Bacteriological characterization of wastewater samples obtained from a primary treatment system on a small scale swine farm

Bioresource Technology

Volumn 101, Issue 9, 2010, Pages 2938-2944

  Cordero, A ^a   Garcia M ^a   Herradora, M ^a   Ramirez G ^a   Martinez R ^a  

^a UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL AUTÓNOMA DE MÉXICO   (Mexico)

Author keywords

Clostridium spp.; Enteric bacteria; Salmonella spp.; Swine farm residues

Indexed keywords

ADDITIONAL TREATMENT; CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS; DETECTION LIMITS; E. COLI; ENTERIC BACTERIA; LIQUID FRACTION; POPULATION LEVELS; PRIMARY TREATMENT; SALMONELLA SPP; SEDIMENTATION BASIN; SMALL SCALE; SWINE FARM; WASTEWATER SAMPLES; WET WEIGHT;

BACTERIOLOGY; CLOSTRIDIUM; ELECTRIC CIRCUIT BREAKERS; ESCHERICHIA COLI; FARMS; SALMONELLA; WASTEWATER; WASTEWATER TREATMENT;

LIQUIDS;

BACTERIOLOGY; BACTERIUM; LIVESTOCK FARMING; SEPARATION; WASTE TREATMENT; WASTEWATER;

ARTICLE; BACTERIUM DETECTION; BACTERIUM IDENTIFICATION; BACTERIUM ISOLATION; CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELIMINATION REACTION; ERYSIPELOTHRIX RHUSIOPATHIAE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; NONHUMAN; PIG FARMING; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SALMONELLA; SEDIMENTATION; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; WASTE WATER MANAGEMENT; WASTE WATER RECYCLING;

ANIMAL HUSBANDRY; ANIMALS; BACTERIAL TYPING TECHNIQUES; CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS; COLONY COUNT, MICROBIAL; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; ERYSIPELOTHRIX; ESCHERICHIA COLI; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; SALMONELLA; SWINE; TEMPERATURE; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER MICROBIOLOGY; WATER PURIFICATION;

CLOSTRIDIUM; CLOSTRIDIUM PERFRINGENS; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; SALMONELLA; SALMONELLA CHOLERAESUIS; SUIDAE;

EID: 74749095860     PISSN: 09608524     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.biortech.2009.11.072     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Baggesen D.L., Wegener H.C., Bager F., Stege H., and Christensen J. Herd prevalence of Salmonella enterica infections in Danish slaughter pigs determined by microbiological testing. Prev. Vet. Med. 26 (1996) 201-213
2. Baloda B.S., Christensen L., and Trajcevska S. Persistence of a Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium DT12 clone in a piggery and in agricultural soil amended with Salmonella-contaminated slurry. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 67 6 (2001) 2859-2862
3. Carter, G.R., 1994. Bacteriología y Micología Veterinarias, 2da ed. El Manual Moderno, Mexico, D.F.
4. Chern C.E., Tsai Y.L., and Olson H.B. Occurrence of genes associated with enterotoxigenic and enterohemorrhagic Escherichia coli in agricultural waste lagoons. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 70 (2004) 356-362
5. Cortinas, N.P., 2003. Danger for health by water contamination. First International Workshop on Aquifer Vulnerability and Risk, May 29-30, Guanajuato, Mexico. National Water Commission, Mexico, p. 65.
6. Davies, P., Funk, J., Turkson, P., ÓCarroll, J., Nichols, M., Gebreyes, W., 2002. Effects of methods on the isolation of Salmonellas from preweaning piglets with diarrhoea in Vietnam. In: 17th Congress of the International Pig Veterinary Society, vol. 2, 2-5 June, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA, p. 42.
7. Ethan B.S., Sima Y., and Karl R.M. Transmission of Escherichia coli O157:H7 from contaminated manure and irrigation water to lettuce plant tissue and its subsequent internalization. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1 (2002) 397-400
8. Gray J.T., and Fedorka-Cray P.J. Survival and infectivity of Salmonella choleraesuis in swine feces. J. Food Prot. 64 (2001) 945-949
9. Henry D.P., Frost A.J., O'Boyle D.A., and Cameron R.D. The isolation of Salmonellas from piggery waste water after orthodox pondage treatment. Aus. Vet. J. 72 12 (1995) 478-479
10. Hernández, C.B., 1997. Determinación de bacterias patógenas en ensilados de excretas porcinas con caña de azúcar (Bachelor thesis). Facultad de Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México.
11. Hoszowski A., and Wasyl D. Salmonella spp. found in waste, sewage sludge, compost and their antimicrobial resistance. Bull. Vet. Inst. Pulawy. 45 (2001) 163-170
12. INEGI (Instituto Nacional de Geografía e Informática), 2004. Anuario Estadístico del Estado de México. INEGI, Mexico, D.F., p. 120.
13. Iñigo D.C., Angelo I.S., Soto C.S., and Alcaíno H. Caracterización bacteriológica y parasitológica del desecho fecal porcino en Chile. Avances en Ciencias Veterinarias 6 1 (1991) 23-28
14. Jiang X., Morgan J., and Doyle P.M. Fate de Escherichia coli O147:H7 in manure-amended soil. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 68 5 (2002) 2605-2609
15. Jones W.P. The effect of temperature, solids content and pH on the survival of Salmonellas in cattle slurry. Br. Vet. J. 132 (1976) 284
16. Jones F., and Watkins J. Microbial aspects of water management. J. Appl. Bact., Symp. Suppl. 59 (1985) 27-36
17. Krieg N.R., and Holt J.G. Bergeýs Manual of Systematic Bacteriology vol. 2 (1984), Williams and Wilkins, Baltimore, USA
18. León, D.J.S., 1995. Impacto ecológico de la producción animal intensiva. El caso de la porcicultura. En: Luis Kato Maldonado (Ed.), La Producción Porcícola en México: Contribución al Desarrollo de Una Visión Integral. Universidad Autónoma Metropolitana, Mexico, pp. 277-290.
19. Leung K., and Topp E. Bacterial community dynamics in liquid swine manure during storage: molecular analysis using DGGE/PCR of 16S rDNA. FEMS Microbiol. Ecol. 38 (2001) 169-177
20. Madigan, M., Martinko, J., Parker, J., 2000. Brock Biología de los Microorganismos, 10th ed. Prentice Hall Madrid, España, p. 200.
21. Martínez-Gamba R., Pradal-Roa P., Castrejón P.F., Herradora M., Galván E., and Mercado C. Persistence of Escherichia coli, Salmonella choleraesuis, Aujeszky's disease virus, Blue Eye disease virus in ensilages based on the solid fraction of the faeces. J. Appl. Microbiol. 91 (2001) 750-758
22. Mateu A., Mata-Alvarez J., and Parés R. Enterobacterial and viral decay experimental models for anaerobic digestion of piggery waste. Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 38 (1992) 291-296
23. Olson L.D. Survival of Serpulina hyodysenteriae in a effluent lagoon. J. Am. Vet. Med. Assoc. 207 (1995) 1470-1472
24. Pérez, E.R., 1997. Porcicultura y medio ambiente. Memorias II Seminario de Manejo y Reciclaje de Residuos Porcinos. Consejo Mexicano de Porcicultores, Octubre 22-25. Querétaro, México, pp. 10-12.
25. Pérez, E.R., 2006. Granjas Porcinas y Medio Ambiente. Instituto de Investigaciones Económicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, México, D.F., p. 201.
26. Quinn, P.J., Carter, G.R., 1994. Clinical Veterinary Microbiology, first ed. London, UK, p. 258.
27. Rajic, A., Muckle, A., McFall, M., Deckert, A., Dewey, C., McEwen, S., Manninen, K., 2002. Salmonella occurrence and serotype diversity on 90 finishing farms in Alberta. In: 17th Congress of the International Pig Veterinary Society, vol. 1, 2-5 June, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA, p. 315.
28. Ramírez G., Martínez R., Herradora M., Castrejón F., and Galván E. Isolation of Salmonella spp. from liquid and solid excreta prior to and following ensilage in ten swine farms located in central México. Bioresour. Technol. 96 (2005) 587-595
29. SAS. SAS/STAT. User Guide. Procedure Guide for Personal Computers. Ver. 6 (1998), SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA
30. Strauch, D., 1991. Survival of pathogenic microorganisms and parasites in excreta, manures and sewage sludge. In: Office International des Epizooties (Ed.), Animals Pathogens and the Environment, vol. 10. Scientific and Technical Review, USA, p. 3.
31. Strauch D., and Ballarini G. Hygienic aspects of the production and agricultural use of animal wastes. J. Vet. Med. B 41 (1994) 176-228
32. Taiganides, P.E., Pérez, E.R., Girón, S.E., 1996. Manual Para el Manejo y Control de Aguas Residuales y Excretas Porcinas en México. Consejo Mexicano de Porcicultores, Octubre 22-25. Querétaro, México, pp. 77-80.
33. Tinoco, J.L., 2004. La Porcicultura Mexicana y el TLCAN, primera ed. Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico, p. 218.
34. Van der Wolf P.J., and Peperkamp N.H.T.M. Salmonellae types and their resistance patterns in pig faecal and post-mortem samples. Vet. Quart. 23 (2001) 175-181
35. Walker P.M., Kelley T.R., and Smiciklas K.D. Evaluation of pulverized trammel fines for use as a soil amendment. Bioresour. Technol. 99 (2008) 7848-7858
36. WHO. Chemistry Security International Program. second ed. (2000), World Health Organization