Are mammography recommendations in women younger than 40 related to increased risk?

Breast Cancer Research and Treatment

Volumn 119, Issue 2, 2010, Pages 485-490

  Kapp, Julie M ^a   Yankaskas, Bonnie C ^b   Lefevre, Michael L ^a  

^a University of Missouri   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Breast neoplasms; Mammography; Mass screening; Practice guidelines; Risk factors

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; BREAST EXAMINATION; CANCER RISK; CLINICAL EXAMINATION; EVIDENCE BASED PRACTICE; FEMALE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; MAMMOGRAPHY; PRACTICE GUIDELINE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PUBLIC HEALTH; SELF REPORT; UNITED STATES;

ADULT; AGE FACTORS; BREAST NEOPLASMS; CROSS-SECTIONAL STUDIES; EVIDENCE-BASED MEDICINE; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MASS SCREENING; ODDS RATIO; PATIENT SELECTION; PHYSICIAN'S PRACTICE PATTERNS; PRACTICE GUIDELINES AS TOPIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; RISK ASSESSMENT; RISK FACTORS; UNITED STATES; UNNECESSARY PROCEDURES;

EID: 74849101328     PISSN: 01676806     EISSN: 15737217     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10549-008-0305-x     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. SC Lemon JG Zapka L Clemow, et al. 2006 Mammography screening after breast cancer diagnosis in a first degree female relative: age group differences (United States) Cancer Causes Control 17 1053 1065 10.1007/s10552-006-0039-1 10.1007/s10552-006-0039-1 16933056 (Pubitemid 44290770)
2. JM Kapp AB Ryerson SS Coughlin, et al. 2008 Racial and ethnic differences in mammography use among U.S. women younger than age 40 Breast Cancer Res Treat 10.1007/s10549-008-9919-2 18264758
3. JA Colbert EM Kaine J Bigby, et al. 2004 The age at which women begin mammographic screening Cancer 101 1850 1859 10.1002/cncr.20583 10.1002/cncr.20583 15386333 (Pubitemid 39314749)
4. GD Dodd 1992 American cancer society guidelines on screening for breast cancer. An overview Cancer 69 1885 1887 10.1002/1097-0142(19920401)69: 7+<1885::AID-CNCR2820691702>3.0.CO;2-B 10.1002/1097-0142(19920401)69: 7+<1885::AID-CNCR2820691702>3.0.CO;2-B 1:STN:280:DyaK387otlSnsw%3D%3D 1544086
5. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (2008) Medicare and You 2008. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. http://www.medicare.gov/ Publications/Pubs/pdf/10050.pdf. Cited 7 July 2008
6. American Cancer Society (2007) Cancer facts & figures, 2007. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GA
7. American Cancer Society (2008) Cancer facts & figures, 2008. American Cancer Society, Inc., Atlanta, GA
8. W Burke M Daly J Garber, et al. 1997 Recommendations for follow-up care of individuals with an inherited predisposition to cancer. II. BRCA1 and BRCA2. Cancer Genetics Studies Consortium JAMA 277 997 1003 10.1001/jama.277.12.997 10.1001/jama.277.12.997 1:STN:280:DyaK2s3ivVSguw%3D%3D 9091675 (Pubitemid 27142370)
9. M Robson K Offit 2007 Clinical practice. Management of an inherited predisposition to breast cancer N Engl J Med 357 154 162 10.1056/NEJMcp071286 10.1056/NEJMcp071286 1:CAS:528:DC%2BD2sXnslSjsbk%3D 17625127 (Pubitemid 47057733)
10. U.S. Preventive Services Task Force 2002 Screening for breast cancer: recommendations and rationale Ann Intern Med 137 344 346
11. HI Meissner N Breen ML Taubman, et al. 2007 Which women aren't getting mammograms and why? (United States) Cancer Causes Control 18 61 70 10.1007/s10552-006-0078-7 10.1007/s10552-006-0078-7 17186422 (Pubitemid 46020902)
12. National Center for Health Statistics (2006) Data file documentation, National Health Interview Survey, 2005 (machine readable data file and documentation). U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Hyattsville, MD
13. National Center for Health Statistics (2007) 2005 Imputed Family Income/Personal Earnings Files. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Health Statistics. http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/about/major/nhis/2005imputedincome.htm. Cited 15 May 2007
14. Harrell FE (2001) Regression modeling strategies: with applications to linear models, logistic regression, and survival analysis. Springer, New York
15. JT Vetto AJ Wheeler M Toomey, et al. 2006 Outcomes among women younger than age 40 in a state breast cancer screening program Am J Surg 191 635 640 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.035 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2006.01.035 16647351
16. AN Tosteson NK Stout DG Fryback, et al. 2008 Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography breast cancer screening Ann Intern Med 148 1 10 18166758
17. BC Yankaskas 2005 Epidemiology of breast cancer in young women Breast Dis 23 3 8 16823161
18. K Armstrong E Moye S Williams, et al. 2007 Screening mammography in women 40-49 years of age: a systematic review for the American College of Physicians Ann Intern Med 146 516 526 17404354
19. JG Elmore MB Barton VM Moceri, et al. 1998 Ten-year risk of false positive screening mammograms and clinical breast examinations N Engl J Med 338 1089 1096 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601 10.1056/NEJM199804163381601 1:STN:280:DyaK1c7ps1Kitw%3D%3D 9545356 (Pubitemid 28227478)
20. A Jemal R Siegel E Ward, et al. 2008 Cancer statistics, 2008 CA Cancer J Clin 58 71 96 10.3322/CA.2007.0010 10.3322/CA.2007.0010 18287387