Comparing methods of measurement: Extending the LoA by regression

Statistics in Medicine

Volumn 29, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 401-410

  Carstensen, Bendix ^a  

^a STENO DIABETES CENTER   (Denmark)

Author keywords

Agreement; Bland altman plot; Calibration; Differences vs averages; Method comparison; Non constant difference; Prediction; Regression

Indexed keywords

GLUCOSE;

ARTICLE; CALIBRATION; CONTROLLED STUDY; GLUCOSE BLOOD LEVEL; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LIMITS OF AGREEMENT; MEASUREMENT; PLASMA VOLUME; PREDICTION; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SIMULATION; STANDARD; VARIANCE;

BLOOD GLUCOSE; BODY WATER; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 74749091726     PISSN: 02776715     EISSN: 10970258     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/sim.3769     Document Type: Article

References (5)

1. Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 1999; 8:136-160.
2. Carstensen B, Simpson J, Gurrin LC. Statistical models for assessing agreement in method comparison studies with replicate measurements. International Journal of Biostatistics 2008; 4(1):Article 16.
3. Carstensen B, Lindström J, Sundvall J, Borch-Johnsen K, Tuomilehto J, DPS Study Group. Measurement of blood glucose: comparison between different types of specimens. Annals of Clinical Biochemistry 2008; 45(2):140-148.
4. Cornbleet PJ, Gochman N. Incorrect least-squares regression coefficients in method-comparison analysis. Clinical Chemistry 1973; 25(3):432-438.
5. Jensen AC. Deming regression. Technical Report, Vignette for the MethComp package for R, 2007. Available from: http://staff.pubhealth.ku.dk/~bxc/ MethComp/Deming.pdf.