammalian heart in health and disease. Biochim Biophys Acta 1994;1213:263-76.
31. Lopaschuk GD. Metabolic abnormalities in the diabetic heart. Heart Fail Rev 2002;7:149-59.
32. Wallenstein S, Zucker CL, and Fleiss JL. Some statistical methods useful in circulation research. Circ Res 1980;47:1-9.
33. Henriksson E, Kjellen E, Wahlberg P, Ohlsson T, Wennerberg J, Brun E. 2-Deoxy-2-[18F] fluoro-D-glucose uptake and correlation to intratumoral heterogeneity. Anticancer Res 2007;27(4B):2155-9.
34. Wyss MT, Honer M, Schubiger PA, Ametamey SM. NanoPET imaging of [(18)F]fluoromisonidazole uptake in experimental mouse tumours. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2006;33:311-8.
35. Zhao S, Kuge Y, Mochizuki T, Takahashi T, Nakada K, Sato M et al. Biologic correlates of intratumoral heterogeneity in 18F-FDG distribution with regional expression of glucose transporters and hexokinase-II in experimental tumor. J Nucl Med 2005;46:675-82.
36. Herholz K, Patlak CS. The influence of tissue heterogeneity on results of fitting nonlinear model equations to regional tracer uptake curves: with an application to compartmental models used in positron emission tomography. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1987;7:214-29.
37. Wu HM, Huang SC, Choi Y, Hoh CK, Hawkins RA. A modeling method to improve quantitation of fluorodeoxyglucose uptake in heterogeneous tumor tissue. J Nucl Med 1995;36:297-306.
38. Schmidt K, Lucignani G, Moresco RM, Rizzo G, Gilardi MC, Messa C et al. Errors introduced by tissue heterogeneity in estimation of local cerebral glucose utilization with current kinetic models of the [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose method. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab 1992;12:823-34.
39. Su Y, Shoghi KI. Wavelet denoising in voxel-based parametric estimation of small animal PET images: a systematic evaluation of spatial constraints and noise reduction algorithms. Phys Med Biol 2008;53:5899-915.