Applying bayesian analysis to evaluation of developmental screening

Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics

Volumn 30, Issue 6, 2009, Pages 583-592

  Camp, Bonnie W ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

BAYES THEOREM; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; DEVELOPMENTAL DISORDER; EVALUATION; HUMAN; INFANT; MASS SCREENING; METHODOLOGY; PRESCHOOL CHILD; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; REVIEW; STATISTICAL MODEL;

BAYES THEOREM; CHILD DEVELOPMENT; CHILD, PRESCHOOL; DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES; HUMANS; INFANT; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MASS SCREENING; MODELS, STATISTICAL; PROBABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS;

EID: 74549129520     PISSN: 0196206X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/DBP.0b013e3181c3c3a8     Document Type: Review

References (27)

1. Council on Children With Disabilities, Section on Developmental Behavioral Pediatrics, Bright Futures Steering Committee, Medical Home Initiatives for Children With Special Needs Project Advisory Committee. Identifying infants and young children with developmental disorders in the medical home: an algorithm for developmental surveillance and screening. [erratum appears in Pediatrics. 2006;118:1808-1809]. Pediatrics. 2006;118:405-420.
2. Squires J, Nickel RE, Eisert D. Early detection of developmental problems: strategies for monitoring young children in the practice setting. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1996;17:420-427.
3. Gill CJ, Sabin L, Schmid CH. Why clinicians are natural Bayesians. BMJ. 2005;330:1080-1083. (Pubitemid 40646566)
4. Sackett DL. A primer on the precision and accuracy of the clinical examination. JAMA. 1992;267:2638-2644.
5. Ebell MH, Smith MA, Barry HC, Ives K, Carey M. The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have strep throat? JAMA. 2000;284:2912-2918.
6. Melbye H, Straume B, Aasebø U, Dale K. Diagnosis of pneumonia in adults in general practice: relative importance of typical symptoms and chest signs evaluated against a radiographic reference standard. Scand J Prim Health Care. 1992;10:226-233.
7. Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Diagnostic tests 4: likelihood ratios. BMJ. 2004;329:168-169.
8. Aylward GP. Conceptual issues in developmental screening and assessment. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1997;18:340-349.
9. Altman DG. Some Common Problems in Medical Research. Practical Statistics for Medical Research. New York, NY: Chapman and Hall; 1991:396-438.
10. Berry D. Statistics, a Bayesian Perspective. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing; 1996.
11. Jaeschke R, Guyatt S, Lijmer J. Diagnostic tests. In: Guyatt G, Drummond R, eds. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. Chicago, IL: AMA Press; 1994:121-139.
12. Letelier LM, Bada G, Capurro D, et al. Examples of likelihood ratios. In: Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ, eds. Users' Guides to the Medical Literature: A Manual for Evidence-Based Clinical Practice. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: McGraw Hill; 2002:449-480.
13. Squires J, Potter L, Bricker D. The ASQ User's Guide for the Ages and Stages Questionnaires: A Parent-Completed Child Monitoring System. 2nd ed. Baltimore, MD: Paul H. Brookes; 1999.
14. Glascoe FP. Are overreferrals on developmental screening tests really a problem? Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2001;155:54-59.
15. Grimes DA, Schulz KF. Refining clinical diagnosis with likelihood ratios. Lancet. 2005;365:1500-1505.
16. Wang LW, Wang ST, Huang CC. Validity of the Clinical Adaptive Test (CAT)/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale (CLAMS) as a screening instrument for very low birth weight infants in Taiwan. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2005;26:412-418.
17. Groen WB, Swinkels SH, van der Gaag RJ, Buitelaar JK. Finding effective screening instruments for autism using Bayes theorem. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2007;161:415-416.
18. Burgess DB, Householder JA, Splicer CL, et al. The use of the Denver II in a two-stage developmental screening protocol. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1996;17:290.
19. Glascoe FP. Collaborating with Parents: Using Parents' Evaluation of Developmental Status to Detect and Address Developmental and Behavioral Problems. Nashville, TN: Vandermeer Press; 1998.
20. Rosenberg SA, Zhang D, Robinson C. Prevalence of developmental delays and participation in early intervention services for young children. Pediatrics. 2008;121:e1503-e1509.
21. Richardson WS, Wilson MC, McGinn TG. Differential diagnosis. In: Guyatt G, Rennie D, Meade MO, Cook DJ, eds. User's Guide to the Medical Literature. 2nd ed. Chicago, IL: McGraw Hill Medical; 2002:407-417.
22. Sices L, Roberts DG, Stancin T. PEDS, ASQ and physician's assessment: discordant results in developmental screening. Pediatrics. 2009;124:670-1647
23. Hix-Small H, Marks K, Squires J, Nickel R. Impact of implementing developmental screening at 12 and 24 months in a pediatric practice. Pediatrics. 2007;120:381-389.
24. Camp BW. Evaluating bias in validity studies of developmental/behavioral screening tests. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2007;28:234-240.
25. Glascoe FP, Byrne KE, Ashford LG, Johnson KL, Chang B, Strickland B. Accuracy of the Denver-II in developmental screening. Pediatrics. 1992;89:1221-1225.
26. Vincer MJ, Cake H, Graven M, Dodds L, McHugh S, Fraboni T. A population-based study to determine the performance of the Cognitive Adaptive Test/Clinical Linguistic and Auditory Milestone Scale to predict the mental developmental index at 18 months on the Bayley Scales of infant development-ii in very preterm infants. Pediatrics. 2005;116:e864-e867.
27. Macias MM, Saylor CF, Greer MK, Charles JM, Bell N, Katikaneni LD. Infant screening: the usefulness of the Bayley Infant Neurodevelopmental Screener and the Clinical Adaptive Test/ Clinical Linguistic Auditory Milestone Scale. J Dev Behav Pediatr. 1998;19:155-161.