An "all 5-mm ports" versus conventional ports approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy and nissen fundoplication: A randomized clinical trial

Surgical Laparoscopy, Endoscopy and Percutaneous Techniques

Volumn 19, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 442-448

  Abbas, Muhammad Hasan ^a   Hamade, Ayman ^b   Nadeem, Rana ^c   Ammori, Basil ^d  

^a QUEEN S HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^b QEQM Hospital   (United Kingdom)

^c HOPE HOSPITAL   (United Kingdom)

^d UNIVERSITY OF MANCHESTER   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

All 5 mm ports; Cholecystectomy; Fundoplication

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY; CLINICAL TRIAL; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HUMAN; LAPAROSCOPIC SURGERY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; PAIN ASSESSMENT; PATIENT SATISFACTION; POSTOPERATIVE PAIN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; SCAR; STOMACH FUNDOPLICATION; SURGICAL INSTRUMENT;

ADULT; BODY IMAGE; CHOLECYSTECTOMY, LAPAROSCOPIC; CHOLELITHIASIS; FEMALE; FUNDOPLICATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; PNEUMOPERITONEUM, ARTIFICIAL; QUESTIONNAIRES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 74949083163     PISSN: 15304515     EISSN: 15344908     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/SLE.0b013e3181bd9435     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Schwenk W, Neudecker J, Mall J, et al. Prospective randomized blinded trial of pulmonary function, pain, and cosmetic results after laparoscopic versus microlaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:345-348.
2. Cheah WK, Lenzi JE, So JB, et al. Randomized trial of needlescopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 2001; 88:45-47.
3. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, et al. Microlaparoscopic vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind trial. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:458-464.
4. Ainslie WG, Catton JA, Davides D, et al. Micropuncture cholecystectomy vs conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2003;17:766-772.
5. Golder M, Rhodes M. Prospective randomized trial of 5-and 10-mm epigastric ports in laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Br J Surg. 1998;85:1066-1067.
6. El-Dhuwaib Y, Hamade AM, Issa ME, et al. An "all 5-mm ports" selective approach to laparoscopic cholecystectomy, appendectomy, and anti-reflux surgery. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2004;14:141-144.
7. Hamade AM, Butt I, Balbisi B, et al. Closed blunt-trocar 5mmport for primary cannulation in laparoscopic surgery: a safe technique. Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech. 2006;16:156-160.
8. Melzack R. The short form McGill pain questionnaire. Pain. 1987;30:191-197.
9. Clark WC, Yang JC, Tsui SL, et al. Unidimensional pain rating scales: a multidimensional affect and pain survey (MAPS) analysis of what they really measure. Pain. 2002;98:241-247.
10. Gagliese L, Weizblit N, Ellis W, et al. The measurement of postoperative pain: a comparison of intensity scales in younger and older surgical patients. Pain. 2005;117:412-420.
11. DunkerMS, Stiggelbout AM, van Hogezand RA, et al. Cosmesis and body image after laproscopic-assissted and open ileocolic resection for Crohn's disease. Surg Endosc. 1998;12:1334-1340.
12. Franklin ME Jr, Jaramillo EJ, Glass JL, et al. Needlescopic cholecystectomy: lessons learned in 10 years of experience. JSLS. 2006;10:43-46.
13. Look M, Chew SP, Tan YC, et al. Post-operative pain in needlescopic versus conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a prospective randomised trial. J R Coll Surg Edinb. 2001;46: 138-142.
14. Alponat A, Cubukcu A, Gonullu N, et al. Is minisite cholecystectomy less traumatic? prospective randomized study comparing minisite and conventional laparoscopic cholecystectomies. World J Surg. 2002;26:1437-1440.
15. Huang MT, Wang W, Wei PL, et al. Minilaparoscopic and laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a comparative study. Arch Surg. 2003;138:1017-1023.
16. Leggett PL, Bissell CD, Churchman-Winn R. Cosmetic minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2001;15:1229-1231.
17. Pace DE, Chiasson PM, Schlachta CM, et al. Needlescopic fundoplication. Surg Endosc. 2002;16:578-580.
18. Davides D, Vesakis A, Lianyu Y, et al. Early experiences with micro puncture laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1997;11:513.
19. Berci G. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy using fine-caliber instruments. Smaller is not necessarily better. Surg Endosc. 1998; 12:197.
20. Slim K, Pezet D, Stencl J Jr, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: an original three-trocar technique. World J Surg. 1995;19: 394-397.
21. Leung KF, Lee KW, Cheung TY, et al. Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: two-port technique. Endoscopy. 1996;28:505-507.
22. Davides D, Dexter SP, Vezakis A, et al. Micropuncture laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 1999;13:2368.
23. Leggett PL, Churchman-Winn R, Miller G. Minimizing ports to improve laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2000; 14:32-36.
24. Unger SW, Paramo JC, Perez M. Microlaproscopic cholecystectomy. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:336-339.
25. Gupta A, Shrivastava UK, Kumar P, et al. Microlaparoscopic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized controlled trial. Trop Gastroenterol. 2005;26:149-151.
26. Bisgaard T, Klarskov B, Trap R, et al. Pain after microlaproscopic cholecystectomy: a randomized double-blind controlled study. Surg Endosc. 2000;14:340-344.