Application of response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design in optimizing the preparation conditions of vinyltriethoxysilane modified silicalite/polydimethylsiloxane hybrid pervaporation membranes

Separation and Purification Technology

Volumn 71, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 252-262

  Yi, Shouliang ^a,b   Su, Yi ^a   Qi, Benkun ^a,b   Su, Zhiguo ^a   Wan, Yinhua ^a  

^a INSTITUTE OF PROCESS ENGINEERING   (China)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES   (China)

Author keywords

Central composite rotatable design; Pervaporation; Polydimethylsiloxane; Response surface methodology; Silicalite

Indexed keywords

CENTRAL COMPOSITE ROTATABLE DESIGN; HYBRID MEMBRANE; MAIN EFFECT; MAXIMUM SELECTIVITY; MODEL SOLUTION; PERVAPORATION MEMBRANES; POLYMER CONCENTRATIONS; PREPARATION CONDITIONS; QUADRATIC EFFECT; REGRESSION EQUATION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; SIGNIFICANT FACTORS; SILICALITE; TOTAL FLUX; VINYLTRIETHOXYSILANE; WEIGHT RATIOS;

COMPOSITE MEMBRANES; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); DESIGN; ETHANOL; EVAPORATION; OPTIMIZATION; PERVAPORATION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SILICONES; SURFACE PROPERTIES;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE (ANOVA);

EID: 74849112032     PISSN: 13835866     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.seppur.2009.12.005     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Schügerl K. Integrated processing of biotechnology products. Biotechnol. Adv. 18 (2000) 581-599
2. O'Brien D.J., Roth L.H., and McAloon A.J. Ethanol production by continuous fermentation-pervaporation: a preliminary economic analysis. J. Membr. Sci. 166 (2000) 105-111
3. Mohammadi T., Aroujalian A., and Bakhshi A. Pervaporation of dilute alcoholic mixtures using PDMS membrane. Chem. Eng. Sci. 60 (2005) 1875-1880
4. Li L., Xiao Z., Tan S., Pu L., and Zhang Z. Composite PDMS membrane with high flux for the separation of organics from water by pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 243 (2004) 177-187
5. Kim H.J., Nah S.S., and Min B.R. A new technique for preparation of PDMS pervaporation membrane for VOC removal. Adv. Environ. Res. 6 (2002) 255-264
6. Fadeev A.G., Kelley S.S., McMillan J.D., Selinskaya Y.A., Khotimsky V.S., and Volkov V.V. Effect of yeast fermentation by-products on poly[1-(trimethylsilyl)-1-propyne] pervaporative performance. J. Membr. Sci. 214 (2003) 229-238
7. Gonzalez-Velasco J.R., Gonzalez-Marcos J.A., and Lopez-Dehesa C. Pervaporation of ethanol-water mixtures through poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne) (PTMSP) membranes. Desalination 149 (2002) 61-65
8. Fadeev A.G., Selinskaya Y.A., Kelley S.S., Meagher M.M., Litvinova E.G., Khotimsky V.S., and Volkov V.V. Extraction of butanol from aqueous solutions by pervaporation through poly(1-trimethylsilyl-1-propyne). J. Membr. Sci. 186 (2001) 205-217
9. Ikegami T., Yanagishita H., Kitamoto D., Haraya K., Nakane T., Matsuda H., Koura N., and Sano T. Production of highly concentrated ethanol in a coupled fermentation/pervaporation process using silicalite membranes. Biotechnol. Tech. 11 (1997) 921-924
10. Sano T., Yanagishita H., Kiyozumi Y., Mizukami F., and Haraya K. Separation of ethanol/water mixture by silicalite membrane on pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 95 (1994) 221-228
11. Bowen T.C., Meier R.G., and Vane L.M. Stability of MFI zeolite-filled PDMS membranes during pervaporative ethanol recovery from aqueous mixtures containing acetic acid. J. Membr. Sci. 298 (2007) 117-125
12. Dotremont C., Vankelecom I.F.J., Morobe M., Uytterhoeven J.B., and Vandecasteele C. Zeolite-filled PDMS membranes. 2. Pervaporation of halogenated hydrocarbons. J. Phys. Chem. B 101 (1997) 2160-2163
13. Vankelecom I.F.J., Scheppers E., Heus R., and Uytterhoeven J.B. Parameters influencing zeolite incorporation in PDMS membranes. J. Phys. Chem. 98 (1994) 12390-12396
14. Jia M.-D., Pleinemann K.-V., and Behling R.-D. Preparation and characterization of thin-film zeolite-PDMS composite membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 73 (1992) 119-128
15. Ulutan S., and Nakagawa T. Separability of ethanol and water mixtures through PTMSP-silica membranes in pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 143 (1998) 275-284
16. Ikegami T., Kitamoto D., Negishi H., Haraya K., Matsuda H., Nitanai Y., Koura N., Sano T., and Yanagishita H. Drastic improvement of bioethanol recovery using a pervaporation separation technique employing a silicone rubber-coated silicalite membrane. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 78 (2003) 1006-1010
17. Katsuki H., Kamochi N., Sugiyama S., and Muronaga T. Hydrothermal synthesis and characteristics of porous mullite honeycomb coated with silicalite film. J. Ceram. Soc. Jpn. 109 (2001) 882-885
18. Huang H.-J., Ramaswamy S., Tschirner U.W., and Ramarao B.V. A review of separation technologies in current and future biorefineries. Sep. Purif. Technol. 62 (2008) 1-21
19. Vane L.M. A review of pervaporation for product recovery from biomass fermentation processes. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 80 (2005) 603-629
20. Lu S.Y., Huang H.Y., and Wu K.H. Silicalite/poly(dimethylsiloxane) nanocomposite pervaporation membranes for acetic acid/water separation. J. Mater. Res. 16 (2001) 3053-3059
21. Y. Su, S.L. Yi, H.L. Zhou, Y.H. Wan, Preparation methods of organic-inorganic hybrid alcoholic permselective pervaporation membranes, China Patent CN200810101212.3 (2008).
22. Li Y., Jiang H., Xu Y., and Zhang X. Optimization of nutrient components for enhanced phenazine-1-carboxylic acid production by gacA-inactivated Pseudomonas sp. M18G using response surface method. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 77 (2008) 1207-1217
23. Sayyad S., Panda B., Javed S., and Ali M. Optimization of nutrient parameters for lovastatin production by Monascus purpureus MTCC 369 under submerged fermentation using response surface methodology. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 73 (2007) 1054-1058
24. Aslan N. Application of response surface methodology and central composite rotatable design for modeling the influence of some operating variables of a multi-gravity separator for coal cleaning. Fuel 86 (2007) 769-776
25. Xiangli F., Wei W., Chen Y., Jin W., and Xu N. Optimization of preparation conditions for polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS)/ceramic composite pervaporation membranes using response surface methodology. J. Membr. Sci. 311 (2008) 23-33
26. Rossi C., Briand E., Parot P., Odorico M., and Chopineau J. Surface response methodology for the study of supported membrane formation. J. Phys. Chem. B 111 (2007) 7567-7576
27. Ismail A.F., and Lai P.Y. Development of defect-free asymmetric polysulfone membranes for gas separation using response surface methodology. Sep. Purif. Technol. 40 (2004) 191-207
28. Box G.E.P., and Wilson K.B. On the experimental attainment of optimal conditions. J. Roy. Statist. Soc. B 13 (1951) 1-45
29. Panesar P.S. Application of response surface methodology in the permeabilization of yeast cells for lactose hydrolysis. Biochem. Eng. J. 39 (2008) 91-96
30. Gunaraj V., and Murugan N. Application of response surface methodology for predicting weld bead quality in submerged arc welding of pipes. J. Mater. Process. Technol. 88 (1999) 266-275
31. Montgomery D.C. Design and Analysis of Experiments. 6th ed. (2006), John Wiley & Sons, New York, USA
32. Idris A., Kormin F., and Noordin M.Y. Application of response surface methodology in describing the performance of thin film composite membrane. Sep. Purif. Technol. 49 (2006) 271-280
33. te Hennepe H.J.C., Bargeman D., Mulder M.H.V., and Smolders C.A. Zeolite-filled silicone rubber membranes. Part 1. Membrane preparation and pervaporation results. J. Membr. Sci. 35 (1987) 39-55
34. Vane L.M., Namboodiri V.V., and Bowen T.C. Hydrophobic zeolite-silicone rubber mixed matrix membranes for ethanol-water separation: effect of zeolite and silicone component selection on pervaporation performance. J. Membr. Sci. 308 (2008) 230-241