-
1
-
-
85022940326
-
-
[1988] E.C.R. 5483.
-
(1988)
E.C.R.
, pp. 5483
-
-
-
2
-
-
85022927106
-
-
[1987] E.C.R. 4199;
-
(1987)
E.C.R.
, pp. 4199
-
-
-
3
-
-
79851468884
-
-
[1988] 3 C.M.L.R. 57.
-
(1988)
C.M.L.R.
, vol.3
, pp. 57
-
-
-
4
-
-
85022941660
-
-
[1974] E.C.R. 33;
-
(1974)
E.C.R.
, pp. 33
-
-
-
5
-
-
84876175784
-
-
[1974] 1 C.M.L.R. 523.
-
(1974)
C.M.L.R.
, vol.1
, pp. 523
-
-
-
6
-
-
85022924386
-
-
[1986] E.C.R. 117.
-
(1986)
E.C.R.
, pp. 117
-
-
-
7
-
-
85022914381
-
-
[1987] E.C.R. 3639.
-
(1987)
E.C.R.
, pp. 3639
-
-
-
8
-
-
85022914021
-
-
[1990] E.C.R. 1–3365.
-
(1990)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-3365
-
-
-
9
-
-
85022946531
-
-
Commission Reg.2124/85.
-
Commission Reg.2124/85 (1985) O.J. L198/31.
-
(1985)
O.J.
, pp. L198/31
-
-
-
10
-
-
85022950364
-
-
[1991] E.C.R. 1–935.
-
(1991)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-935
-
-
-
11
-
-
85022949346
-
-
(1993) OJ. C39/6.
-
(1993)
OJ.
, pp. C39/6
-
-
-
12
-
-
85022961453
-
-
(1995) OJ. C312/8.
-
(1995)
OJ.
, pp. C312/8
-
-
-
13
-
-
85022985000
-
-
Case 44/84
-
Case 44/84, [1986] E.C.R. 298;
-
(1986)
E.C.R.
, pp. 298
-
-
-
14
-
-
85022984708
-
-
[1986] 2 C.M.L.R. 1.
-
(1986)
C.M.L.R.
, vol.2
, pp. 1
-
-
-
15
-
-
85022939859
-
-
[1960] E.C.R. 1125.
-
(1960)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1125
-
-
-
16
-
-
85022927032
-
-
[1979] E.C.R. 2923.
-
(1979)
E.C.R.
, pp. 2923
-
-
-
17
-
-
85022928052
-
-
[1984] E.C.R. 1891.
-
(1984)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1891
-
-
-
18
-
-
85022978547
-
-
[1984] E.C.R. 1921.
-
(1984)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1921
-
-
-
19
-
-
85022945130
-
-
[1990] E.C.R. 1–4135.
-
(1990)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1–4135
-
-
-
20
-
-
85022960397
-
-
[1991] E.C.R. 1–5357.
-
(1991)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-5357
-
-
-
21
-
-
85022975110
-
-
Case C-392/93 ex p. British Telecommunications pic (26 Mar. 19%)
-
Case C-392/93 R. v. H.M. Treasury ex p. British Telecommunications pic (26 Mar. 19%), ECJ.
-
ECJ.
-
-
-
22
-
-
85022976035
-
-
[1991] E.C.R. 1–6079;
-
(1991)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-6079
-
-
-
23
-
-
80053140112
-
-
[1992] 1 C.M.L.R. 245.
-
(1992)
C.M.L.R.
, vol.1
, pp. 245
-
-
-
24
-
-
85022917901
-
-
Case 68/88.
-
Case 68/88 Commission v. Greece [1989] E.C.R. 2965.
-
(1989)
E.C.R.
, pp. 2965
-
-
-
25
-
-
85022925742
-
-
Case C-2/88 Zwartveld.
-
Case C-2/88 Zwartveld [1990] E.C.R. 1–3365.
-
(1990)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-3365
-
-
-
26
-
-
85022920973
-
-
(1991) O.J. L288–32.
-
(1991)
O.J.
, pp. L288-32
-
-
-
27
-
-
85022947038
-
-
(1992) O.J. L231/26.
-
(1992)
O.J.
, pp. L231/26
-
-
-
28
-
-
85022942073
-
-
Case C-450/93.
-
Case C-450/93 Kalanke v. Freie Hansestadt Bremen [1995] E.C.R. 1–3051.
-
(1995)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-3051
-
-
-
29
-
-
85022939516
-
-
(1994) O.J. L254/64.
-
(1994)
O.J.
, pp. L254/64
-
-
-
30
-
-
85022967027
-
-
[1991] E.C.R. 1–6079.
-
(1991)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-6079
-
-
-
31
-
-
85022941714
-
-
(1990) OJ. L78/23.
-
(1990)
OJ.
, pp. L78/23
-
-
-
32
-
-
85022943259
-
-
(1990) OJ. L78/25.
-
(1990)
OJ.
, pp. L78/25
-
-
-
34
-
-
85022967614
-
-
[1994] E.C.R. 1–5267.
-
(1994)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-5267
-
-
-
35
-
-
85022959969
-
-
[1983] E.C.R. 3663;
-
(1983)
E.C.R.
, pp. 3663
-
-
-
36
-
-
85022954204
-
-
[1985] 1 C.M.L.R. 220.
-
(1985)
C.M.L.R.
, vol.1
, pp. 220
-
-
-
37
-
-
0003664705
-
-
21 Dec.
-
Agence Europe, 21 Dec. 1996.
-
(1996)
Agence Europe
-
-
-
40
-
-
85022957226
-
-
(1996) OJ. L140/52.
-
(1996)
OJ.
, pp. L140/52
-
-
-
41
-
-
85022969840
-
-
[1991] E.C.R. 1–3479;
-
(1991)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-3479
-
-
-
42
-
-
85022964708
-
-
[1991] 3 C.M.L.R. 325.
-
(1991)
C.M.L.R.
, vol.3
, pp. 325
-
-
-
43
-
-
85022974191
-
Continental Irish Meat
-
Case 125/84
-
Case 125/84 Continental Irish Meat [1985] E.C.R. 3441;
-
(1985)
E.C.R.
, pp. 3441
-
-
-
44
-
-
85022976978
-
-
[1985] 3 C.M.L.R. 713.
-
(1985)
C.M.L.R.
, vol.3
, pp. 713
-
-
-
45
-
-
85022984817
-
-
[1991] E.C.R. 1–6079;
-
(1991)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-6079
-
-
-
46
-
-
80053140112
-
-
[1992] 1 C.M.L.R. 245.
-
(1992)
C.M.L.R.
, vol.1
, pp. 245
-
-
-
47
-
-
85022971266
-
-
Opinion 1/92.
-
Opinion 1/92 [1992] E.C.R. 1–2821.
-
(1992)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-2821
-
-
-
48
-
-
84937277872
-
Some Questions Raised by the Restamark Judgment
-
For further discussion see
-
For further discussion see Kronenberger, “Some Questions Raised by the Restamark Judgment” (1996) 45 I.C.L.Q. 198.
-
(1996)
I.C.L.Q.
, vol.45
, pp. 198
-
-
Kronenberger1
-
49
-
-
85022839419
-
-
[1995] 1 C.M.L.R. 161.
-
(1995)
C.M.L.R.
, vol.1
, pp. 161
-
-
-
50
-
-
85022937923
-
-
[1993] E.C.R. 1–1277.
-
(1993)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-1277
-
-
-
51
-
-
85022957664
-
-
[1979] E.C.R. 2575, 2596.
-
(1979)
E.C.R.
-
-
-
52
-
-
85022968817
-
-
e.g. Case 45/86.
-
e.g. Case 45/86 Commission v. Council [1987] E.C.R. 1493.
-
(1987)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1493
-
-
-
53
-
-
85022962129
-
-
See Case 90/74.
-
See Case 90/74 Deboeck v. Commission [1975] E.C.R. 1123.
-
(1975)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1123
-
-
-
54
-
-
85022961804
-
-
Case 259/87.
-
Case 259/87 France v. Commission [1987] E.C.R. 4393.
-
(1987)
E.C.R.
, pp. 4393
-
-
-
55
-
-
85022955204
-
-
[1993] E.C.R. 1–3605.
-
(1993)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-3605
-
-
-
56
-
-
85022934367
-
-
[1976] E.C.R. 1473.
-
(1976)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1473
-
-
-
57
-
-
85022977372
-
-
Though Advocate-General Warner did not give an opinion in such a case until Case 143/78. which was heard (if not registered) after the Accession Convention had been signed.
-
Though Advocate-General Warner did not give an opinion in such a case until Case 143/78 De Cavel v. De Cavel [1979] E.C.R. 1055. which was heard (if not registered) after the Accession Convention had been signed.
-
(1979)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1055
-
-
-
58
-
-
85022969650
-
-
See. to take a couple of random examples. Case 60/81 or Case C-49/88
-
See. to take a couple of random examples. Case 60/81 IBM v. Commission [1981] E.C.R. 2639 or Case C-49/88
-
(1981)
E.C.R.
, pp. 2639
-
-
-
59
-
-
85022980320
-
-
Al-Jubail Fertiliser v. Council [1991] E.C.R. 1–3187.
-
(1991)
E.C.R.
, pp. 1-3187
-
-
|