Male song repertoire size and syllable sharing of oriental great reed warblers, acrocephalus orientalis

Animal Cells and Systems

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2009, Pages 91-96

  Park, Shi Ryong ^a   Park, Mi Jin ^b   Sung, Ha Cheol ^a  

^a Korea National University of Education   (South Korea)

^b Kyungdug Girls High School   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Acrocephalus orientalis; Female choice; Sexual selection; Song repertoire; Syllable sharing

Indexed keywords

ACROCEPHALUS ARUNDINACEUS; ACROCEPHALUS ORIENTALIS;

EID: 74549158264     PISSN: 19768354     EISSN: 21512485     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/19768354.2009.9647198     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Alatalo, RV, Lundberg, A, and Glynn, C. 1986. Female pied flycatchers choose territory quality and not male characteristics. Nature, 323:152–153.
2. Beecher, MD, Cambell, SE, Burt, JM, Hill, CE, and Nordby, JC. 2000. Song-type matching between neighbouring song sparrows. Anim Behav, 59:21–27.
3. Beecher, MD, and Brenowitz, EA. 2005. Functional aspects of song learning in birds. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 20:143–149.
4. Björkund, M. 1990. Mate choice is not important for female reproductive success in the common rosefinch (Carpodacus erythrinus). Auk, 107:35–44.
5. Buchanan, KL, and Catchpole, CK. 1997. Female choice in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus:multiple cues from song and territory quality. Proc Roy Soc Lond B, 364:521–526.
6. Catchpole, CK. 1980. Sexual selection and the evolution of complex songs among European warblers of the genus Acrocephalus. Behaviour, 74:149–166.
7. Catchpole, CK. 1983. Variation in the song of the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus in relation to mate attraction and territorial defence. Animal Behavior, 31:1217–1225.
8. Catchpole, CK. 1986. Song repertiore and the reproductive success in the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. BehavEcol Sociobiol, 19:439–445.
9. Catchpole, CK, and Slater, PJB. 1995. “ Bird Song ”. In Biological Themes and Variations, Oxford:Cambridge University Press.
10. Dyrcz, A, and Nagata, H. 2002. Breeding ecology of the Eastern Great Reed Warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus orientalis at Lake Kasumigaura, central Japan. Bird Study, 49:166–171.
11. Falls, JB. 1988. Does song deter territorial intrusion in white-throated sparrows (Zonotrichia albicollis)?. Canadian Journal of Zoology, 66:206–211.
12. Forstmeier, W, and Leisler, B. 2004. Repertoire size, sexual selection and offspring viability in the great reed warbler:changing patterns in space and time. Behav Ecol, 15:555–563.
13. Forstmeier, W, Hasselquist, D, Bensch, S, and Leisler, B. 2006. Does song reflect age and viability? A comparison between two populations of the great reed warbler Acrocephalus arundinaceus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol, 59:634–643.
14. Hasselquist, D. 1994. Male attractiveness, mating tactics and realized fitness in the polygynous great reed warbler, University of Lund. Ph.D. thesis
15. Hasselquist, D. 1998. Polygyny in great reed warblers a long term study of factors contributing to male fitness. Ecology, 104:759–769.
16. Hasselquist, D, Bensch, S, and von Schantz, T. 1996. Correlation between male song repertoire, extra-pair paternity and offspring survival in the great reed warbler. Nature Lond, 381:229–232.
17. Howard, RD. 1974. The influence of sexual selection and interspecific competition on mockingbird song (Mimus polyglottos). Evolution, 28:428–438.
18. Kokko, H. 1998. Good genes, old age and life-history trade-offs. EvolEcol, 12:739–750.
19. Krebs, JR, Ashcroft, R, and Webber, MI. 1978. Song repertoires and territory defence. Nature, 271:539–542.
20. Kroodsma, DE. 1974. Song learning, dialects and dispersal in the Bewick's wren. Zeitschrift für Tierpsychologie., 35:352–380.
21. Lee, WS, Gu, TH, and Park, JY. 2000. A field guide to the birds of Korea, Seoul:LG evergreen foundation.
22. Lee, YK. 2002. Patterns of territory settlement and female choice in polygynous Great Reed-Warblers, Acrocephalus arundinaceus, 1–54. Seoul:Kyung Hee University. MS. Thesis
23. Marler, P. 1990. Song learning:the interface between behavior and neuroethology. Proc Roy Soc Lond B, 329:109–114.
24. Marra, PP, and Holberton, RL. 1998. Corticosterone levels as indicators of habitat quality:Effects of habitat segregation in a migratory bird during the nonbreeding season. Oecologia, 116:284–292.
25. McGregor, PK. 1991. The singer and the song:on the receiving end of bird song. BiolRev, 66:57–81.
26. McGregor, PK, Krebs, JR, and Perrins, CM. 1981. Song repertoires and lifetime reproductive success in the great tit (Parus major). Am Nat, 118:149–159.
27. Mantel, M. 1967. The detection of disease clustering and a generalized regression approach. Cancer Res, 27:209–220.
28. Møller, AP, and de Lope, F. 1999. Senescence in a shortlived migratory bird:age-dependent morphology, migration, reproduction and parasitism. Journal of Animal Ecology, 68:163–171.
29. Mundinger, PC. 1982. “ Microgeographic and macrogeographic variation in the acquired vocalizations of birds ”. In Acoustic Communication in Birds, Edited by:Kroodsma, DE, and Miller, EH. Vol 2, 147–208. New York:Academic Press.
30. Nelson, DA, and Marler, P. 1994. Selection-based learning in bird song development. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 91:10498–501.
31. Nicholson, JS, Buchanan, KL, Marshall, RC, and Catchpole, CK. 2007. Song sharing and repertoire size in the sedge warbler, Acrocephalus schoenobaenus:changes within and between years. Animal Behaviour, 74:1585–1592.
32. Nowicki, S, Peters, S, and Podos, J. 1998. Song learning, early nutrition and sexual selection in songbirds. Am Zool, 38:179–190.
33. Nowicki, S, Hasselquist, D, Bensch, S, and Peters, S. 2000. Nestling growth and song repertoire size in great reed warblers:evidence for song learning as an indicator mechanism in mate choice. Proc R Soc Lond Ser B, 267:2419–2424.
34. Park, MJ. 2007. Seasonal and individual variability of song in great reed warbler (Acrocephalus arundinaceus orientalis), 1–41. Chungwon:Korea National University of Education. MEd. Thesis
35. Payne, RB. 1981. Song learning and social interactions in indigo buntings. Anim Behav, 29:688–697.
36. Read, AF, and Weary, DM. 1992. The evolution of bird song:comparative analyses. Phil Trans R Soc LondB, 338:165–187.
37. Searcy, WA, and Andersson, M. 1986. Sexual selection and the evolution of song. Ann Rev Ecol Syst, 17:507–533.
38. Sung, HC, and Handford, P. 2006. Songs of the Savannah Sparrow:structure and geographic variation. Can JZool, 84:1637–1646.
39. Temrin, H. 1986. Singing behaviour in relation to polyterritorial polygyny in the wood warbler (Phylloscopus sibilatrix). Anim Behav, 34:146–157.
40. Tracy, TT, and Baker, MC. 1999. Geographic variation in syllables of House Finch songs. Auk, 116:666–676.
41. Won, PO, and Gore, MEJ. 1971. The birds of Korea 354–355. Taewon, Seoul
42. Yasukawa, K. 1981. Song repertoires in the red-winged blackbird (agelaius phoeniceus):a test of the Beau Geste hypothesis. Anim Behav, 29:114–125.
43. Zar, JH. 1999. Biostatistical Analysis, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey:Prentice Hall.