Causal learning about tolerance and sensitization

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 1043-1049

  Rottman, Benjamin Margolin ^a   Ahn, Woo Kyoung ^a  

^a YALE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; DECISION MAKING; HUMAN; LEARNING; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

ASSOCIATION LEARNING; ATTENTION; COMPREHENSION; GENERALIZATION (PSYCHOLOGY); HUMANS; JUDGMENT; PATTERN RECOGNITION, VISUAL;

EID: 74849118307     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.6.1043     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Barsalou, L. W., Huttenlocher, J., & Lamberts, K. (1998). Basing categorization on individuals and events. Cognitive Psychology, 36, 203-272. doi:10.1006/cogp.1998.0687
2. Cheng, P. W. (1997). From covariation to causation: A causal power theory. Psychological Review, 104, 367-405. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.104.2.367
3. Cheng, P. W., & Novick, L. R. (1992). Covariation in natural causal induction. Psychological Review, 99, 365-382. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.99.2.365
4. Dennis, M. J., & Ahn, W. (2001). Primacy in causal strength judgments: The effect of initial evidence for generative versus inhibitory relationships. Memory & Cognition, 29, 152-164.
5. Dickinson, A., Shanks, D., & Evenden, J. (1984). Judgment of actoutcome contingency: The role of selective attribution. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 36A, 29-50.
6. Goudie, A. J., & Emmett-Oglesby, M. W. (eds.) (1989). Psychoactive drugs: Tolerance and sensitization. Clifton, NJ: Humana Press.
7. Griffiths, T. L., & Tenenbaum, J. B. (2005). Structure and strength in causal induction. Cognitive Psychology, 51, 334-384. doi:10.1016/j.cogpsych.2005.05.004
8. Jenkins, H. M., & Ward, W. C. (1965). Judgment of contingency between responses and outcomes. Psychological Monographs: General & Applied, 79(Whole No. 594).
9. Kelley, H. H. (1972). Causal schemata and the attribution process. In E. E. Jones, D. E. Kanounse, H. H. Kelley, R. E. Nissbett, S. Valins, & B. Weiner (Eds.), Attribution: Perceiving the causes of behavior (pp. 151-174). Morristown, NJ: General Learning Press.
10. Luhmann, C. C., & Ahn, W. (2005). The meaning and computation of causal power: Comment on Cheng (1997) and Novick and Cheng (2004). Psychological Review, 112, 685-693. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.112.3.685
11. Peeke, H. V. S., & Petrinovich, L. (eds.) (1984). Habituation, sensitization, and behavior. Orlando, FL: Academic Press.
12. Rescorla, R. A., & Wagner, A. R. (1972). A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: Variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In A. H. Black & W. F. Prokasy (Eds.), Classical conditioning II: Current research and theory (pp. 64-99). New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts.
13. Rottman, B. M., Ahn, W., & Luhmann, C. C. (in press). When and how do people reason about unobserved causes? In P. Illari, F. Russo, & J. Williamson (Eds.), Causality in the sciences. New York: Oxford University Press.
14. Spellman, B. A. (1996). Acting as intuitive scientists: Contingency judgments are made while controlling for alternative potential causes. Psychological Science, 7, 337-342. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.1996.tb00385.x
15. Wagner, A. R. (1981). SOP: A model of automatic memory processing in animal behavior. In N. E. Spear & R. R. Miller (Eds.), Information processing in animals: Memory mechanisms (pp. 5-47). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
16. Waldmann, M. R. (1996). Knowledge-based causal induction. In D. R. Shanks, K. J. Holyoak, & D. L. Medin (Eds.), The psychology of learning and motivation: Vol. 34. Causal learning (pp. 47-88). San Diego: Academic Press.
17. Waldmann, M. R., & Hagmayer, Y. (2001). Estimating causal strength: The role of structural knowledge and processing effort. Cognition, 82, 27-58. doi:10.1016/S0010-0277(01)00141-X