On media monitoring - The Media for Democracy Monitor (MDM)

Communications

Volumn 34, Issue 2, 2009, Pages 169-201

  Trappel, Josef ^a,b   Maniglio, Tanja ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIENNA   (Austria)

^b UNIVERSITY OF ZURICH   (Switzerland)

Author keywords

Democracy; Mass media; Media monitoring

Indexed keywords

EID: 74549208163     PISSN: 03412059     EISSN: 16134087     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/COMM.2009.012     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Baker, C. E. (2006). Journalist Performance, Media Policy, and Democracy. In F. Marcinkowski, W. A. Meier, and Trappel, J. (Eds.), Media and democracy. Experiences from Europe (pp. 115-126). Berne: Haupt
2. Becker, L. B., Vlad, T., and Nusser, N. (2007). An evaluation of press freedom indicators. International Communication Gazette, 69, 5-28
3. Bruck, P. A. and Raboy, M. (1989). The challenge of democratic communication. In P. A. Bruck. and M. Raboy (Eds.), Communication for and against Democracy (pp. 3-16). Montréal: Black Rose
4. Bühlmann, M., Merkel, W., and Wessels, B. (2007). Quality of democracy: Democracy barometer for established democracies. Zurich, Berlin. Working Paper of the NCCR-Democracy, No. 10. Retrieved October 30, 2007, from http://www. nccr-democracy.uzh.ch/nccr/publications/workingpaper/pdf/WP10.pdf
5. rd ed., pp. 120-154). London: Arnold
6. Dahl, R. A. (2006). On political equality. New Haven, London: Yale University Press
7. Dahlgren, P. (2001). The public sphere and the Net: Structure, space, and communication. In W. L. Bennett and R. M. Entman, (Eds.), Mediated politics. Communication in the future of democracy (pp. 33-55). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
8. Deutsch Karlekar, K. (2006). Press freedom in 2005. Retrieved June 29, 2007 from http://www.freedomhouse.org/template.cfm?page=131&year= 2006&essay=26
9. Diamond, L. and Morlino, L. (2004). The quality of democracy. Stanford. Working Paper of the Center on Democracy, Development, and the Rule of Law (CDDRL). Stanford Institute on International Studies, No. 20. Retrieved October 30, 2007 from http://iis-db.stanford.edu/pubs/20729/Diamond-Morlino.QoD. intro(book).drft1.pdf
10. Elster, J. (1998). Deliberative democracy. New York: Cambridge University Press
11. Fenske, H., Mertens D., Reinhard W., and Rosen, K. (1994). Geschichte der politischen Ideen: Von Homer bis zur Gegenwart. Frankfurt a. M.: Fischer
12. Gutmann, A. and Thomson, D. (1996). Democracy and Disagreement: Why moral conflict cannot be avoided in politics, and what should be done about it. Harvard: Belknap
13. Habermas, J. (1992). Drei normative Modelle der Demokratie: Zum Begriff deliberativer Demokratie. In H. Münkler (Ed.), Die Chancen der Freiheit. Grundprobleme der Demokratie (pp. 11-24). Munich, Zurich: Piper
14. [Reprinted in: Habermas, J. (1996). Die Einbeziehung des Anderen. Frankfurt a. M.: Suhrkamp, pp. 277-292.]
15. Hallin, D. C. and Mancini, P. (2004). Comparing media systems: Three models of media and politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
16. rd ed.). Cambridge: Polity Press
17. Hutchins Commission (1947). A free And responsible press. Chicago: University of Chicago Press
18. Kelley, D. and Donway, R. (1990). Liberalism and free speech. In J. Lichtenstein (Ed.), Democracy and the mass media (pp. 66-110). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
19. Lauth, H.-J. (2004). Demokratie und Demokratiemessung: Eine konzeptionelle Grundlage für den interkulturellen Vergleich. Wiesbaden: VS
20. McQuail, D. (1992). Media performance: Mass communication and the public interest. London: Sage Publications
21. McQuail, D. (1999). On evaluating media performance in the public interest: Past and future of the research tradition. In K. Nordenstreng and M. Griffin (Eds.), International media monitoring (pp. 25-38). Cresskill, NJ: Hampton Press
22. rd ed.). London: Sage
23. th ed.). London: Sage
24. McQuail, D., and Siune, K. (Eds.). (1998). Media policy: Convergence, concentration and commerce. London: Sage
25. Merritt, D. (1998). Public journalism and public life - Why telling the news is not enough. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates
26. Nerone, J. C. (1995). Last rights: Revisiting four theories of the press. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
27. Nordensteng, K. (2001). Media and democracy: Do we know what to do? Television and New Media, 2, 57-63
28. Nordenstreng, K. (2006). 'Four Theories of the Press' reconsidered. In N. Carpentier, P. Pruulmann-Vengerfeldt, K. Nordenstreng, M. Hartmann, P. Vihalemm, and B. Cammaerts (Eds.), Researching media, democracy and participation: The intellectual work of the 2006 European Media and Communication Doctoral Summer School (pp. 35-45). Tartu: Tartu University Press
29. Norris, P. (2000). A virtuous circle: Political communications in postindustrial societies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
30. PEJ (2007). About us. Retrieved July 24, 2007 from http://www.journalism. org/about-pej/about-us
31. Picard, R. G. (1985). The press and the decline of democracy: The democratic socialist response in public policy. Westport, CT: Greenwood Press
32. Raboy, M., and Bruck, P. A. (Eds.). (1989). Communication for and against democracy. Montreal: Black Rose Books
33. Sarcinelli, Ulrich (1995). Kommunikationstheorien der Politik. In D. Nohlen and R.-O. Schulze (Eds.), Politische Theorien: Lexikon der Politik (Vol. 1, pp. 241-248). Munich: Beck
34. Schudson, M. (1996). The power of news. Cambridge, MA, London: Harvard University Press
35. Schudson, M. (2003). The sociology of news. New York: Norton
36. Schmidt, M. G. (2000). Demokratietheorien. Opladen: Leske and Budrich
37. Schulz, W. (2000, October). Preconditions of journalistic quality in an open society. Paper presented at the International Conference News Media and Politics - Independent Journalism, Budapest
38. Siebert, F., Peterson, T., and Schramm, W. (1956). Four theories of the press: The authoritarian, libertarian, social responsibility and soviet communist concepts of what the press should be and do. Urbana: University of Illinois Press
39. Strömbäck, J. (2005). In search of a standard: Four models of democracy and their normative implications for journalism. Journalism Studies, 6(3), 331-345
40. Trappel, J., and Maniglio, T. (2009). Media for Democracy Monitor. NCCR Research Report. Zurich
41. Voltmer, K. (1999). Medienqualität und Demokratie: Eine empirische Analyse publizistischer Informations- und Orientierungsleistungen in der Wahlkampfkommunikation. Baden-Baden: Nomos Universitätsschriften, Politik
42. Voltmer, K. (2000). Structure of diversity of press and broadcasting systems: The institutional context of public communications in western democracies. WZB Discussion Paper FS III 00-201, Berlin
43. Webster, F. (1999). Knowledgeability and democracy in an information age. Annual Ameritech Information Society Lecture. Edinburgh: Merchiston Publishing
44. Westerstahl, J. (1983). Objective news reporting: General premises. Communication Research, 10(3), 403-424
45. Whitehouse, M. (2006). Measuring change in media systems: The media sustainability index. In M. Harvey (Ed.), Perspectives on advancing governance and development from the global forum for media development (pp. 76-80). Beijing