Optimistic anonymous participation in inter-organizational workflow instances

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 4332 LNCS, Issue , 2006, Pages 86-100

  Biskup, Joachim ^a   Parthe, Joerg ^a  

^a TU DORTMUND UNIVERSITY   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION SYSTEMS; INFORMATION USE; NETWORK SECURITY;

COMBINING TECHNIQUES; CONTROL INFORMATION; ELECTRONIC BUSINESS; INTER-ORGANIZATIONAL WORKFLOW; ONION ROUTING; RESTRICTED FLOWS; STATE-DEPENDENT; WORKFLOW INSTANCES;

ACCESS CONTROL;

EID: 74549139700     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11961635_6     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (23)

1. Elisa Bertino, Elena Ferrari, and Vijay Atluri. The specification and enforcement of authorization constraints in workflow management systems. ACM Trans. Inf. Syst. Secur., 2(1):65–104, 1999.
2. Joachim Biskup and Christian Eckert. About the enforcement of state dependent security specifications. In T.F. Keefe and C.E. Landwehr, editors, Database Security VII, pages 3–17, Boston, etc., 1994. Kluwer.
3. Joachim Biskup and Thomas Leineweber. State-dependent security decisions for distributed object-systems. In Martin S. Olivier and David L. Spooner, editors, Database and Application Security XV, pages 105–118. Kluwer, 2002.
4. Joachim Biskup, Thomas Leineweber, and Jörg Parthe. Administration rights in the sdsd-system. In Sabrina De Capitani di Vimercati, Indrakshi Ray, and Indrajit Ray, editors, Data and Applications Security XVII: Status and Prospects, pages 149–162. Kluwer, 2004.
5. Joachim Biskup and Jörg Parthe. Optimistic anonymous participation in inter-organizational workflow instances. http://ls6-www.cs.uni-dortmund.de/issi/publications/2006.html.de, 2006.
6. L. M. Camarinha-Matos and H. Afsarmanesh, editors. Processes and Foundations for Virtual Organizations, volume 134 of IFIP International Federation for Information Processing. Springer, Berlin, 2003.
7. Fabio Casati, Silvana Castano, and Maria Grazia Fugini. Managing workflow authorization constraints through active database technology. Information Systems Frontiers, 3(3):319–338, 2001.
8. M. Coetzee and J.H.P. Eloff. Towards web service access control. Computers & Security, 23(7):559–570, 2004.
9. Claudia Diaz, Stefaan Seys, Joris Claessens, and Bart Preneel. Towards measuring anonymity. In Roger Dingledine and Paul Syverson, editors, Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2002, LNCS, pages 54–68, Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. Springer.
10. Marit Hansen and Andreas Pfitzmann. Anonymity, unlinkability, unobservability, pseudonymity, and identity management - a consolidated proposal for terminology. version v0.23. http://dud.inf.tu-dresden.de/Literatur V1.shtml, 2005.
11. Wei-Kuang Huang and Vijayalakshmi Atluri. Secureflow: a secure web-enabled workflow management system. In Proceedings of the Fourth ACM Workshop on Role-based Access Control, pages 83–94. ACM Press, 1999.
12. Myong H. Kang, Joon S. Park, and Judith N. Froscher. Access control mechanisms for inter-organizational workflow. In Proceedings of the Sixth ACM Symposium on Access Control Models and Technologies, pages 66–74. ACM Press, 2001.
13. Konstantin Knorr. Dynamic access control through petri net workflows. In Proceedings of the 16th Annual Computer Security Applications Conference, pages 159–167. IEEE Computer Society, 2000.
14. Sejong Oh and Seog Park. Task-role-based access control model. Information Systems, 28(6):533–562, September 2003.
15. Karsten A. Schulz and Maria E. Orlowska. Facilitating cross-organisational workflows with a workflow view approach. Data & Knowledge Engineering, 51(1):109– 147, 2004.
16. Andrei Serjantov and George Danezis. Towards an information theoretic metric for anonymity. In Roger Dingledine and Paul Syverson, editors, Privacy Enhancing Technologies 2002, LNCS, pages 41–53, Berlin Heidelberg, 2003. Springer.
17. Sandra Steinbrecher and Stefan Köpsell. Modelling Unlinkability. http://www.inf.tu-dresden.de/∼ss64/Papers/PET-Unlinkability.pdf, 2003.
18. Troy J. Strader, Fu-Ren Lin, and Michael J. Shaw. Information infrastructure for electronic virtual organization management. Decision Support Systems, 23:75–94, 1998.
19. Yuqing Sun and Peng Pan. Pres: a practical flexible rbac workflow system. In ICEC ’05: Proceedings of the 7th International Conference on Electronic Commerce, pages 653–658, New York, NY, USA, 2005. ACM Press.
20. Jacques Wainer, Paulo Barthelmess, and Akhil Kumar. W-rbac – a workflow security model incorporating controlled overriding of constraints. International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 12(4):455–485, 2003.
21. Jacques Wainer, Fabio Bezerra, and Paulo Barthelmess. Tucupi: a flexible workflow system based on overridable constraints. In Proceedings of the 2004 ACM Symposium on Applied Computing, pages 498–502, 2004.
22. Shengli Wu, Amit Sheth, John Miller, and Zongwei Luo. Authorization and access control of application data in workflow systems. J. Intell. Inf. Syst., 18(1):71–94, 2002.
23. S. Yang, H. Lam, and S. Y. W. Su. Trust-based security model and enforcement mechanism for web service technology. In Technologies for E-Services. Third International Workshop, TES 2002., pages 151–160. Springer, 2002.