Evaluating nested clade phylogeographic analysis under models of restricted gene flow

Systematic Biology

Volumn 59, Issue 4, 2010, Pages 415-432

  Panchal, Mahesh ^a,b   Beaumont, Mark A ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF READING   (United Kingdom)

^b MAX PLANCK INSTITUTE FOR EVOLUTIONARY BIOLOGY   (Germany)

Author keywords

Nested clade analysis; Phylogeography; Restricted gene flow; Simulation

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; BIOLOGICAL MODEL; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMOGRAPHY; GENE FLOW; PHYLOGENY;

ANIMALS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; DEMOGRAPHY; GENE FLOW; MODELS, GENETIC; PHYLOGENY;

EID: 74549194955     PISSN: 10635157     EISSN: 1076836X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syq022     Document Type: Article

References (53)

1. Bandelt H.J., Forster P., Rohl A. 1999. Median-joining networks for inferring intraspecifc phylogenies. Mol. Biol. Evol. 16:37-48.
2. Beaumont M.A., Balding D. 2004. Identifying adaptive genetic divergence among populations from genome scans. Mol. Ecol. 13: 969-980.
3. Beaumont M.A., Nichols R.A. 1996. Evaluating loci for use in the genetic analysis of population structure. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B, Biol. Sci. 263:1619-1626.
4. Beaumont M.A., Nielsen R., Robert C., Hey J., Gaggiotti O., Knowles L.L., Estoup A., Panchal M., Corander J., Hickerson M., Sisson S.A., Fagundes N., Chikhi L., Beerli P., Vitalis R., Cornuet J.-M., Huelsenbeck J., Foll M., Yang Z., Rousset F., Balding D., Excoffer L. 2010. In defense of model-based inference in phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 19:436-446.
5. Beaumont M.A., Panchal M. 2008. On the validity of nested clade phy-logeographical analysis. Mol. Ecol. 17:2563-2565.
6. Brisson J.A., de Toni D.C., Duncan I., Templeton A.R. 2005. Abdominal pigmentation Variation in Drosophila Polymorpha: geographic variation in the trait, and underlying phylogeography. Evolution. 59:1046-1059.
7. Carstens B.C., Knowles L.L. 2007. Estimating species phylogeny from gene-tree probabilities despite incomplete lineage sorting: an example from Melanoplus grasshoppers. Syst. Biol. 56:400-411.
8. Clement M., Posada D., Crandall K.A. 2000. TCS: a computer program to estimate gene genealogies. Mol. Ecol. 9:1657-1659.
9. Crandall K.A. 1996. Multiple interspecies transmissions of human and simian T-cell leukemia/lymphoma virus type I sequences. Mol. Biol. Evol. 13:115-131.
10. Crow J.F., Aoki K. 1984. Group selection for a polygenic behaviourial trait: estimating the degree of population subdivision. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 81:6073-6077.
11. De A., Durrett R. 2007. Stepping-stone spatial structure causes slow decay of linkage disequilibrium and shifts the site frequency spectrum. Genetics. 176:969-981.
12. Excoffer L., Laval G., Schneider S. 2005. Arlequin ver. 3.0: an integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol. Bioinform. Online. 1:47-50.
13. Excoffer L., Novembre J., Schneider S. 2000. SIMCOAL: a general coalescent program for the simulation of molecular data in interconnected populations with arbitrary demography. J. Hered. 91:506-509.
14. Fagundes N.J.R., Ray N., Beaumont M.A., Neuenschwander S., Salzano F.M., Bonatto S.L., Excoffer L. 2007. Statistical evaluation of alternative models of human evolution. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 104:17614-17619.
15. Fu Y.-X. 1997. Statistical tests of neutrality of mutations against population growth, hitchhiking, and background selection. Genetics. 147:915-925.
16. Garrick R.C., Nason J.D., Meadows C.A., Dyer R.J. 2009. Not just vi-cariance: phylogeography of a Sonoran desert euphorb indicates a major role of range expansion along the Baja peninsula. Mol. Ecol. 18:1916-1931.
17. Jennings W., Edwards S. 2005. Speciational history of australian grass fnches (Poephila) inferred from thirty gene trees. Evolution. 59:2033-2047.
18. Kimura M., Weiss G. 1964. The stepping stone model of population structure and the decrease of genetic correlation with distance. Genetics. 49:561-576.
19. Knowles L.L. 2008. Why does a method that fails continue to be used? Evolution. 62:2713-2717.
20. Knowles L.L. 2009. Statistical phylogeography. Annu. Rev. Ecol. Syst. 40:593-612.
21. Knowles L.L., Maddison W.P. 2002. Statistical phylogeography. Mol. Ecol. 11:2623-2635.
22. Nielsen R., Beaumont M.A. 2009. Statistical inferences in phylogeog-raphy. Mol. Ecol. 18:1034-1047.
23. Palsboll P.J., Berube M., Aguilar A., Notarbartolo-Di-Sciara G., Nielsen R. 2004. Discerning between recurrent gene fow and recent divergence under a fnite-site mutation model applied to north atlantic and mediterranean sea fn whale (balaenoptera physalus) populations. Evolution. 58:670-675.
24. Panchal M. 2007. The automation of nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Bioinformatics. 23:509-510.
25. Panchal M., Beaumont M.A. 2007. The automation and evaluation of nested clade phylogeographic analysis. Evolution. 61:1466-1480. (Pubitemid 46848836)
26. Pesole G., Gissi C., De Chirico A., Saccone C. 1999. Nucleotide substitution rate of mammalian mitochondrial genomes. J. Mol. Evol. 48:427-434.
27. Petit R.J. 2008. The coup de grâce for the nested clade phylogeographic analysis? Mol. Ecol. 17:516-518.
28. Petit R.J., Grivet D. 2002. Optimal randomization strategies when testing the existence of a phylogeographic structure. Genetics. 161:469-471.
29. Posada D., Crandall K.A., Templeton A.R. 2000. GeoDis: a program for the cladistic nested analysis of the geographical distribution of genetic haplotypes. Mol. Ecol. 9:487-488.
30. Posada D., Crandall K.A., Templeton A. R. 2006. Nested clade analysis statistics. Mol. Ecol. Notes. 6:590-593.
31. Pulquério M. J.F. 2005. Evaluation of nested clade phylogeograph-ical analysis using simulated DNA sequence data with different population structures and histories [master's thesis]. Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon.
32. Rannala B., Bertorelle G. 2001. Using linked markers to infer the age of a mutation. Hum. Mutat. 18:87-100.
33. Rannala B., Yang Z. 2003. Bayes estimation of species divergence times and ancestral population sizes using DNA sequences from multiple loci. Genetics. 164:1645-1656.
34. Ray N., Currat M., Excoffer L. 2003. Intra-deme molecular diversity in spatially expanding populations. Mol. Biol. Evol. 20:76-86.
35. Ripplinger J., Sullivan J. 2008. Does choice in model selection affect maximum likelihood analysis? Syst. Biol. 57:76-85.
36. Rousset F. 2003. Inferences from spatial population genetics. In: Balding D. J., Bishop M., Cannings C., editors. Handbook of statistical genetics. 2nd ed. Vol.2. Chichester (UK): John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
37. Skarpaas O., Shea K., Bullock J.M. 2005. Optimizing dispersal study design by monte carlo simulation. J. Appl. Ecol. 42:731-739.
38. Takahata N., Lee S.-H., Satta Y. 2001. Testing multiregionality of modern human origins. Mol. Biol. Evol. 18:172-183.
39. Tavare S., Balding D.J., Griffths R.C., Donnelly P. 1997. Inferring coalescence times from DNA sequence data. Genetics. 145:505-518.
40. Templeton A.R. 1998. Nested clade analyses of phylogeographic data: testing hypotheses about gene fow and population history. Mol. Ecol. 7:381-397.
41. Templeton A.R. 2002. Out of Africa again and again. Nature. 416: 45-51.
42. Templeton A.R. 2004a. A maximum likelihood framework for cross validation of phylogeographic hypotheses. In: Wasser S. P., editor. Evolutionary theory and processes: modern horizons. Dordrecht (The Netherlands): Kluwer Academic. p. 209-230.
43. Templeton A.R. 2004b. Statistical phylogeography: methods of evaluating and minimizing inference errors. Mol. Ecol. 13:789-809.
44. Templeton A.R. 2005. Haplotype trees and modern human origins. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol. 48:33-59.
45. Templeton A.R. 2008. Nested clade analysis: an extensively validated method for strong phylogeographic inference. Mol. Ecol. 17:1877-1880.
46. Templeton A.R. 2009a. Statistical hypothesis testing in intraspecifc phylogeography: nested clade phylogeographical analysis vs. approximate Bayesian computation. Mol. Ecol. 18:319-331.
47. Templeton A.R. 2009b. Why does a method that fails continue to be used: the answer. Evolution. 63:807-812.
48. Templeton A.R., Crandall K.A., Sing C.F. 1992. A cladistic analysis of phenotypic associations with haplotypes inferred from restriction endonuclease mapping and DNA sequence data.3. Cladogram estimation. Genetics. 132:619-633.
49. Templeton A.R., Routman E., Phillips C.A. 1995. Separating population structure from population history: a cladistic analysis of the geographical distribution of mitochondrial DNA haplotypes in the Tiger Salamander, Ambystoma tigrinum. Genetics. 140:767-782.
50. Williamson S., Hernandez R., Fledel-Alon A., Zhu L., Nielsen R., Bustamante C. 2005. Simultaneous inference of selection and population growth from patterns of variation in the human genome. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 102:7882.
51. Wiuf C. 2003. Inferring population history from genealogical trees. Zool. Sci. 46:241-264.
52. Woods K.S., Davis M.B. 1989. Paleoecology of range limits: beech in the upper peninsula of Michigan. Ecology. 70:681-696.
53. Wright S. 1931. Evolution in Mendelian populations. Genetics. 16:97-159.