Design approaches for active, semi-active and passive control systems based on analysis of characteristics of active control force

Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration

Volumn 8, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 493-506

  Ou, Jinping ^a,b   Li, Hui ^b  

^a DALIAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

^b HARBIN INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (China)

Author keywords

Active control; Damping; Design approach; Semi active control; Smart control

Indexed keywords

BENCHMARKING; CONTROL SYSTEM ANALYSIS; DESIGN;

ACTIVE CONTROL; DESIGN APPROACHES; ELASTIC RESTORING FORCES; LINEAR QUADRATIC REGULATOR; OPTIMIZATION OF PARAMETERS; SEMI-ACTIVE CONTROL DEVICES; SEMIACTIVE CONTROL; SMART CONTROL;

DAMPING;

EID: 74549217818     PISSN: 16713664     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11803-009-9119-z     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. Casciati F (2003), Proc., 3rd World Conf. on Structural Control, New York: Wiley.
2. Housner GW et al. (1997). Structural Control: Past, Present and Future,J. Eng. Mech., 123(9): 897-971.
3. Kobori T (2003), Past, Present and Future in Seismic Response Control in Civil Engineering Structures, Proc., 3rd World Conf. on Structural Control, 9-14. New York: Wiley.
4. Kobori T, Koshika N, Yamada N and Ikeda Y (1991), Seismic Response Controlled Structure with Active Mass Driver System. Part 1: Design, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 20: 133-139.
5. Kurata N, Kobori T, Takahashi M, Ishibashi T, Niwa J, Tagami J and Midorikawa H (2000), Forced Vibration Test of a Building with Semi-active Damper System,' Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 29: 629-645.
6. Kurata N, Kobori T, Takahashi M, Niwa N and Midorikawa H (1999), Actual Seismic Response Controlled Building with Semi-active Damper System, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 28: 1427-1447.
7. Li H, Ou JP, Liu M and Guan XC (2004), Design and Implementation of Semi-active MR Damper Control Systems for Stay Cables of Binzhou Yellow River Highway Bridge in China, Proc International Symposium on Network and Center-based Research for Smart Structures Technologies and Earthquake Engineering, Japan: Osaka, pp. 311-316.
8. Ni YQ, Ko JM, Chen ZQ and Spencer BF Jr (2002), Lesson Learned from Application of Semi-active MR Dampers to Bridges Cables for Wind-rain-induced Vibration Control, Proc. China-Japan Workshop on Vibration Control and Health Monitoring of Structures, Shanghai, China (CD-ROM).
9. Nishitani A and Inoue Y (2001), Overview of the Application of Active/semi-active Control to Building Structures in Japan, Earthquake Eng. Struct. Dyn., 30: 1565-1574.
10. Ohtori Y, Christenson RE, Spencer BF Jr and Dyke SJ (2003), Benchmark Control Problems for Seismically Excited Nonlinear Buildings, J Eng Mech: Special Issue on Benchmark Problems.
11. Ou JP (2003), Structural Vibration Control-Active, Semi-active and Smart Control, Beijing: Press of Science, China. (in Chinese).
12. Ou JP, He Z, Wu B and Long X (2000), Damage Performance-based Design of Passively Controlled RC Structures,J. Bldg Struct, 21(1): 63-70. (in Chinese).
13. Patten WN, Sack R and He Q (1996), Controlled Semi-active Hydraulic Vibration Absorber for Bridges, J. Struct. Eng., 122(2): 187-192.
14. Soong TT (1990), Active Structural Control: Theory and Practice, Essex Co: Longman Scientific.
15. Soong TT and Reinhorn AM (1993), An Overview of Active and Hybrid Structural Control Research in the U. S., Struct. Des. Tall Build., 2: 192-209.
16. Spencer BF Jr (2003), State of the Art of Structural Control, J. Strucl Eng, 129(7): 845-856.
17. Symans MD and Constantinou MC (1999), Semi-active Control Systems for Seismic Protection of Structures: A State-of-the-art Review, Engineering Structures, 21: 469-487.
18. Yang JN, Agrawal AK, Samali B and Wu JC (2004), Benchmark Problem for Response Control of Wind-excited Tall Buildings, J Eng Mech, 130(4): 437-446.