California offshore wind energy potential

Renewable Energy

Volumn 35, Issue 6, 2010, Pages 1244-1254

  Dvorak, Michael J ^a   Archer, Cristina L ^b   Jacobson, Mark Z ^a  

^a Stanford University   (United States)

^b CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Bathymetry; California; Mesoscale modeling; MM5; Offshore wind energy; Resource assessment

Indexed keywords

CALIFORNIA; DEEP WATER; DEVELOPMENT POTENTIAL; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; HIGH RESOLUTION; HORIZONTAL RESOLUTION; HUB HEIGHT; INITIAL ESTIMATE; MESOSCALE METEOROLOGICAL MODEL; MESOSCALE MODELING; MM5; OFF-SHORE WIND ENERGY; OFFSHORE BUOYS; OFFSHORE WIND ENERGY RESOURCE; OFFSHORE WIND FARMS; OFFSHORE WIND TURBINES; OFFSHORE WINDS; RESOURCE ASSESSMENTS; SHALLOW WATERS; TURBINE FOUNDATIONS; WATER DEPTH; WIND ENERGY RESOURCES; WIND FARM; WIND SPEED;

BATHYMETRY; ELECTRIC GENERATORS; ELECTRIC UTILITIES; ENERGY RESOURCES; FARMS; OFFSHORE POWER PLANTS; WATER RESOURCES; WIND TURBINES;

WIND POWER;

BATHYMETRIC SURVEY; CARBON EMISSION; DEEP WATER; ELECTRICITY GENERATION; MESOSCALE METEOROLOGY; OFFSHORE APPLICATION; RENEWABLE RESOURCE; RESOURCE ASSESSMENT; WATER DEPTH; WIND FARM; WIND POWER; WIND TURBINE;

CALIFORNIA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 74649084468     PISSN: 09601481     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.renene.2009.11.022     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Global Wind Energy Council. Global wind 2008 report. Available from: (2009). http://www.gwec.net/fileadmin/documents/Publications/Report_2008/Global_ Wind_2008_Report.pdf
2. Snyder B., and Kaiser M.J. Ecological and economic cost-benefit analysis of offshore wind energy. Renewable Energy 34 (2009) 1567-1578
3. Henderson A.R., Morgan C., Smith B., Sorensen H.C., Barthelmie R.J., and Boesmans B. Offshore wind energy in Europe - a review of the state-of-the-art. Wind Energy 6 (2003) 35-52
4. Talisman Energy. Beatrice wind farm demonstrator project. Available from: (2006). http://www.beatricewind.co.uk/Uploads/Downloads/BEATRICE_WINDFARM.pdf [accessed 24.01.07]
5. Dhanju A., Whitaker P., and Kempton W. Assessing offshore wind resources: an accessible methodology. Renew Energy 33 (2008) 55-64
6. Musial W., and Butterfield S. Future for offshore wind energy in the United States. Proc. of EnergyOcean 2004 (2004). http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy04osti/36313.pdf Available from:
7. Sørensen B. A new method for estimating off-shore wind potentials. International Journal of Green Energy 5 (2008) 139-147
8. Pimenta F., Kempton W., and Garvine R. Combining meteorological stations and satellite data to evaluate the offshore wind power resource of Southeastern Brazil. Renewable Energy 33 (2008) 2375-2387
9. Jet Propulsion Laboratory. Available from:. QuikSCAT science data product user's manual, D-18053-Rev A (2006). ftp://podaac.jpl.nasa.gov/ocean_wind/quikscat/L2B12/doc/QSUG_v3.pdf Available from:
10. Archer C.L., and Jacobson M.Z. Spatial and temporal distributions of U.S. winds and wind power at 80 m derived from measurements. Journal of Geophysical Research 108 (2003) 4289
11. Beran J., Claveri L., Lange B., and von Bremen L. Offshore wind modelling and forecast. Proc. of the 6th WRF/15th MM5 users' workshop (2005). http://www.mmm.ucar.edu/wrf/users/workshops/WS2005/abstracts/Session3/30 -Beran.pdf Available from:
12. Jimenez B., Durante F., Lange B., Kreutzer T., and Tambke J. Offshore wind resource assessment with WAsP and MM5: comparative study for the German Bight. Wind Energy 10 (2007) 121-134
13. Dorman C., and Winant C. Buoy observations of the atmosphere along the west coast of the United States, 1981-1990. Journal of Geophysical Research 100 (1995) 16029
14. Archer C.L., Jacobson M.Z., and Ludwig F.L. The Santa Cruz eddy. Part I: observations and statistics. Monthly Weather Review 133 (2005) 767
15. Haack T., Burk S.D., and Hodur R.M. U.S. west coast surface heat fluxes, wind stress, and wind stress curl from a mesoscale model. Monthly Weather Review 133 (2005) 3202-3216
16. Halliwell G.R. The large-scale coastal wind field along the west coast of North America 1981-1982. Journal of Geophysical Research 92 (1987) 1861
17. Beardsley R.C. Local atmospheric forcing during the coastal ocean dynamics experiment 1. A description of the marine boundary layer and atmospheric conditions over a northern California upwelling region. Journal of Geophysical Research 92 (1987) 1467
18. Taylor S.V., Cayan D.R., Graham N.E., and Georgakakos K.P. Northerly surface winds over the eastern North Pacific Ocean in spring and summer. Journal of Geophysical Research 113 (2008) D02110
19. Ralph F.M., Neiman P.J., Persson P.O.G., Bane J.M., Cancillo M.L., Wilczak J.M., et al. Kelvin waves and internal bores in the marine boundary layer inversion and their relationship to coastally trapped wind reversals. Monthly Weather Review 128 (2000) 283-300
20. Jiang Q., Doyle J.D., Haack T., Dvorak M.J., Archer C.L., and Jacobson M.Z. Exploring wind energy potential off the California coast. Geophysical Research Letters 35 (2008) L20819
21. Liu W.T., Tang W., and Xie X. Wind power distribution over the ocean. Geophysical Research Letters 35 (2008)
22. National Oceanographic and Atmospheric Administration, and National Geophysical Data Center. National geophysical data center coastal relief model, 3-arc second. Available from: (2000). http://www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/coastal/coastal.html
23. Grell GA, Dudhia J, Stauffer DR. A description of the fifth-generation Penn State/NCAR mesoscale model (MM5); 1994. p. 117.
24. Fripp M, Wiser R. Analyzing the effects of temporal wind patterns on the value of wind-generated electricity at different sites in California and the Northwest, LBNL-60152; 2006.
25. National Center for Environmental Prediction. NCEP global tropospheric analyses, 1 × 1, daily 15 Sep 1999-present (ds083.2); 2007.
26. National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, National Data Buoy Center; 2008.
27. Masters G.M. Renewable and efficient electric power systems (2004), John Wiley & Sons, Hoboken, NJ
28. Pielke Sr. R.A. Mesoscale meteorological modeling (2002), Academic Press, San Diego
29. Keyser D., and Anthes R.A. The applicability of a mixed-layer model of the planetary boundary layer to real-data forecasting. Monthly Weather Review 105 (1977) 1351-1371
30. Winant C.D., Dorman C.E., Friehe C.A., and Beardsley R.C. The marine layer off Northern California: an example of supercritical channel flow. Journal of the Atmospheric Sciences 45 (1988) 3588-3605
31. Gilliam H. Weather of the San Francisco Bay region (2002), University of California Press, Berkeley
32. Elliot D., and Schwartz M. Development and validation of high-resolution state wind resource maps for the United States. NREL/TP-500-38127. Available from: (2005). http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy05osti/38127.pdf
33. REpower Sytems AG. REpower systems AG: 5 M goes offshore: the countdown is running. Available from: (2007). http://www.repower.de/index.php?id=369&L=1 [accessed 15.06.07]
34. 2 reductions via offshore wind power matched to inherent storage in energy end-uses. Geophysical Research Letters 34 (2007) 2817
35. Archer C.L., and Jacobson M.Z. Evaluation of global wind power. Journal of Geophysical Research 110 (2005) 1
36. Yue C., and Yang M. Exploring the potential of wind energy for a coastal state. Energy Policy 37 (2009) 3925-3940
37. Federal Emergency Management Agency. Transmission lines for conterminous United States (115 kV and above). Distributed by the National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Available from: (1993). http://www.nrel.gov/gis/data_analysis.html
38. U.S. Geological Survey. Urban areas of the United States. Available from: (2001). http://nationalatlas.gov/mld/urbanap.html
39. California Energy Commission. 2006 Net system power report. Available from: (2007). http://www.energy.ca.gov/2007publications/CEC-300-2007-007/CEC-300-2007- 007.PDF [accessed 22.10.09]
40. Price H., and Cable R. Parabolic trough power for the California competitive market. Available from: (2001). http://www.p2pays.org/ref/18/17978.pdf