Software product line testing - A systematic review

ICSOFT 2009 - 4th International Conference on Software and Data Technologies, Proceedings

Volumn 1, Issue , 2009, Pages 23-30

  Lamancha, Beatriz Pérez ^a   Usaola, Macario Polo ^b   Velthius, Mario Piattini ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE LA REPÚBLICA   (Uruguay)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CASTILLA LA MANCHA   (Spain)

Author keywords

Software product line; Systematic review; Testing

Indexed keywords

BEST PRACTICE; INDUSTRIAL PRODUCTION; INNOVATIVE RESEARCH; SOFTWARE DEVELOPMENT; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING METHODS; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE; STATE OF THE ART; SYSTEMATIC REVIEW;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE MAINTENANCE; COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; RESEARCH; SOFTWARE DESIGN; SOFTWARE TESTING;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE REUSABILITY;

EID: 74549172117     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (34)

1. Ajila, S. and Dumitrescu, R. (2007). Experimental use of code delta, code churn, and rate of change to understand software product line evolution. The Journal of Systems and Software, 80(1):74-91.
2. Ardis, M., Daley, N., Hoffman, D., Siy, H., and Weiss, D. (2000). Software product lines: a case study. Software Practice and Experience, 30(7):825-847.
3. Baerisch, S. (2007). Model-driven test-case construction. Foundations of Software Engineering, pages 587-590.
4. Bertolino, A. (2007). Software testing research: Achievements, challenges, dreams. In Internation Conference on Software Engineering, pages 85-103. IEEE Computer Society.
5. Bertolino, A., Gnesi, S., and di Pisa, A. (2004). Pluto: A test methodology for product families. Software Product-family Engineering: 5th International Workshop, PFE 2003, Siena, Italy, November 4-6, 2003: Revised Papers.
6. Biolchini, J., Mian, P., Natali, A., and Travassos, G. (2005). Systematic review in software engineering. System Engineering and Computer Science Department COPPE/UFRJ, Technical Report ES, 679(05).
7. Clements, P. and Northrop, L. (2007). A framework for software product line practice, version 5.0.
8. Clements, P. C. and Northrop, L. M. (2002). Salion, inc.: A software product line case study. Technical Report CMU/SEI-2002-TR-038.
9. Cohen, M., Dwyer, M., and Shi, J. (2006). Coverage and adequacy in software product line testing. Proceedings of the ISSTA 2006 workshop on Role of software architecture for testing and analysis, pages 53-63.
10. Denger, C. and Kolb, R. (2006). Testing and inspecting reusable product line components: first empirical results. Proceedings of the 2006 ACM/IEEE international symposium on International symposium on empirical software engineering, pages 184-193.
11. Dueñas, J., Mellado, J., Cern, J., Arciniegas, J., Ruiz, J., and Capilla, R. (2004). Model driven testing in product family context. Technical Report ISSN 1381 - 3625, University of Twente.
12. Geppert, B., Li, J., RoBler, F., and Weiss, D. (2004). Towards generating acceptance tests for product lines. Software Reuse: 8th International Conference, ICSR 2004, Madrid, Spain, July 5-9, 2004: Proceedings.
13. Kang, S., Lee, J., Kim, M., and Lee, W. (2007). Towards a formal framework for product line test development. Computer and Information Technology, 2007. CIT 2007. 7th IEEE International Conference on, pages 921-926.
14. Kauppinen, R., Taina, J., and Tevanlinna, A. (2004). Hook and template coverage criteria for testing framework-based software product families. Proceedings of the International Workshop on Software Product Line Testing, pages 7-12.
15. Kim, K., Kim, H., Ahn, M., Seo, M., Chang, Y., and Kang, K. (2006). Asadal: a tool system for co-development of software and test environment based on product line engineering. International Conference on Software Engineering, pages 783-786.
16. Kishi, T. and Noda, N. (2006). Formal verification and software product lines. Communications of the ACM, 49(12):73-77.
17. Kitchenham, B. (2004). Procedures for performing systematic reviews. Keele University, UK, Technical Report TR/SE-0401-ISSN, pages 1353-7776.
18. Kolb, R. and Muthig, D. (2006). Making testing product lines more efficient by improving the testability of product line architectures. Proceedings of the ISSTA 2006 workshop on Role of software architecture for testing and analysis, pages 22-27.
19. Krueger, C. (2006). The emerging practice of software product line development. Military Embedded Systems, (2nd semester):34-36.
20. McGregor, J. (2001). Testing a Software Product Line. Carnegie Mellon University, Software Engineering Institute.
21. McGregor, J., Northrop, L., Jarrad, S., and K, K. P. (2002). Initiating software product lines. IEEE Software, 19(4):24-27.
22. Nebut, C., Fleurey, F., Le Traon, Y., Jezequel, J., and de Beaulieu, C. (2004). A requirement-based approach to test product families. Software Product-family Engineering: 5th International Workshop, PFE 2003, Siena, Italy, November 4-6, 2003: Revised Papers.
23. Nebut, C., Pickin, S., Le Traon, Y., and Jezequel, J. (2003). Automated requirements-based generation of test cases for product families. Automated Software Engineering, 2003. Proceedings. 18th IEEE International Conference on, pages 263-266.
24. Olimpiew, E. and Gomaa, H. (2005). Model-based testing for applications derived from software product lines. Proceedings of the 2005 workshop on Advances in model-based testing, pages 1-7.
25. OMG (2008). Meta object facility (mof) 2.0 query/view/transformation, v1.0. Technical Report formal/2008-04-03.
26. Pesonen, J., Katara, M., and Mikkonen, T. (2006). Production-testing of embedded systems with aspects. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 3875:90.
27. Pino, F., Garcia, F., and Piattini, M. (2007). Software process improvement in small and medium software enterprises: A systematic review. Software Quality Journal.
28. Pohl, K., Bckle, G., and van der Linden, F. (2005). Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles, and Techniques. Springer.
29. Pohl, K. and Metzger, A. (2006). Software product line testing. Communications of the ACM, 49(12):78-81.
30. Reuys, A., Kamsties, E., Pohl, K., and Reis, S. (2005). Model-based system testing of software product families. Pastor, O.; Falcao e Cunha, J.(Eds.): Advanced Information Systems Engineering, CAiSE, pages 519-534.
31. Tevanlinna, A. (2004). Product family testing with rita. Proceedings of the Eleventh Nordic Workshop on Programming and Software Development Tools and Techniques (NWPER '2004), pages 251-265.
32. Trew, T. (2005). Enabling the smooth integration of core assets: Defining and packaging architectural rules for a family of embedded products. LECTURE NOTES IN COMPUTER SCIENCE, 3714:137.
33. van der Linden, F. (2002). Software product families in europe: the esaps and cafe projects. Software, IEEE, 19(4):41-49. TY-JOUR.
34. White, J. and Schmidt, D. (2006). Fireant: A tool for reducing enterprise product line architecture deployment, configuration, and testing costs. Engineering of Computer Based Systems, 2006. ECBS 2006. 13th Annual IEEE International Symposium and Workshop on, pages 507-508.