The centrality of user modeling to high recall with high precision search

Conference Proceedings - IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 91-96

  Brassil, Dan ^a   Hogan, Christopher ^a   Attfield, Simon ^b  

^a H5   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Accuracy; Complex litigation; Human computer interaction; Information retrieval, sensemaking

Indexed keywords

COMMON GROUND; EXTERNAL KNOWLEDGE; HIGH-PRECISION SEARCHES; HUMAN-COMPUTER SYSTEMS; INFORMATION NEED; INTERNAL AGENTS; MAIN COMPONENT; MOVING TARGETS; MUTUAL KNOWLEDGE; SCIENTIFIC RESEARCHES; SEARCH TASKS; SENSEMAKING; USER MODELING;

COMPLEXATION; CYBERNETICS; INDUSTRIAL RESEARCH; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INFORMATION SERVICES; KNOWLEDGE MANAGEMENT; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION; TOBACCO;

HUMAN COMPUTER INTERACTION;

EID: 74849130750     PISSN: 1062922X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICSMC.2009.5346738     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (28)

1. T. Saracevic. Relevance: A review of the literature and a framework for thinking on the notion in information science. Part II: Nature and Manifestations of Relevance. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 58(3):1915-1933. 2007
2. J. H. Lee, A. Renear, L. Smith. Known-Item Search: Variations on a Concept. Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 43(1). 2007.
3. N. Belkin. Anomalous States of Knowledge as a Basis for Information Retrieval. Canadian Journal of Information Science, 5:133-143. 1980.
4. C.C. Kuhlthau. A principle of uncertainty for information seeking. Journal of Documentation, 49(4):39-55. 1993.
5. P. Vakkari. A theory of the task-based information retrieval process: a summary and generalisation of a longitudinal study. Journal of Documentation, 57(1):44-60. 2001.
6. K. Byström, K. Järvelin. Task complexity affects information seeking and use. Information Processing and Management, 31(2):191-213. 1995.
7. P. Ingwersen and K. Järvelin. The Turn: Integration of Information Seeking and Retrieval in Context. Springer. 2005.
8. S.C. Yang. Information seeking as problem-solving using a qualitative approach to uncover the novice learner's information-seeking processes in a Perseus hypertext system. Library and Information Science Research, 19(1):71-92. 1997.
9. R. Tang, P. Solomon. Toward an understanding of the dynamics of relevance judgment: An analysis of one person's search behaviour. Information Processing and Management, 34(2-3):237-256. 1998
10. D. M. Russell, M. J. Stefik, P. L. Pirolli, S. K. Card. The Cost Structure of Sensemaking. Proceedings of InterCHI, ACM, pp. 269-276. 1993.
11. nd International Workshop on Supporting Search and Sensemaking for Electronically Stored Information in Discovery Proceedings. 2008. Available online at: http://www.cs.ucl.ac.uk/staff/S.Attfield/desi/5.%20Bauer.pdf
12. S. Attfield, A. Blandford. Improving the cost structure of sensemaking tasks: Analyzing user concepts to inform information system design. To appear in Proceedings of INTERACT 2009.
13. J.B. Thomas, S.M. Clark, D.A. Gioia. Strategic sensemaking and organisational performance: linkages among scanning, interpretation, action and outcomes. Academy of Management Journal, 36: 239-270. 1993.
14. T. Saracevic,, A. Spink, and M.-M. Wu. Users and Intermediaries in Information Retrieval: What are they talking about? In User Modeling. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference, UM97: pp. 43-54. 1997.
15. M. K. Buckland, and C. Plaunt. On the construction of selection systems. Library Hi Tech, 12(4):15-28. 1994.
16. J. S. Brown. A Symbiotic Theory Formation System. PhD thesis, University of Michigan. 1972.
17. J. Roschelle and S. Teasley. The construction of shared knowledge in collaborative problem solving. In C. O'Malley, ed., Computer-supported collaborative learning, pp. 69-77. Springer-Verlag, Heidelberg, Germany. 1995.
18. G. Klein, J.K. Phillips, E.L. Rall, D.A. Peluso. A Data-frame Theory of Sensemaking. In: Expertise Out of Context: Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Naturalistic Decision Making 2003. US: Lawrence Erlbaum Assoc. Inc, 2007, pp.113-155.
19. K. Weick. Sensemaking in organisations. London, England: Sage Publications, Inc. 1995.
20. Pirolli P. and Card S., The sensemaking process and leverage points for analyst technology as identified through cognitive task analysis. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, McLean, VA. 2005.
21. N. Belkin, H., R. Oddy, H. Brooks. ASK for information retrieval: Part I. background and theory. Journal of Documentation, 38(2):66-71. 1982.
22. N. Belkin. Interaction with texts: Information retrieval as information-seeking behavior. In Information Retrieval '93: Von der Modellierung zur Anwendung, pp. 55-66. Konstanz. 1993.
23. A. Broder. A Taxonomy of web search. ACM SIGIR Forum, v.36 n.2, Fall 2002.
24. H. Uejima, T. Miura, I. Shioya. Improving text categorization by resolving semantic ambiguity. Systems and Computers in Japan 36(4):1-8. 2005.
25. F. W. Kroon. Linguistic Variation in Information Retrieval Using Query Reformulation. M.S. thesis. Simon Fraser University. 2002.
26. J. Baron, B. Hedin, D. Oard, S. Tomlinson. TREC-2008 Legal Track Interactive Task - Guidelines. 2008. Available online at: http://treclegal. umiacs.umd.edu/2008InteractiveGuidelines.pdf
27. D. Oard, B. Hedin, S. Tomlinson, J. Baron. Overview of the TREC 2008 Legal Track. In The Seventeenth Text REtrieval Conference (TREC 2008) Proceedings. 2009.
28. S. Attfield, A. Blandford, S. De Gabrielle Investigations within investigations: a recursive framework for scalable sensemaking support. Sensemaking workshop (CHI 2008) Available online at: http://www.uclic. ucl.ac.uk/people/s.attfield/saabsdgInvestigationsWithinInvestigations.pdf