Prevalence of human anti-mouse antibodies (HAMAs) in routine examinations

Clinica Chimica Acta

Volumn 411, Issue 5-6, 2010, Pages 391-394

  Koshida, Saori ^a   Asanuma, Koichi ^a   Kuribayashi, Kageaki ^a,b   Goto, Maki ^a   Tsuji, Naoki ^b   Kobayashi, Daisuke ^a,b   Tanaka, Maki ^a,b   Watanabe, Naoki ^a,b  

^a SAPPORO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Japan)

^b SAPPORO MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

Author keywords

ELISA; HAMA; Heterophilic antibody; Immunoassay; Interference

Indexed keywords

HETEROPHILE ANTIBODY; HORSERADISH PEROXIDASE; HUMAN MOUSE ANTIBODY; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G ANTIBODY; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G1; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G2A; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G2B; IMMUNOGLOBULIN M ANTIBODY; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ANTIBODY BLOOD LEVEL; ANTIBODY DETECTION; ANTIBODY TITER; ANTIGEN ANTIBODY COMPLEX; ARTICLE; BLOOD SAMPLING; CHILD; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FEMALE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MEDICAL EXAMINATION; OBSERVATIONAL STUDY; OUTPATIENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SEROPREVALENCE; WESTERN BLOTTING;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; ANTIBODIES, HETEROPHILE; ANTIGEN-ANTIBODY REACTIONS; BLOOD CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; CHILD; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOGLOBULIN G; IMMUNOGLOBULIN M; JAPAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; YOUNG ADULT;

ARMORACIA RUSTICANA;

EID: 74849108786     PISSN: 00098981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.cca.2009.12.006     Document Type: Article

References (12)

1. Hedenborg G., Pettersson T., and Carlstrom A. Heterophilic antibodies causing falsely raised thyroid-stimulating-hormone result. Lancet 2 (1979) 755
2. Hunter W.M., and Budd P.S. Circulating antibodies to ovine and bovine immunoglobulin in healthy subjects: a hazard for immunoassays. Lancet 2 (1980) 1136
3. Klee G.G. Human anti-mouse antibodies. Arch Pathol Lab Med 124 (2000) 921-923
4. Thompson R.J., Jackson A.P., and Langlois N. Circulating antibodies to mouse monoclonal immunoglobulins in normal subjects-incidence, species specificity, and effects on a two-site assay for creatine kinase-MB isoenzyme. Clin Chem 32 (1986) 476-481
5. Koshida S., Tsuji N., Endoh T., Yamada K., and Watanabe N. Fundamental study of the reagent for measurement of elastase1 using latex agglutination method; analysis of the mechanisms by which HAMA caused the deviation from the value obtained by RIA in the 2 samples. Jpn J Clin Lab Automat 29 3 (2004) 211-216 Japanese
6. Kricka L.J. Human anti-animal antibody interferences in immunological assays. Clin Chem 45 (1999) 942-956
7. Thorpe S.J., Turner C., Heath A., et al. Clonal analysis of a human antimouse antibody (HAMA) response. Scand J Immunol 57 (2003) 85-92
8. Dillman R.O., Shawler D.L., McCallister T.J., and Halpern S.E. Human anti-mouse antibody response in cancer patients following single low-dose injections of radiolabeled murine monoclonal antibodies. Cancer Biother 9 (1994) 17-28
9. Gruber R., van Haarlem L.J., Warnaar S.O., Holz E., and Riethmuller G. The human antimouse immunoglobulin response and the anti-idiotypic network have no influence on clinical outcome in patients with minimal residual colorectal cancer treated with monoclonal antibody CO17-1A. Cancer Res 60 (2000) 1921-1926
10. Schroff R.W., Foon K.A., Beatty S.M., Oldham R.K., and Morgan Jr. A.C. Human anti-murine immunoglobulin responses in patients receiving monoclonal antibody therapy. Cancer Res 45 (1985) 879-885
11. Survey of methods for measuring human anti-mouse antibodies. HAMA Survey Group. Clin Chim Acta 215 (1993) 153-163
12. Dalmau J.O., and Posner J.B. Paraneoplastic syndromes. Arch Neurol 56 (1999) 405-408