Qualitative methods and the evaluation of community renewal programs in Australia: Towards a national framework

Urban Policy and Research

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 97-114

  Judd, Bruce ^a   Randolph, Bill ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NEW SOUTH WALES   (Australia)

Author keywords

Community regeneration; Evaluation; Public housing; Qualitative methods; Renewal

Indexed keywords

EID: 74649087137     PISSN: 08111146     EISSN: 14767244     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08111140600591047     Document Type: Article

References (62)

1. Alterman, R., and Cars, G., 1991. Neighbourhood Regeneration—An International Evaluation, London: Mansell.
2. Argyle Community Housing. c1998. Home and Housed: Making Housing Management Work, Sydney: Department of Urban Affairs and Planning. Occasional Paper Series Publication 1, NSW
3. Arthurson, K., 1998. Redevelopment of public housing estates: the Australian experience. Urban Policy and Research, 16 (1): 35–46.
4. Arthurson, K., 1999. Salisbury North Urban Improvement Project—Evaluation of Stage One Key Performance Indicators, Adelaide: University of Adelaide.
5. Arthurson, K., 2000. Achieving Social Justice in Urban Regeneration: The Impact of Image Construction presented to the European Network for Housing Research Conference 26–30 June 2000, Gavle Sweden
6. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. 2005. Commonwealth–State Housing Agreement National Data Reports: Public Rental Housing 2004–5, Canberra: AIHW.
7. Bailey, N., 1995. Partnership Agencies in British Urban Policy, London: University College London Press.
8. Beaudoux, E., Crombrugge, G., de, Douxchamps, F., Gueneau, M.-C., and Nieuwkert, M., 1992. Supporting Development Action from Identification to Evaluation, London: Macmillan.
9. Beer, A. (2005) Telephone conversation.
10. Biggins, N., and Hassan, R., 1998. Northfield Precinct 1: A Review of the Social Objectives, Adelaide: Flinders University of South Australia. prepared for the Land Management Corporation, South Australian Housing Trust and Hillcrest Community Fund
11. Bradford, M., and Robson, B., 1995. “ An evaluation of urban policy ”. In Urban Policy Evaluation: Challenge and Change, Edited by: Hambleton, R., and Thomas, H., 37–54. London: Paul Chapman.
12. Brennan, A., Rhodes, J., Tyler, P., and Warnock, C., 2001. Neighbourhood Regeneration: Lessons and Evaluation Evidence from 10 SRB Case Studies. Mid Term Report, Department of Land Economy, University of Cambridge.
13. Carley, M., 1995. Using Information for Sustainable Regeneration, Edinburgh: Scottish Homes. Innovation Study No. 4
14. Carson, E., King, S., Walker, D., and Tesoriero, F., 1998a. Community Perceptions of Social Outcomes of Urban Renewal in Mitchell Park, Adelaide: Social Policy Research Group, University of South Australia.
15. Carson, E., King, S., Walker, D., and Tesoriero, F., 1998b. Community Perceptions of Social Outcomes of Urban Renewal in Rosewood, Adelaide: Social Policy Research Group, University of South Australia.
16. Carter, T., 1991. “ A neighbourhood improvement: the Canadian experience ”. In Neighbourhood Regeneration: An International Evaluation, Edited by: Alterman, R., and Cars, G., 9–26. London: Mansell.
17. Châtel, V., and Soulet, M., 2001. An Evaluation Tool of Social Re-integration: The Analytic Evaluation, Vienna: Independent Centre for Comparative Research in the Social Sciences.
18. Dalton, T. (2004) Pubic housing in Australia: disabling objective. Paper presented at the 19th EAROPH World Planning and Housing Congress and Australian National Housing Conference 2004, Melbourne, 19–23 September.
19. Department of the Environment. 1994. Assessing the Impact of Urban Policy, London: HMSO.
20. Dept of Land Economy. 1997. Evaluation of Regeneration Activities Funded Under the Single Regeneration Budget Bidding Round: The Evaluation Framework, Cambridge: University of Cambridge. Discussion Paper No. 83
21. Dixon, J., 1995. Community stories and indicators for evaluating community development. Community Development Journal, 30: 327–336.
22. ERM Mitchell McCotter. 1998. Evaluation of Homeswest's New Living Program in Kwinana and Lockridge Final Report for Homeswest, Perth, Western Australia
23. Giorgi, L., ed. 2003. “ EUROHOME-IMPACT: The Housing Dimension of Welfare Reform ”. Vienna: International Centre for Comparative Research in the Social Sciences. HPSE-CT-1999-00030, Final Report, May 2003
24. Glesne, C., 1999. “ Meeting qualitative enquiry ”. In Becoming Qualitative Researchers: An Introduction, 2nd edn, New York: Longman.
25. Hayward, D., 1996. The reluctant landlords? A history of public housing. Urban Policy and Research, 14 (1): 5–35.
26. Ho, S. Y., 1999. Evaluating urban regeneration programs in Britain. Evaluation, 5 (4): 422–438.
27. Hulse, K., T., Herbert, and Down, K., 2004. Kensington Estate Redevelopment Social Impact Study Institute for Social Research, Swinburne University of Technology
28. Jones, A., and Seelig, T., 2004. Understanding and Enhancing Research–Policy Linkages in Australian Housing: A Discussion Paper, Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
29. Malpass, P., and Murie, A., 1982. Housing Policy and Practice, London: Macmillan.
30. Maxwell, J., 1996. “ Validity: how might you be wrong ”. In Qualitative Research Design: An Interactive Approach, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
31. McGregor, A., and Maclennan, D., 1992. A Review and Critical Evaluation of Strategic Approaches to Urban Regeneration, Edinburgh: Scottish Homes. Research Report No. 22
32. Montague, S. (1998) Build reach into your logic model, performance management network. Available at http://www.pmn.net
33. Murtagh, B., 1998. Evaluating the community impacts of urban policy. Planning Practice and Research, 13 (2): 129–138.
34. National Capital Planning Authority (NCPA). 1993. Restructuring Public Housing Precincts, Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Occasional Paper Series 1, paper 4 prepared for the Better Cities Program
35. NSW DoH. 2005. Draft Community Regeneration Strategy 2005–2010, Ashfield: NSW Department of Housing.
36. Office of the Deputy Prime Minister (ODPM). 2004. Assessing the Impacts of Spatial Intervention: The 3Rs Guidance, London: HMSO.
37. Parry, S., and Strommen, L., 2001. New Living Report: An Assessment of Impacts on Tenants and the Community in the Urban Renewal of Lockridge and Langford, Western Australia, Hawthorn: Swinburne University of Technology. research project for Grad Dip in Housing Management and Policy
38. Pawson, R., and Tilley, N., 1997. Realistic Evaluation, London: Sage.
39. Peel, M., 1995. Good Times Hard Times: The Past and the Future in Elizabeth, Carlton: Melbourne University Press.
40. Priemus, H., and Metselaar, G., 1992. Urban Renewal in a European Perspective: An International Comparative Analysis, OTB Research Institute for Policy Science and Technology, Delft: Delft University Press.
41. Queensland Treasury. 2004. Making Community Renewal Outcomes Oriented: Community Renewal Performance Measurement and Evaluation Framework; Framing the Successes Behind the Stories, Brisbane: Office of Economic and Statistical Research, Queensland Treasury. Report to Community Renewal Program
42. Randolph, B., and Holloway, D., 2004. The suburbanisation of disadvantage: new problems, new policies. Opolis, 1 (1): 49–65.
43. Randolph, B., and Judd, B., 2000. Community renewal and large public housing estates. Urban Policy and Research, 8 (1): 91–104.
44. Randolph, B. & Judd, B. (2001a) A framework for evaluating neighbourhood renewal—lessons learned from New South Wales and South Australia, National Housing Conference, Brisbane, October 2001.
45. Randolph, B., and Judd, B., 2001b. Salisbury North Urban Improvement Project Monitoring and Evaluation Framework: Final Report, Campbelltown: Urban Frontiers Program, University of Western Sydney.
46. Randolph, B., and Wood, M., 2004. The Benefits of Tenure Diversification, Final Report, Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.
47. Randolph, B., Judd, C. & Carmichael, C. (2000) Evaluation of the Neighbourhood Improvement Program for the NSW Department of Housing, Unpublished Report, Urban Frontiers Program UWS and the Faculty of the Built Environment UNSW.
48. Rogers, N., and Slowinski, K., 2004. Towards an Evaluation Framework for Urban Regeneration in South Australia: Discussion Paper South Australian Department for Families and Communities
49. Ruediger, M., Social impacts of urban renewal and relocation on public housing tenants in Hillcrest. BA Hons Thesis. Flinders University of South Australia.
50. Salvaris, M., 2003. Neighbourhood Renewal Strategy, DHS Victoria: Final Report of Evaluation Consultants, Hawthorn: Institute for Social Research, Swinburne University of Technology.
51. Samuels, R., Judd, B, O'Brien, E., and Barton, J., 2004. Linkages Between Housing, Policing and Other Interventions for Crime and Harassment Reduction in Areas with Public Housing Concentrations, Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute. Final Report
52. Scottish Social Inclusion Network. 1999. Social Inclusion Strategy Evaluation Framework Action Team Progress Report, Edinburgh: The Scottish Office Social Inclusion Division.
53. Spiller Gibbins Swan (SGS) Pty Ltd (2000) Public Housing Estate Renewal in Australia, Project No. 212 (Australian Housing Research Fund).
54. Stubbs, J., and Hardy, M., 2000. Evaluation of Three Neighbourhood Renewal Strategies NSW Department of Housing, Judith Stubbs and Associates, and Twyford Consulting
55. Stubbs, J., and Storer, J., 1996. Social Cost Benefit analysis of NSW Department of Housing's Neighbourhood Improvement Program, Case Study Aven: Airds, Report for NSW Department of Housing, Western Sydney Region
56. Taylor, M., 1995. Unleashing the Potential: Bringing Residents to the Centre of Regeneration, York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
57. Van Vliet, W., and Van Weesep, J., eds. 1990. “ Government and housing: developments in seven countries ”. In Urban Affairs Annual Reviews, Vol. 36, Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
58. Victorian Department of Human Services (VDHS). 2002. Neighbourhood Renewal Evaluation Framework 2002–2003 Melbourne
59. Victorian Department of Human Services (VDHS). 2005. Neighbourhood Renewal: Interim Evaluation Report 2005, Melbourne: Neighbourhood Renewal Branch.
60. Walsh, P., and Butler, K., 2001. Transforming Places, Engaging People: Community Renewal Evaluation Main Report, Brisbane: Queensland Department of Housing.
61. Wholey, J., 1987. “ Evaluability assessment: developing program theory ”. In Using Program Theory in Evaluation, New Directions for Program Evaluation, Edited by: Bickman, L., San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. No. 33
62. Wood, M., 2003. Resident Participation in Neighbourhood Renewal, Final Report, Melbourne: Australian Housing and Urban Research Institute.