Semantic analytics in intelligence: Applying semantic association discovery to determine relevance of heterogeneous documents

Advanced Topics in Database Research

Volumn 5, Issue , 2006, Pages 401-419

  Aleman Meza, Boanerges ^a   Sheth, Amit P ^a   Palaniswami, Devanand ^a   Eavenson, Matthew ^b   Arpinar, I Budak ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF GEORGIA   (United States)

^b University of Georgia ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 74549143980     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4018/978-1-59140-935-9.ch020     Document Type: Chapter

References (44)

1. Aleman-Meza, B., Burns, P., Eavenson, M., Palaniswami, D., & Sheth, A. P. (2005, May 19-20). An ontological approach to the document access problem of insider threat. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI-2005), Atlanta, GA (pp. 485-491). Springer.
2. Aleman-Meza, B., Halaschek-Wiener, C., Arpinar, I. B., Ramakrishnan, C., & Sheth, A. P. (2005). Ranking complex relationships on the semantic Web. IEEE Internet Computing, 9(3), 37-44.
3. Aleman-Meza, B., Halaschek, C., & Arpinar, I. B. (2005). Collective knowledge composition in a peer-to-peer network. In L. C. Rivero, J. H. Doorn, & V. E. Ferraggine (Eds.), Encyclopedia of database technologies and applications (pp. 74-77). Hershey, PA: Idea Group Reference.
4. Aleman-Meza, B., Halaschek, C., Arpinar, I. B., & Sheth, A. (2003, September 7-8). Context-aware semantic association ranking. Paper presented at the First International Workshop on Semantic Web and Databases, Berlin, Germany.
5. th International Conference on Software Engineering and Knowledge Engineering (SEKE2004): Workshop on Ontology in Action, Banff, Canada.
6. Anderson, R., & Brackney, R. (2004). Understanding the insider threat. Rockville, MD: RAND Corporation.
7. Anti money laundering. (2003). White paper. Semagix, Inc. Retrieved from http://www.semagix.com/documents/anti_money_laundering.pdf
8. Anyanwu, K., & Sheth, A. P. (2003, May 20-24). r-Queries: Enabling querying for semantic associations on the semantic Web. Paper presented at the 12th International World Wide Web Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
9. th International World Wide Web Conference, Chiba Japan.
10. Arpinar, I. B., Sheth, A. P., Ramakrishnan, C., Usery, E. L., Azami, M., & Kwan, M.-P. (2004). Geospatial ontology development and demantic snalytics. In J. P. Wilson & A. S. Fotheringham (Eds.), Handbook of heographic information science. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Publishing. Retrieved from http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/lib/download/ASRU+2004-gis.pdf
11. Berners-Lee, T., Hendler, J., & Lassila, O. (2001). The semantic Web - A new form of Web content that is meaningful to computers will unleash a revolution of new possibilities. Scientific American, 284(5), 34+.
12. Brickley, D., & Guha, R. V. (2000). RDF vocabulary description language 1.0: RDF schema. W3C Recommendation. Retrieved May 12, 2005, from http://www.w3.org/TR/2003/PR-rdf-schema-20031215/
13. Cathey, R., Ma, L., Goharian, N., & Grossman, D. (2003, November 2-8). Misuse detection for information retrieval systems. In Proceedings of the 2003 ACM CIKM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, New Orleans, LA (pp. 183-190). New York: ACM Press.
14. Chen, M. S., Han, J. W., & Yu, P. S. (1996). Data mining: An overview from a database perspective. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 8(6), 866-883.
15. Coutaz, J., Crowley, J. L., Dobson, S., & Garlan, D. (2005). Context is key. Communications of the ACM, 48(3), 49-53.
16. Dill, S., Eiron, N., Gibson, D., Gruhl, D., Guha, R. V., Jhingran, A., et al. (2003, May 20-24). SemTag and Seeker: Bootstrapping the semantic web via automated semantic annotation. Paper presented at the Twelfth International World Wide Web Conference, Budapest, Hungary.
17. Ding, L., Kolari, P., Finin, T., Joshi, A., Peng, Y., & Yesha, Y. (2005, March 21-23). On homeland security and the semantic Web: A provenance and trust aware inference framework. Paper presented at the AAAI Spring Symposium on AI Technologies for Homeland Security, Stanford University, California, USA.
18. Fayyad, U. M., Piatetsky-Shapiro, G., Smyth, P., & Uthurusamy, R. (1996). Advances in knowledge discovery and data mining. Menlo Park, CA: AAAI/MIT Press.
19. Guha, R. V., & McCool, R. (2003). TAP: A semantic Web test-bed. Journal of Web Semantics, 1(1), 81-87.
20. th International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Toronto, Canada.
21. Hammond, B., Sheth, A., & Kochut, K. (2002). Semantic enhancement engine: A modular document enhancement platform for semantic applications over heterogeneous content. In V. Kashyap & L. Shklar (Eds.), Real world semantic Web applications (pp. 29-49). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: IOS Press, Inc.
22. Handschuh, S., Staab, S., & Studer, R. (2003). Leveraging metadata creation for the semantic web with CREAM. Ki 2003. Advances in Artificial Intelligence, 2821, 19-33.
23. th International Semantic Web Conference, Galway, Ireland.
24. Karvounarakis, G., Alexaki, S., Christophides, V., Plexousakis, D., & Scholl, M. (2002, May 7-11). RQL: A declarative query language for RDF. Paper presented at The Eleventh International World Wide Web Conference, Honolulu, HI, USA.
25. Krebs, V. (2002). Mapping networks of terrorist cells. Connections, 24(3), 43-52.
26. Lassila, O., & Swick, R. R. (1999). Resource description framework (RDF) model and syntax specification. W3C Recommendation. Retrieved May 12, 2005, from http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-rdf-syntax/
27. Ma, L., Goharian, N., & Meyers, C. (2005, May 19-20). Detecting misuse of information retrieval systems using data mining techniques. Paper presented at the IEEE International Conference on Intelligence and Security Informatics (ISI-2005), Atlanta, GA, USA.
28. Milnor, W. H., Ramakrishnan, C., Perry, M., Sheth, A. P., Miller, J. A., & Kochut, K. J. (2005). Discovering informative subgraphs in RDF graphs (Tech. Rep. No. 05-001). Athens, GA: LSDIS Lab, Computer Science, University of Georgia. Retrieved from http://lsdis.cs.uga.edu/library/download/PID-RXSPQSVR-1114806461.pdf
29. Mukherjea, S., & Bamba:, B. (2004, August 30-September 3). BioPatentMiner: An information retrieval system for biomedical patents. Paper presented at the Thirtieth International Conference on Very Large Data Bases, Toronto, Canada.
30. Perry, M., Janik, M., Ramakrishnan, C., Ibanez, C., Arpinar, I. B., & Sheth, A. P. (2005, July 17). Peer-to-peer discovery of semantic associations. Paper presented at the 2nd International Workshop on Peer-to-Peer Knowledge Management (P2PKM), La Jolla, CA.
31. Popov, B., Kiryakov, A., Ognyanoff, D., Manov, D., Kirilov, A., & Goranov, M. (2003, October 20-23). KIM - Semantic annotation platform. Paper presented at the 2nd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC2003), Sanibel Island, FL.
32. Rectenwald, M., Lee, K., Seo, Y., Giampapa, J. A., & Sycara, K. (2004). Proof of concept system for automaticallydetermining need-to-know access privileges: Installation notes and user guide (No. CMU-RI-TR-04-56). Pittsburgh, PA: Robotics Institute, Carnegie Mellon University.
33. th International World Wide Web, New York.
34. Rodriguez, M. A., & Egenhofer, M. J. (2003). Determining semantic similarity among entity classes from different ontologies. IEEE Transactions on Knowledge and Data Engineering, 15(2), 442-456.
35. th International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, McLean, VA.
36. Sheth, A. P. (2005, August 25-27). Enterprise applications of semantic Web: The sweet spot of risk and compliance. Paper presented at the IFIP International Conference on Industrial Applications of Semantic Web, Jyväskylä, Finland.
37. Sheth, A. P., Aleman-Meza, B., Arpinar, I. B., Halaschek, C., Ramakrishnan, C., Bertram, C., et al. (2005). Semantic association identification and knowledge discovery for national security applications. Journal of Database Management, 16(1), 33-53.
38. Sheth, A. P., Arpinar, I. B., & Kashyap, V. (2003). Relationships at the heart of semantic Web: Modeling, discovering and exploiting complex semantic relationships. In M. Nikravesh, B. Azvin, R. Yager & L. A. Zadeh (Eds.), Enhancing the power of the Internet studies in fuzziness and soft computing (pp. 63-94). Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
39. Sheth, A. P., Bertram, C., Avant, D., Hammond, B., Kochut, K., & Warke, Y. (2002). Managing semantic content for the Web. IEEE Internet Computing, 6(4), 80-87.
40. Sheth, A. P., Ramakrishnan, C., & Thomas, C. (2005). Semantics for the semantic web: The implicit, the formal and the powerful. International Journal on Semantic Web and Information Systems, 1(1), 1-18.
41. Subramaniam, L. V., Mukherjea, S., Kankar, P., Srivastava, B., Batra, V. S., Kamesam, P. V., et al. (2003, November 2-8). Information extraction from biomedical literature: methodology, evaluation and an application. Paper presented at the 2003 ACM CIKM International Conference on Information and Knowledge Management, New Orleans, LA.
42. To catch a thief. (2004). Concept White Paper. Visual Analytics Inc. Retrieved September 28, 2004, from http://www.visualanalytics.com/whitepaper/HowToCatchA Thief.cfm
43. th International Conference on Knowledge Engineering and Management (EKAW 2002), Sigüenza, Spain.
44. Woods, W. (1975). What's in a link: Foundations for semantic networks. In D. Bobrow & A. Collins (Eds.), Representation and Understanding, (pp. 35-82). New York: Academic Press.