Predicting Eurasian watermilfoil invasions in Minnesota

Lake and Reservoir Management

Volumn 24, Issue 4, 2008, Pages 361-369

  Roley, Sarah S ^a,b   Newman, Raymond M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF NOTRE DAME   (United States)

Author keywords

Eurasian watermilfoil; invasive species; Minnesota; predictive models

Indexed keywords

MYRIOPHYLLUM SPICATUM;

EID: 74749083451     PISSN: 07438141     EISSN: 10402381     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/07438140809354846     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Buchan, L.A.J. and D.K. Padilla. 2000. Predicting the likelihood of Eurasian watermilfoil presence in lakes, a macrophyte monitoring tool. Ecol. Appl. 10:1442-1455.
2. Cheruvelil, K.S., P.A. Soranno, J.D. Madsen and M.J. Roberson. 2002. Plant architecture and epiphytic macroinvertebrate communities: the role of an exotic dissected macrophyte. J. N. Am. Benthol. Soc. 21:261-277.
3. Cook, R.D. and S. Weisberg. 2004. Arc 1.06. University of Minnesota, School of Statistics, St. Paul, MN.
4. Cook, R.D. and L. Ni. 2005. Sufficient dimension reduction via inverse regression: a minimum discrepancy approach. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 100:410-428.
5. ESRI. 2004. ArcGIS 9. Environmental Systems Research Institute, Redlands, California, USA.
6. Invasive Species Program. 2005. Invasive species of aquatic plants and wild animals in Minnesota: Annual report for 2004. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 500 Lafayette Rd., St. Paul, MN, 55155.
7. Invasive Species Program. 2006. Invasive species of aquatic plants and wild animals in Minnesota: Annual report for 2005. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, 500 Lafayette Rd., St. Paul, MN, 55155.
8. Keast, A. 1984. The introduced aquatic macrophyte, Myriophyllum spicatum, as habitat for fish and their invertebrate prey. Can. J. Zool. 62:1289-1303.
9. Lodge, D.M. 1993. Biological invasions: lessons for ecology. Trends Ecol. Evol. 8:133-137.
10. Lodge, D.M., S. Williams, H.J. MacIsaac, K.R. Hayes, B. Leung, S. Reichard, R.N. Mack, P.B. Moyle, M. Smith, D.A. Andow, J.T. Carlton and A. McMichael. 2006. Biological invasions: Recommendations for US policy and management. Ecol. Appl. 16:2035-2054.
11. Madsen, J.D., L.W. Eichler and C.W. Boylen. 1988. Vegetative spread of Eurasian watermilfoil in Lake George, New York. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 26:47-50.
12. Madsen, J.D., J.W. Sutherland, J.A. Bloomfield, L.W. Eichler and C.W. Boylen. 1991. The decline of native vegetation under dense Eurasian watermilfoil canopies. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 26:47-50.
13. Madsen, J.D. 1998. Predicting invasion success of Eurasian watermilfoil. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 36:28-32.
14. Makela, S., E. Huitu and L. Arvola. 2004. Spatial patterns in aquatic vegetation composition and environmental covariates along chains of lakes in the Kokemdenjoki watershed (S. Finland). Aquat. Bot. 80:253-269
15. McCune, B. and J.B. Grace. 2002. Analysis of Ecological Communities. Mjm Software Design, Gleneden Beach, OR.
16. MDNR. 2005. Notice of waters identified and designated as infested waters. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, St. Paul, MN. http://files.dnr.state.mn.us/eco/invasives/infestedwaters- newmilfoil.pdf
17. Moyle, J.B. 1945. Some chemical factors influencing the distribution of aquatic plants in Minnesota. Am. Midl. Nat. 34:402-420.
18. Moyle, J.B. 1946. Some indices of lake productivity. Trans. Am. Fish. Soc. 76:322-334.
19. Nichols, S.A. and B.A. Shaw. 1986. Ecological life histories of the three aquatic nuisance plants, Myriophyllum spicatum, Potamogeton crispus and Elodea canadensis. Hydrobiolgia. 131:3-21.
20. Nichols, S.A. 1994. Evaluation of invasions and declines of submersed macrophytes for the upper Great Lakes region. Lake Reserv. Manage. 10:29-33.
21. Nichols, S.A. and L.A.J. Buchan. 1997. Use of native macrophytes as indicators of suitable Eurasian watermilfoil habitat in Wisconsin lakes. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 35:21-24.
22. Olden, J.D. and D.A. Jackson. 2000. Torturing data for the sake of generality: how valid are our regression models? Ecoscience. 7:501-510.
23. Olden, J.D. and D.A. Jackson. 2002. A comparison of statistical approaches for modeling fish species distributions. Freshw. Biol. 47:1976-1995.
24. Ramcharan, C.W., D.K. Padilla and S.I. Dodson. 1992. Models to predict potential occurrence and density of the zebra mussel, Dreissena polymorpha. Can J. Fish. Aquat. Sci. 49:2611-2620.
25. Rorslett B. 1991. Principal determinants of aquatic macrophyte richness in northern European lakes. Aquat. Bot. 39:172-193.
26. SAS. 2002. JMP® Statistics and graphics guide, Version 5. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC.
27. Schupp, D.H. 1992. An ecological classification of Minnesota lakes with associated fish communities. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Invest. Rep. 417, St. Paul, MN.
28. Smith, C.S. and J.W. Barko. 1990. Ecology of Eurasian watermilfoil. J. Aquat. Plant Manage. 28:55-64.
29. Valley, R.D., T.K. Cross and P. Radomski. 2004. The role of submersed aquatic vegetation as habitat for fish in Minnesota lakes, including the implications of non-native plant invasions and their management. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Spec. Pub. 160. St. Paul, MN 55155. 25 pp.
30. Van den Berg, M.S., W. Joosse and H. Coops. 2003. A statistical model predicting the occurrence and dynamics of submerged macrophytes in shallow lakes in the Netherlands. Hydrobiologia. 506-509:611-623.