Non-Invasive, External Ultrasonic Lipolysis

Seminars in Cutaneous Medicine and Surgery

Volumn 28, Issue 4, 2009, Pages 263-267

  Coleman, Kyle M ^a   Coleman III, William P ^b   Benchetrit, Arie ^c  

^a Dermatology   (United States)

^b TULANE UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES CENTER   (United States)

^c Plastic Surgery   (Canada)

Author keywords

non surgical fat reduction; ultrashape

Indexed keywords

DEVICE; HUMAN; LIPOLYSIS; LIPOSUCTION; NON INVASIVE PROCEDURE; PATIENT SATISFACTION; REVIEW; SUBCUTANEOUS FAT; ULTRASOUND;

ADIPOCYTES; COSMETIC TECHNIQUES; HIGH-INTENSITY FOCUSED ULTRASOUND ABLATION; HUMANS;

EID: 74549155126     PISSN: 10855629     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.sder.2009.10.004     Document Type: Review

References (28)

1. Housman T.S., Lawrence N., Mellen B.G., et al. The safety of liposuction: Results of a national survey. Dermatol Surg 28 (2002) 971-978
2. Hanke C.W., Bernstein G., and Bullock S. Safety of tumescent liposuction in 15,336 patients. National survey results. Dermatol Surg 2 (1995) 459-462
3. Klein J.A. Tumescent technique for local anesthesia improves safety in large-volume liposuction. Plast Reconstr Surg 92 (1993) 1085-1098
4. Hanke W., Cox S.E., Kuznets N., et al. Tumescent liposuction report performance measurement initiative: National survey results. Dermatol Surg 30 (2004) 967-977
5. Augustin M., Zschocke I., Sommer B., et al. Sociodemographic profile and satisfaction with treatment of patients undergoing liposuction in tumescent local anesthesia. Dermatol Surg 25 (1999) 480-483
6. Rotunda A.M., and Kolodney M.S. Mesotherapy and phosphatidylcholine injections: Historical clarification and review. Dermatol Surg 32 (2006) 465-480
7. Rotunda A.M., Weiss S.R., and Rivkin L.S. Randomized double-blind clinical trial of subcutaneously injected deoxycholate versus a phosphatidylcholine-deoxycholate combination for the reduction of submental fat. Dermatol Surg 35 (2009) 792-803
8. Gokdemir G., Küçükünal A., and Sakiz D. Cutaneous granulomatous reaction from mesotherapy. Dermatol Surg 35 (2009) 291-293
9. Sañudo A., Vallejo F., Sierra M., et al. Nontuberculous mycobacteria infection after mesotherapy: Preliminary report of 15 cases. Int J Dermatol 46 (2007) 649-653
10. Al-Khenaizan S. Facial cutaneous ulcers following mesotherapy. Dermatol Surg 34 (2008) 832-834
11. Collis N., Elliot L.A., Sharpe C., et al. Cellulite treatment: A myth or reality: A prospective randomized, controlled trial of two therapies, endermologie and aminophylline cream. Plast Reconstr Surg 104 (1999) 1110-1114
12. Neira R., Arroyave J., Ramirez H., et al. Fat liquefaction: effect of low-level laser energy on adipose tissue. Plast Reconstr Surg 110 (2002) 912-922
13. Atiyeh B.S., and Dibo S.A. Nonsurgical nonablative treatment of aging skin: Radiofrequency technologies between aggressive marketing and evidence-based efficacy. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33 (2009) 283-294
14. de Felipe I., Del Cueto S.R., Pérez E., et al. Adverse reactions after nonablative radiofrequency: Follow-up of 290 patients. J Cosmet Dermatol 6 (2007) 163-166
15. Manstein D., Laubach H., Watanabe K., et al. Selective cryolysis: A novel method of non-invasive fat removal. Lasers Surg Med 40 (2008) 595-604
16. Zelickson B., Egbert B.M., Preciado J., et al. Cryolipolysis for noninvasive fat cell destruction: Initial results from a pig model. Dermatol Surg 35 (2009) 1462-1470
17. Coleman S.R., Sachdeva K., Egbert B.M., et al. Clinical efficacy of noninvasive cryolipolysis and its effects on peripheral nerves. Aesthetic Plast Surg 33 (2009) 482-488
18. Zocchi M.L. Ultrasonic assisted lipoplasty. Technical refinements and clinical evaluations. Clin Plast Surg 23 (1996) 575-598
19. Kenkel J.M., Robinson Jr. J.B., Beran S.J., et al. The tissue effects of ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. Plast Reconstr Surg 102 (1998) 213-220
20. Cooter R., Babidge W., Mutimer K., et al. Ultrasound-assisted lipoplasty. ANZ J Surg 7 (2001) 309-317
21. Igra H., and Satur N.M. Tumescent liposuction versus internal ultrasonic-assisted tumescent liposuction. A side-to-side comparison. Dermatol Surg 23 (1997) 1213-1218
22. Brown S.A., Greenbaum L., Shtukmaster S., et al. Characterization of nonthermal focused ultrasound for noninvasive selective fat cell disruption (lysis): Technical and preclinical assessment. Plast Reconstr Surg 124 (2009) 92-101
23. Blana A., Rogenhofer S., Ganzer R., et al. Eight years' experience with high-intensity focused ultrasonography for treatment of localized prostate cancer. Urology 72 (2008) 1329-1333
24. Hou A.H., Sullivan K.F., and Crawford E.D. Targeted focal therapy for prostate cancer: a review. Curr Opin Urol 19 (2009) 283-289
25. http://www.hc-sc.gc.ca
26. Teitelbaum S.A., Burns J.L., Kubota J., et al. Noninvasive body contouring by focused ultrasound: safety and efficacy of the Contour I device in a multicenter, controlled, clinical study. Plast Reconstr Surg 120 (2007) 779-789
27. http://www.liposonix.com
28. Moreno-Moraga J., Valero-Altés T., Riquelme A.M., et al. Body contouring by non-invasive transdermal focused ultrasound. Lasers Surg Med 39 (2007) 315-323