Analytical validation of serum bone alkaline phosphatase (BAP OSTASE) on Liaison

Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine

Volumn 48, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 67-72

  Cavalier, Etienne ^a   Rozet, Eric ^b,c   Carlisi, Agnès ^a   Bekaert, Anne Catherine ^a   Rousselle, Olivier ^a   Hubert, Philippe ^b   Chapelle, Jean Paul ^a   Delanaye, Pierre ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^b UNIVERSITY OF LIÈGE   (Belgium)

^c FRS FNRS Postdoctoral Researcher ^*  (Belgium)

Author keywords

Analytical validation; Bone alkaline phosphatase; Measurement uncertainty; Reference range

Indexed keywords

ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE BONE ISOENZYME; CALCIUM; PARATHYROID HORMONE; PHOSPHORUS; VITAMIN D;

ACCURACY; ADOLESCENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CHILD; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; GLOMERULUS FILTRATION RATE; GROUPS BY AGE; HUMAN; INFANT; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; MENOPAUSE; POPULATION; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; REFERENCE VALUE; SCHOOL CHILD; SENSITIVITY ANALYSIS; SEX DIFFERENCE; VALIDATION STUDY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ALKALINE PHOSPHATASE; CHILD; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; FEMALE; HUMANS; IMMUNOASSAY; INFANT; INFANT, NEWBORN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REFERENCE VALUES; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; UNCERTAINTY;

EID: 74549204462     PISSN: 14346621     EISSN: 14374331     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1515/CCLM.2010.019     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Robinson R. The possible significance of hexosephosphoric esters in ossification. Biochem J 1923;17:286-293
2. Raymond F, Datta H, Moss D. Alkaline phosphatase isoforms in bile and serum and their generation from cells in vitro. Biochim Biophys Acta 1991;1074:217-222
3. Posen S, Grunstein HS. Turnover rate of skeletal alkaline phosphatase in humans. Clin Chem 1982;28:153-154
4. Puche RC, Caferra DA, Rosillo I. Bone isoenzyme of serum alkaline phosphatase measured with wheat-germ agglutinin. Clin Chem 1988;34:1372-1374
5. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (formerly NCCLS). Evaluation of precision performance of quantitative measurement methods; approved guideline, 2nd ed. CLSI document EP5-A2. Wayne, PA, 2004.
6. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (formerly NCCLS). Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative measurement procedures: a statistical approach; approved guideline; CLSI document EP6-A. Wayne, PA, 2003:23(16).
7. Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (formerly NCCLS). Evaluation of the linearity of quantitative analytical methods; proposed guideline. CLSI document. Wayne, PA, 1986.
8. EURACHEM/CITAC Guide CG 4. Quantifying uncertainty in analytical measurement, 2nd ed. 2000.
9. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO/DTS 21748 Guide to the use of repeatability, reproducibility and trueness estimates in measurement uncertainty estimation. Geneva, 2003.
10. International Organization for Standardization (ISO). ISO 5725-5731 Application of the statistics-accuracy (trueness and precision) of the results and methods of measurement-Part 1: general principles and definitions. Geneva, 1994.
11. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1986;1:307-310
12. Beck-Jensen JE, Kollerup G, Sorensen HA, Pors NS, Sorensen OH. A single measurement of biochemical markers of bone turnover has limited utility in the individual person. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 1997;57:351-359
13. Cavalier E, Delanaye P. Defining a "reference population": no easy task. J Bone Miner Res 2009.
14. Glover S, Gall M, Schoenborn-Kellenberger O, Wagener M, Garnero P, Boonen S, et al. Establishing a reference interval for bone turnover markers in 637 healthy, young, pre-menopausal women from UK, France, Belgium and the USA. J Bone Miner Res 2008.