Evaluating quality of open source components for reuse-intensive commercial solutions

Conference Proceedings of the EUROMICRO

Volumn , Issue , 2009, Pages 11-19

  Rudzki, Jakub ^a   Kiviluoma, Kimmo ^a   Poikonen, Tero ^a   Oy, Solita ^a   Hammouda, Imed ^b  

^a Tampere University of Technology ^*  (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Open source; Reuse

Indexed keywords

COMMERCIAL PROJECTS; MULTIPLE SOLUTIONS; OPEN SOURCES; OPEN-SOURCE COMPONENTS; QUALITY CRITERIA; QUALITY EVALUATION; RISK TOLERANCE; SOFTWARE PRODUCT LINE;

COMPUTER SOFTWARE SELECTION AND EVALUATION; NETWORK ARCHITECTURE; SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

QUALITY CONTROL;

EID: 74549163617     PISSN: 10896503     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/SEAA.2009.30     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (29)

1. M. Bolado, J. Castillo, H. Posadas, P. Snchez, E. Villar, C. Snchez, P. Blasco, and H. Fouren, "Using open source cores in real applications," in DCIS, 2003, pp. 683-688, http://www.escet.urjc.es/ jcastillo/paperdcis.pdf.
2. T. R. Madanmohan and R. De', "Open source reuse in commercial firms," IEEE Softw., vol. 21, no. 6, pp. 62-69, 2004.
3. J. Bosch, Design and Use of Software Architectures: Adopting and Evolving a Product-line Approach. New York, NY, USA: ACM Press/Addison-Wesley Publishing Co., 2000.
4. K. Pohl, G. Böckle, and F. J. van der Linden, Software Product Line Engineering: Foundations, Principles and Techniques. Secaucus, NJ, USA: Springer-Verlag New York, Inc., 2005.
5. L. M. Northrop, P. C. Clements, F. Bachmann, J. Bergey, G. Chastek, S. Cohen, P. Donohoe, L. Jones, R. Krut, R. Little, J. McGregor, and L. O'Brien, "A framework for software product line practice, version 5.0," http://www.sei.cmu.edu/productlines/framework.html, July 2007, Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
6. JBoss Inc, "Hibernate," At URL http://www.hibernate.org/.
7. www.springframework.org, "Spring framework," At URL http://www.springframework.org/, 2006.
8. Liferay, "Liferay portal," http://www.liferay.com, July 2008.
9. Alfresco Software, Inc., "Alfresco," At URL http://www.alfresco.com, 2006.
10. L. Zhao and S. Elbaum, "A survey on quality related activities in open source," SIGSOFT Softw. Eng. Notes, vol. 25, no. 3, pp. 54-57, 2000.
11. L. Zhao and S. Elbaum, "Quality assurance under the open source development model," J. Syst. Softw., vol. 66, no. 1, pp. 65-75, 2003.
12. J. Kuan, "Open source software as lead user's make or buy decision: A study of open and closed source quality," in Open Source Software : Economics, Law and Policy. Toulouse, France: The Institut d'Economie Industrielle (IDEI), June 20-21 2002, http://www.idei.fr/activity.php?a=2502.
13. T. Otte, R. Moreton, and H. D. Knoell, "Applied quality assurance methods under the open source development model," 32nd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference, vol. 0, pp. 1247-1252, 2008.
14. I. Stamelos, L. Angelis, A. Oikonomou, and G. L. Bleris, "Code quality analysis in open source software development," Information Systems Journal, vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 43-60, January 2002.
15. S. Comella-Dorda, J. C. Dean, E. J. Morris, and P. A. Oberndorf, "A process for cots software product evaluation," in ICCBSS. London, UK: Springer-Verlag, 2002, pp. 86-96.
16. D. A. Wheeler, "How to evaluate open source software / free software (oss/fs) programs," http://www.dwheeler.com/oss fs eval.html, March 11 2008.
17. A. Origin, "Qsos version 1.6," http://www.qsos.org, 23 October 2006.
18. R. Semeteys, "Method for qualification and selection of open source software," http://www.osbr.ca/ojs/index.php/osbr/article/view/583/540, May 2008, Open Source Business Resource.
19. Navica, "Open Source Maturity Model," http://www.navicasoft. com/pages/osmm.htm, 2004.
20. Capgemini, "Open Source Maturity Model," http://www.osspartner. com/portail/sections/accueilpublic/ evaluation-osmm, 2003.
21. "Business Readiness Rating," http://www.openbrr.org/, 2008.
22. N. Linda, "Software product line adoption roadmap," Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh, Tech. Rep. CMU/SEI-2004-TR-022, ADA431117, 2004.
23. E. Niemelä, "Strategies of product family architecture development," in SPLC, 2005, pp. 186-197.
24. F. Ahmed, L. F. Capretz, and M. A. Babar, "A model of open source software-based product line development," 32nd Annual IEEE International Computer Software and Applications Conference, vol. 0, pp. 1215-1220, 2008.
25. E. Niemelä and A. Immonen, "Capturing quality requirements of product family architecture," Information & Software Technology, vol. 49, no. 11-12, pp. 1107-1120, 2007.
26. S. H. Kan, Metrics and Models in Software Quality Engineering. Boston, MA, USA: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc., 2002.
27. B. Henderson-Sellers, Object-oriented metrics: measures of complexity. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1996.
28. M. Lorenz and J. Kidd, Object-oriented software metrics: a practical guide. Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1994.
29. O. Syd, "Avoimen lähdekoodin prosessikoneiden vertailu (comparison of open source workflow management systems)," Master's thesis, Helsinki University of Technology, September 2008, in Finnish.