Does the truth interfere with our ability to deceive?

Psychonomic Bulletin and Review

Volumn 16, Issue 5, 2009, Pages 901-906

  Osman, Magda ^a,b   Channon, Shelley ^b   Fitzpatrick, Sian ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SURREY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; REACTION TIME; RECUMBENCY; STROOP TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE;

DECEPTION; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; REACTION TIME; STROOP TEST; TASK PERFORMANCE AND ANALYSIS; YOUNG ADULT;

EID: 74849105637     PISSN: 10699384     EISSN: 15315320     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3758/PBR.16.5.901     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Bond, C. F., & DePaulo, B. (2006). Accuracy of deceptive judgments. Personality & Social Psychology Review, 10, 214-234.
2. Dahlin, E., Neely, A. S., Larsson, A., Bäckman, L., & Nyberg, L. (2008). Transfer of learning after updating training mediated by the striatum. Science, 320, 1510-1512.
3. DePaulo, B. M., Lindsay, J. J., Malone, B. E., Muhlenbruck, L., Charlton, K., & Cooper, H. (2003). Cues to deception. Psychological Bulletin, 129, 74-118.
4. Egner, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Cognitive control mechanisms resolve conflict through cortical amplification of task-relevant information. Nature Neuroscience, 8, 1784-1790.
5. Gorfein, D. S., & MacLeod, C. M. (2007). Inhibition in cognition. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
6. Johnson, M. K., & Raye, C. L. (1981). Reality monitoring. Psychological Review, 88, 67-85.
7. Jokinen, A., Santtila, P., Ravaja, N., & Puttonen, S. (2006). Salience of guilty knowledge test items affects accuracy in realistic mock crimes. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 62, 175-184.
8. Langleben, D. D., Loughead, J. W., Bilker, W. B., Ruparel, K., Childress, A. R., Busch, S. I., & Gur, R. (2005). Telling truth from lie in individual subjects with fast event-related fMRI. Human Brain Mapping, 26, 262-272.
9. Mayr, U., & Kliegl, R. (2000). Task-set switching and long-term memory retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, & Cognition, 26, 1124-1140.
10. Nunez, J. M., Casey, B. J., Egner, T., Hare, T., & Hirsch, J. (2005). Intentional false responding shares neural substrates with response conflict and cognitive control. NeuroImage, 25, 267-277.
11. Rogers, R. D., & Monsell, S. (1995). Costs of a predictable switch between simple cognitive tasks. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 124, 207-231.
12. Spence, S. A., Hunter, M. A., Farrow, F. D., Green, R. D., Leung, D. H., Hughes, C. J., &Ganesan, V. (2004). A cognitive neurobiological account of deception: Evidence from functional neuroimaging. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B, 359, 1755-1762.
13. Sporer, S. L. (2004). Reality monitoring and the detection of deception. In P.-A. Granhag & L. A. Strömwall (Eds.), The detection of deception in forensic contexts (pp. 64-102). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
14. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643-662.
15. Vendemia, J. M., Buzan, R. F., & Green, E. P. (2005). Practice effects, workload, and reaction time in deception. American Journal of Psychology, 118, 413-429.
16. Walczyk, J. J., Roper, K. S., Seemann, E., & Humphrey, A. M. (2003). Cognitive mechanisms underlying lying to questions: Response time as a cue to deception. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 17, 755-774.
17. Walczyk, J. J., Schwartz, J. P., Clifton, R., Adams, B., Wei, M., & Zha, P. (2005). Lying person-to-person about life events: A cognitive framework for lie detection. Personnel Psychology, 58, 141-170.