Evaluation of simplified methods of analysis for structures with triple friction pendulum isolators

Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics

Volumn 39, Issue 1, 2010, Pages 5-22

  Fadi, Fabio ^a,b   Constantinou, Michael C ^a  

^a State University of New York   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF UDINE   (Italy)

Author keywords

Seismic isolation; Simplified analysis; Triple friction pendulum bearing

Indexed keywords

FRICTION; SEISMOLOGY; TRIBOLOGY;

DISPLACEMENT DEMAND; FRICTION PENDULUM; FRICTION PENDULUM BEARINGS; NONLINEAR RESPONSE HISTORY ANALYSIS; PEAK VELOCITIES; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SIMPLIFIED ANALYSIS; SIMPLIFIED METHOD; VALIDATION STUDY;

PENDULUMS;

BEARING CAPACITY; DISPLACEMENT; EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING; FRICTION; SEISMIC ISOLATION; SEISMIC RESPONSE; STIFFNESS; STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS;

EID: 74549141417     PISSN: 00988847     EISSN: 10969845     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.930     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Morgan TA. The use of innovative base isolation systems to achieve complex seismic performance objectives. Ph.D. Dissertation, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, 2007.
2. Fenz DM, Constantinou MC. Spherical sliding isolation bearings with adaptive behavior: theory. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008; 37(2):163-183.
3. Fenz DM, Constantinou MC. Spherical sliding isolation bearings with adaptive behavior: experimental verification. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 2008; 37(2):185-205.
4. Fenz DM, Constantinou MC. Modeling triple friction pendulum bearings for response history analysis. Earthquake Spectra 2008; 24(4):1011-1028.
5. American Society of Civil Engineers. Minimum design loads for buildings and other structures. Standard ASCE/ SEI 7-05, Reston, VA, 2005.
6. American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. Guide Specification for Seismic Isolation Design, Washington, DC, 1999.
7. Iwan WD, Gates NC. The effective period ad damping of a class of hysteretic structures. Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics 1979; 7(3):199-221.
8. Iwan WD, Gates NC. Estimating earthquake response of simple hysteretic structures. Journal of the Engineering Mechanics Division 1979; 105(EM3):391-405.
9. Kircher CA, Lashkari B. Statistical evaluation of nonlinear response of seismic isolation systems. Technical Report No. JBA 109-070, Jack R. Benjamin and Associates, Inc., Mountain View, CA, 1989.
10. Theodossiou D, Constantinou MC. Evaluation of SEAOC design requirements for sliding isolated structures. Technical Report NCEER 91-0015, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 1991.
11. Winters CW, Constantinou MC. Evaluation of static and response spectrum analysis procedures of SEAOC/UBC for seismic isolated structures. Technical Report NCEER 93-0004, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 1993.
12. Tsopelas P, Constantinou MC, Kircher CA, Whittaker AS. Evaluation of simplified methods of analysis for yielding structures. Technical Report NCEER 97-0012, National Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 1997.
13. Chopra AK, Goel RK. Evaluation of NSP to estimate seismic deformation: SDF systems. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 1999; 126(4):482-490.
14. Ramirez OM, Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS, Kircher CA, Chrysostomou CZ. Evaluation of simplified methods of analysis of yielding structures with damping systems. Earthquake Spectra 2002; 18(3):531-547.
15. Pavlou EA, Constantinou MC. Response of elastic and inelastic structures with damping systems to near-field and soft-soil ground motions. Engineering Structures 2004; 26(9):1217-1230.
16. Guyader AC, Iwan WD. Determining equivalent linear parameters for use in a capacity spectrum method of analysis. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2006; 132(1):59-67.
17. Newmark N, Rosenblueth E. Fundamentals of Earthquake Engineering. Prentice-Hall: London, 1971.
18. Ramirez OM, Constantinou MC, Gomez JD, Whittaker AS, Chrysostomou CZ. Elastic and inelastic seismic response of structure with damping systems. Earthquake Spectra 2002; 18(3):501-530.
19. Lin YY, Chang KC. Effect of site classes on damping reduction factors. Journal of Structural Engineering (ASCE) 2004; 130(11):1667-1675.
20. Pekcan G, Mander JB, Chen SS. Design and retrofit methodology for buildings structures with supplemental energy dissipating systems. Technical Report MCEER-99-0021, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 1999.
21. Constantinou MC, Whittaker AS, Kalpakidis Y, Fenz DM, Warn GP. Performance of seismic isolation hardware under service and seismic loading. Technical Report MCEER-07-0012, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 2007.
22. Computers and Structures Inc. SAP2000: Static and Dynamic Finite Element Analysis of Structures (Version 11.0.2) Analysis Reference Manual, Berkeley, CA, U.S.A., 2007.
23. Fenz DM, Constantinou MC. Development, implementation and verification of dynamic analysis models for multi-spherical sliding bearings. Technical Report MCEER-08-0018, Multidisciplinary Center for Earthquake Engineering Research, University at Buffalo, State University of New York, Buffalo, NY, 2008.