Is the body in the eye of the beholder?. Visual processing of bodies in individuals with anomalous anatomical sensory and motor features

Neuropsychologia

Volumn 48, Issue 3, 2010, Pages 689-702

  Corradi Dell'Acqua, Corrado ^a,b   Tessari, Alessia ^c  

^a SISSA   (Italy)

^b UNIVERSITY OF GENEVA   (Switzerland)

^c UNIVERSITY OF BOLOGNA   (Italy)

Author keywords

Amelia; Biological movement; Birth disorders; Handedness task; Self; Sense of body

Indexed keywords

AGNOSIA; ANATOMICAL VARIATION; ARTICLE; BODY BUILD; BODY MOVEMENT; BRAIN DAMAGE; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM FUNCTION; COGNITION; HANDEDNESS; HUMAN; MOTOR SYSTEM; NEUROIMAGING; NEUROPSYCHOLOGY; NEUROSCIENCE; NONHUMAN; PERCEPTION; PROPRIOCEPTION; SENSORIMOTOR FUNCTION; TASK PERFORMANCE; VISUAL STIMULATION; VISUAL SYSTEM FUNCTION;

BODY IMAGE; COGNITION; FUNCTIONAL LATERALITY; HUMANS; MOTION PERCEPTION; MUSCULOSKELETAL ABNORMALITIES; NEUROPSYCHOLOGICAL TESTS; PERIPHERAL NERVOUS SYSTEM DISEASES; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 74449088653     PISSN: 00283932     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.11.029     Document Type: Article

References (145)

1. Auclair L., Noulhiane M., Raibaut P., and Amarenco G. Where are your body parts? A pure case of heterotopagnosia following left parietal stroke. Neurocase: Case Studies in Neuropsychology, Neuropsychiatry, and Behavioural Neurology (2009) 1-7 10.1080/13554790902911642
2. Aymoz C., and Viviani P. Perceptual asynchronies for biological and non-biological visual events. Vision Research 44 13 (2004) 1547-1563 10.1016/j.visres.2003.12.011
3. Beardsworth T., and Buckner T. The ability to recognize oneself from a video recording of one's movements without seeing one's body. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 18 (1981) 19-22
4. Beauchamp M.S., Lee K.E., Haxby J.V., and Martin A. FMRI responses to video and point-light displays of moving humans and manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15 7 (2003) 991-1001 10.1162/089892903770007380
5. Berlucchi G., and Aglioti S.M. The body in the brain revisited. Experimental Brain Research (2009) 10.1007/s00221-009r-r1970-7
6. Bertenthal B.I., Proffitt D.R., Spetner N.B., and Thomas M.A. The development of infant sensitivity to biomechanical motions. Child Development 56 3 (1985) 531-543
7. Biederman I. Recognition-by-components: A theory of human image understanding. Psychological Review 94 2 (1987) 115-147
8. Bosbach S., Cole J., Prinz W., and Knoblich G. Inferring another's expectation from action: The role of peripheral sensation. Nature Neuroscience 8 10 (2005) 1295-1297 10.1038/nn1535
9. Bosbach S., Knoblich G., Reed C.L., Cole J., and Prinz W. Body inversion effect without body sense: Insights from deafferentation. Neuropsychologia 44 14 (2006) 2950-2958 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.06.018
10. Bremmer F., Schlack A., Shah N.J., Zafiris O., Kubischik M., Hoffmann K., et al. Polymodal motion processing in posterior parietal and premotor cortex: A human fMRI study strongly implies equivalencies between humans and monkeys. Neuron 29 1 (2001) 287-296
11. Bressman S.B. Dystonia. Current Opinion in Neurology 11 4 (1998) 363-372
12. Brugger, P., Kollias, S. S., Müri, R. M., Crelier, G., Hepp-Reymond, M., & Regard, M. (2000). Beyond re-membering: Phantom sensations of congenitally absent limbs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 97(11), 6167-6172. doi:VL-97.
13. Burchard J.M. Zur Frage nach der Natur von Phantomerlebnissen bei angeborener Gliedmaßenverstümmelung. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience 207 4 (1965) 360-377 10.1007/BF00361229
14. Buxbaum L.J., and Coslett H.B. Specialised structural descriptions for human body parts: Evidence from autotopagnosia. Cognitive Neuropsychology 18 4 (2001) 289 10.1080/02643290126172
15. Calvo-Merino, B., Ehrenberg, S., Leung, D., & Haggard, P. (2009). Experts see it all: Configural effects in action observation. Psychological Research. doi:10.1007/s00426-009-0262-y.
16. Carruthers G. Types of body representation and the sense of embodiment. Consciousness and Cognition 17 4 (2008) 1302-1316 10.1016/j.concog.2008.02.001
17. Casile, A., & Giese, M. A. (2006). Nonvisual motor training influences biological motion perception. Current Biology: CB, 16(1), 69-74. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2005.10.071.
18. Cattaneo, L., & Rizzolatti, G. (2009). The mirror neuron system. Archives of Neurology, 66(5), 557-560. doi:10.1001/archneurol.2009.41.
19. Cleret de Langavant, L., Trinkler, I., Cesaro, P., & Bachoud-Lévi, A. (2009). Heterotopagnosia: When I point at parts of your body. Neuropsychologia, 47(7), 1745-1755. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.02.016.
20. Collishaw S.M., and Hole G.J. Featural and configurational processes in the recognition of faces of different familiarity. Perception 29 8 (2000) 893-909
21. Cooper, L. A., & Shepard, R. N. (1973). Chronometric studies of rotation of mental images. In W. G. Chase (Cur.), Visual Information Processing (pp. 75-176). New York: Academic Press.
22. Corradi-Dell'Acqua, C., Hesse, M. D., Rumiati, R. I., & Fink, G. R. (2008). Where is a nose with respect to a foot? The left posterior parietal cortex processes spatial relationships among body parts. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 18(12), 2879-2890. doi:bhn046.
23. Corradi-Dell'Acqua, C., & Rumiati, R. I. (2007). What the Brain knows about the Body: Evidence for Dissociable Representations. In F. Santoianni & C. Sabatano (Cur.), Brain Development In Learning Environments: Embodied Cognition and Perceptual Learning (pp. 50-64). Newcastle, UK: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
24. Corradi-Dell'Acqua, C., Tomasino, B., & Fink, G. R. (2009). What is the position of an arm relative to the body? Neural correlates of body schema and body structural description. Journal of Neuroscience, 29(13), 4162-4171. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.4861-08.2009.
25. Critchley M. Tactile thought, with special reference to the blind. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Medicine 46 1 (1953) 27-30
26. Cutting J.E. Generation of synthetic male and female walkers through manipulation of a biomechanical invariant. Perception 7 4 (1978) 393-405
27. Cutting J.E., and Kozlowski L.T. Recognizing friends by their walk: Gait perception without familiarity cues. Bulletin of the Psychonomic Society 9 5 (1977) 353-356
28. Cutting J.E., Moore C., and Morrison R. Masking the motions of human gait. Perception & Psychophysics 44 4 (1988) 339-347
29. Daurat-Hmeljiak, C., Stambak, M., & Berges, J. (1978). Il test dello schema corporeo. Una prova di conoscenza e costruzione dell'immagine del corpo. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
30. de Vries L.S. Neurological assessment of the preterm infant. Acta Paediatrica (Oslo, Norway: 1992) 85 7 (1996) 765-771
31. Decety J., and Grèzes J. Neural mechanisms subserving the perception of human actions. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 3 5 (1999) 172-178
32. Degos J.D., and Bachoud-Levi A.C. Pointing and its object: Towards the neuropsychology of objectivation. Revue Neurologique 154 4 (1998) 283-290
33. Desmurget, & Grafton. (2000). Forward modeling allows feedback control for fast reaching movements. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(11), 423-431.
34. Di Russo, F., Committeri, G., Pitzalis, S., Spitoni, G., Piccardi, L., Galati, G., et al. (2006). Cortical plasticity following surgical extension of lower limbs. NeuroImage, 30(1), 172-183. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.09.051.
35. Dominici, N., Daprati, E., Nico, D., Cappellini, G., Ivanenko, Y. P., & Lacquaniti, F. (2009). Changes in the limb kinematics and walking-distance estimation after shank elongation: Evidence for a locomotor body schema? Journal of Neurophysiology, 101(3), 1419-1429. doi:10.1152/jn.91165.2008.
36. Evans A.L. Does deficient sensorimotor experience affect drawing of human figures?. Pediatric Rehabilitation 3 2 (1999) 37-39
37. Felician, O., Anton, J., Nazarian, B., Roth, M., Roll, J., & Romaiguère, P. (2009). Where is your shoulder? Neural correlates of localizing others' body parts. Neuropsychologia, 47(8-9), 1909-1916. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.03.001.
38. Felician, O., Ceccaldi, M., Didic, M., Thinus-Blanc, C., & Poncet, M. (2003). Pointing to body parts: A double dissociation study. Neuropsychologia, 41(10), 1307-1316. doi:12757904.
39. Felician, O., & Romaiguère, P. (2008). Your body and mine: A neuropsychological perspective. Neurophysiologie Clinique=Clinical Neurophysiology, 38(3), 183-187. doi:10.1016/j.neucli.2008.02.003.
40. Felician, O., Romaiguère, P., Anton, J., Nazarian, B., Roth, M., Poncet, M., et al. (2004). The role of human left superior parietal lobule in body part localization. Annals of Neurology, 55(5), 749-751. doi:15122719.
41. Fiorio, M., Tinazzi, M., & Aglioti, S. M. (2006). Selective impairment of hand mental rotation in patients with focal hand dystonia. Brain: A Journal of Neurology, 129(Pt 1), 47-54. doi:10.1093/brain/awh630.
42. Fitzgerald, P. J., Lane, J. W., Thakur, P. H., & Hsiao, S. S. (2004). Receptive field properties of the macaque second somatosensory cortex: Evidence for multiple functional representations. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience, 24(49), 11193-11204. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3481-04.2004.
43. Fitzgerald, P. J., Lane, J. W., Thakur, P. H., & Hsiao, S. S. (2006a). Receptive Field Properties of the Macaque Second Somatosensory Cortex: Representation of Orientation on Different Finger Pads. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(24), 6473-6484. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5057-05.2006.
44. Fitzgerald, P. J., Lane, J. W., Thakur, P. H., & Hsiao, S. S. (2006b). Receptive field (RF) properties of the macaque second somatosensory cortex: RF size, shape, and somatotopic organization. Journal of Neuroscience, 26(24), 6485-6495. doi:10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5061-05.2006.
45. Flor H., Elbert T., Mühlnickel W., Pantev C., Wienbruch C., and Taub E. Cortical reorganization and phantom phenomena in congenital and traumatic upper-extremity amputees. Experimental Brain Research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Expérimentation Cérébrale 119 2 (1998) 205-212
46. Fox, R., & McDaniel, C. (1982). The perception of biological motion by human infants. Science, 218(4571), 486-487. doi:10.1126/science.7123249.
47. Funk, M., & Brugger, P. (2008). Mental rotation of congenitally absent hands. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 14(01), 81-89. doi:10.1017/S1355617708080041.
48. Funk, M., Lutz, K., Hotz-Boendermaker, S., Roos, M., Summers, P., Brugger, P., et al. (2008). Sensorimotor tongue representation in individuals with unilateral upper limb amelia. NeuroImage, 43(1), 121-127. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.06.011.
49. Funk, M., Shiffrar, M., & Brugger, P. (2005). Hand movement observation by individuals born without hands: Phantom limb experience constrains visual limb perception. Experimental Brain Research. Experimentelle Hirnforschung. Expérimentation Cérébrale, 164(3), 341-346. doi:10.1007/s00221-005r-r2255-4.
50. Giese, M. A., & Poggio, T. (2003). Neural mechanisms for the recognition of biological movements. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience, 4(3), 179-192. doi:10.1038/nrn1057.
51. Grèzes, J., Frith, C. D., & Passingham, R. E. (2004). Inferring false beliefs from the actions of oneself and others: An fMRI study. NeuroImage, 21(2), 744-750. doi:10.1016/S1053-8119(03)00665-7.
52. Grossman E.D., and Blake R. Brain activity evoked by inverted and imagined biological motion. Vision Research 41 10-11 (2001) 1475-1482
53. Grossman, E. D., Blake, R., & Kim, C. (2004). Learning to See Biological Motion: Brain Activity Parallels Behavior. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(9), 1669-1679. doi:10.1162/0898929042568569.
54. Grouios G. Phantom limb sensations: A review. Medical Science Research 26 (1998) 219-223
55. Grush R. The emulation theory of representation: Motor control, imagery, and perception. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 27 3 (2004) 377-396 discussion 396-442
56. Guariglia, C., & Antonucci, G. (1992). Personal and extrapersonal space: A case of neglect dissociation. Neuropsychologia, 30(11), 1001-1009. doi:10.1016/0028-3932(92)90051-M.
57. Guariglia, C., Piccardi, L., Puglisi Allegra, M. C., & Traballesi, M. (2002). Is autotopoagnosia real? EC says yes. A case study. Neuropsychologia, 40(10), 1744-1749. doi:11992662.
58. Hallett M. Physiology of dystonia. Advances in Neurology 78 (1998) 11-18
59. Hamilton, A., Wolpert, D., & Frith, U. (2004). Your own action influences how you perceive another person's action. Current Biology: CB, 14(6), 493-498. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2004.03.007.
60. Hommel B., Müsseler J., Aschersleben G., and Prinz W. The Theory of Event Coding (TEC): A framework for perception and action planning. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 5 (2001) 849-878 discussion 878-937
61. Iacoboni, M., Molnar-Szakacs, I., Gallese, V., Buccino, G., Mazziotta, J. C., & Rizzolatti, G. (2005). Grasping the intentions of others with one's own mirror neuron system. PLoS Biology, 3(3), e79. doi:10.1371/journal.pbio.0030079.
62. Ilizarov G.A., and Deviatov A.A. Surgical elongation of the leg. Ortopediia Travmatologiia I Protezirovanie 32 8 (1971) 20-25
63. Jacobs, A., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Walking perception by walking observers. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 157-169. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.157.
64. Jansson, G., & Johansson, G. (1973). Visual perception of bending motion. Perception, 2(3), 321-326. doi:10.1068/p020321.
65. Johansson G. Visual perception of biological motion and a model for its analysis. Perception & Psychophysics 14 2 (1973) 201-211
66. Karl A., Birbaumer N., Lutzenberger W., Cohen L.G., and Flor H. Reorganization of motor and somatosensory cortex in upper extremity amputees with phantom limb pain. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 21 10 (2001) 3609-3618
67. Kinsbourne, M., & Lempert, H. (1980). Human figure representation by blind children. The Journal of General Psychology, 102(1st Half), 33-37.
68. Knoblich G., and Flach R. Predicting the effects of actions: Interactions of perception and action. Psychological Science: A Journal of the American Psychological Society/APS 12 6 (2001) 467-472
69. Knoblich G., and Prinz W. Recognition of self-generated actions from kinematic displays of drawing. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 27 2 (2001) 456-465
70. Korte A. Kinematoskipische Untersuchungen. Zeitschrift fuer Psychologie 72 (1915) 194-296
71. Kozlowski L.T., and Cutting J.E. Recognizing sex of a walker from dynamic point-light display. Perception & Psychophysics 21 6 (1977) 575-580
72. Krägeloh-Mann I., Hagberg G., Meisner C., Schelp B., Haas G., Eeg-Olofsson K.E., et al. Bilateral spastic cerebral palsy-A comparative study between south-west Germany and western Sweden. I: Clinical patterns and disabilities. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 35 12 (1993) 1037-1047
73. Latash, M. L. (2002). Progress in motor control: Structure-function relations in voluntary movements. Human Kinetics.
74. Leder H., and Bruce V. When inverted faces are recognized: The role of configural information in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 53 2 (2000) 513-536
75. Lotze M., Flor H., Grodd W., Larbig W., and Birbaumer N. Phantom movements and pain. An fMRI study in upper limb amputees. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 124 Pt 11 (2001) 2268-2277
76. Loula, F., Prasad, S., Harber, K., & Shiffrar, M. (2005). Recognizing people from their movement. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31(1), 210-220. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.1.210.
77. Mahon, B. Z. (2008). Action recognition: Is it a motor process? Current Biology, 18(22), R1068-R1069. doi:10.1016/j.cub.2008.10.001.
78. Marr D., and Nishihara H.K. Representation and recognition of the spatial organization of three-dimensional shapes. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Containing Papers of a Biological Character Royal Society (Great Britain) 200 1140 (1978) 269-294
79. Mather, G., Radford, K., & West, S. (1992). Low-level visual processing of biological motion. Proceedings. Biological Sciences/The Royal Society, 249(1325), 149-155. doi:10.1098/rspb.1992.0097.
80. Maurer D., Grand R., and Mondloch C. The many faces of configural processing. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 6 6 (2002) 255-260
81. Melzack R., Israel R., Lacroix R., and Schultz G. Phantom limbs in people with congenital limb deficiency or amputation in early childhood. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 120 Pt 9 (1997) 1603-1620
82. Montoya P., Ritter K., Huse E., Larbig W., Braun C., Töpfner S., et al. The cortical somatotopic map and phantom phenomena in subjects with congenital limb atrophy and traumatic amputees with phantom limb pain. The European Journal of Neuroscience 10 3 (1998) 1095-1102
83. Moseley G.L. Why do people with complex regional pain syndrome take longer to recognize their affected hand?. Neurology 62 12 (2004) 2182-2186
84. Nico, D., Daprati, E., Rigal, F., Parsons, L. M., & Sirigu, A. (2004). Left and right hand recognition in upper limb amputees. Brain, 127(1), 120-132. doi:10.1093/brain/awh006.
85. Northrup, H., & Volcik, K. A. (2000). Spina bifida and other neural tube defects. Current Problems in Pediatrics, 30(10), 317-332. doi:10.1067/mpp.2000.112052.
86. Ogden C.L., Fryar C.D., Carroll M.D., and Flegal K.M. Mean body weight, height, and body mass index, United States 1960-2002. Advance Data 347 (2004) 1-17
87. Oram, M. W., & Perrett, D. I. (1994). Responses of Anterior Superior Temporal Polysensory (STPa) Neurons to "Biological Motion" Stimuli. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 6(2), 99-116. doi:10.1162/jocn.1994.6.2.99.
88. Ottoboni, G., Tessari, A., Cubelli, R., & Umiltà, C. (2005). Is handedness recognition automatic? A study using a Simon-like paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 31(4), 778-789. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.31.4.643b.
89. Paillard, J. (1999). Body schema and body image-A double dissociation in deafferented patients. In G. N. Gantchev, S. Mori, & J. Massion (Cur.), Motor control, today and tomorrow. Sophia: Academic Publishing House.
90. Paillard J., Michel F., and Stelmach G. Localization without content. A tactile analogue of 'blind sight'. Archives of Neurology 40 9 (1983) 548-551
91. Parsons, L. M. (1987a). Imagined spatial transformations of one's hands and feet. Cognitive Psychology, 19(2), 178-241. doi:3581757.
92. Parsons, L. M. (1987b). Imagined spatial transformation of one's body. Journal of Experimental Psychology. General, 116(2), 172-191. doi:2955072.
93. Parsons, L. M. (1994). Temporal and kinematic properties of motor behavior reflected in mentally simulated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 20(4), 709-730. doi:8083630.
94. Parsons L.M., and Fox P.T. The neural basis of implicit movements used in recognising hand shape. Cognitive Neuropsychology 15 (1998) 583-615
95. Parsons, L. M., Fox, P. T., Downs, J. H., Glass, T., Hirsch, T. B., & Martin, C. C., et al. (1995). Use of implicit motor imagery for visual shape discrimination as revealed by PET. Nature, 375(6526), 54-58. doi:7723842.
96. Pavlova, M., Krägeloh-Mann, I., Sokolov, A., & Birbaumer, N. (2001). Recognition of point-light biological motion displays by young children. Perception, 30(8), 925-933. doi:10.1068/p3157.
97. Pavlova, M., Lutzenberger, W., Sokolov, A. N., Birbaumer, N., & Krägeloh-Mann, I. (2007). Oscillatory MEG response to human locomotion is modulated by periventricular lesions. NeuroImage, 35(3), 1256-1263. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2007.01.030.
98. Pavlova, M., Marconato, F., Sokolov, A., Braun, C., Birbaumer, N., & Krägeloh-Mann, I. (2006). Periventricular leukomalacia specifically affects cortical MEG response to biological motion. Annals of Neurology, 59(2), 415-419. doi:10.1002/ana.20762.
99. Pavlova, M., Sokolov, A., Birbaumer, N., & Krägeloh-Mann, I. (2006). Biological motion processing in adolescents with early periventricular brain damage. Neuropsychologia, 44(4), 586-593. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2005.06.016.
100. Pavlova, M., Sokolov, A., Staudt, M., Marconato, F., Birbaumer, N., & Krägeloh-Mann, I. (2005). Recruitment of periventricular parietal regions in processing cluttered point-light biological motion. Cerebral Cortex (New York, N.Y.: 1991), 15(5), 594-601. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhh162.
101. Pavlova, M., Staudt, M., Sokolov, A., Birbaumer, N., & Krageloh-Mann, I. (2003). Perception and production of biological movement in patients with early periventricular brain lesions. Brain, 126(3), 692-701. doi:10.1093/brain/awg062.
102. Peissig J.J., and Tarr M.J. Visual object recognition: Do we know more now than we did 20 years ago?. Annual Review of Psychology 58 (2007) 75-96
103. Perrett D.I., Smith P.A., Mistlin A.J., Chitty A.J., Head A.S., Potter D.D., et al. Visual analysis of body movements by neurones in the temporal cortex of the macaque monkey: A preliminary report. Behavioural Brain Research 16 2-3 (1985) 153-170
104. Pick A. Stoerung der Orientierung am eigenen Koerper. Beitrag zur Lehre von Bewußtsein des eigenen Koerpers. Psychol Forsch 2 (1922) 303-318
105. Poizner H., Bellugi U., and Lutes-Driscoll V. Perception of American sign language in dynamic point-light displays. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 7 2 (1981) 430-440
106. Prasad, S., & Shiffrar, M. (2009). Viewpoint and the recognition of people from their movements. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 35(1), 39-49. doi:10.1037/a0012728.
107. Price, E. H. (2006). A critical review of congenital phantom limb cases and a developmental theory for the basis of body image. Consciousness and Cognition, 15(2), 310-322. doi:10.1016/j.concog.2005.07.003.
108. Prinz W. Perception and action planning. European Journal of Cognitive Psychology 9 (1997) 129-154
109. Prinz W. What re-enactment earns us. Cortex; a Journal Devoted to the Study of the Nervous System and Behavior 42 4 (2006) 515-517
110. Ramachandran, V. S., & Hirstein, W. (1998). The perception of phantom limbs. The D. O. Hebb lecture. Brain, 121(9), 1603-1630. doi:10.1093/brain/121.9.1603.
111. Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Grubb, J. D., & McGoldrick, J. E. (2006). Turning configural processing upside down: Part and whole body postures. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance, 32(1), 73-87. doi:10.1037/0096-1523.32.1.73.
112. Reed, C. L., Stone, V. E., Bozova, S., & Tanaka, J. (2003). The body-inversion effect. Psychological Science, 14(4), 302-308. doi:10.1111/1467-9280.14431.
113. Rizzolatti G., Fogassi L., and Gallese V. Neurophysiological mechanisms underlying the understanding and imitation of action. Nature Reviews. Neuroscience 2 9 (2001) 661-670
114. Robinson R.O., Lippold T., and Land R. Body schema: Does it depend on bodily-derived sensations?. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology 28 1 (1986) 49-52
115. Rumiati, R.I., Papeo, L., & Corradi-Dell'Acqua, C. (in press). Higher-level motor processes. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences.
116. Runeson S., and Frykholm G. Visual perception of lifted weight. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 7 4 (1981) 733-740
117. Schütz-Bosbach, S., & Prinz, W. (2007). Perceptual resonance: Action-induced modulation of perception. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11(8), 349-355. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2007.06.005.
118. Schwoebel, J., & Coslett, H. B. (2005). Evidence for multiple, distinct representations of the human body. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 17(4), 543-553. doi:10.1162/0898929053467587.
119. Schwoebel J., Coslett H.B., Bradt J., Friedman R., and Dileo C. Pain and the body schema: Effects of pain severity on mental representations of movement. Neurology 59 5 (2002) 775-777
120. Schwoebel J., Friedman R., Duda N., and Coslett H.B. Pain and the body schema: Evidence for peripheral effects on mental representations of movement. Brain: A Journal of Neurology 124 Pt 10 (2001) 2098-2104
121. Shepard R.N., and Metzler J. Mental rotation of three-dimensional objects. Science (New York, N.Y.) 171 972 (1971) 701-703
122. Shiffrar M., and Freyd J.J. Apparent motion of the human body. Psychological Science 1 4 (1990) 257-264
123. Simon J.R. Reactions toward the source of stimulation. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 1 (1969) 174-176
124. Sirigu, A., & Duhamel, J. R. (2001). Motor and visual imagery as two complementary but neurally dissociable mental processes. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 13(7), 910-919. doi:10.1162/089892901753165827.
125. Sirigu, A., Grafman, J., Bressler, K., & Sunderland, T. (1991). Multiple representations contribute to body knowledge processing: Evidence from a case of autotopagnosia. Brain, 114(1), 629-642. doi:10.1093/brain/114.1.629.
126. Slaughter, V., & Heron, M. (2004). Origins and early development of human body knowledge. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 69(2), vii, 1-102. doi:10.1111/j.0037-976X.2004.00286.x.
127. Slaughter V., Heron M., and Sim S. Development of preferences for the human body shape in infancy. Cognition 85 3 (2002) B71-81
128. Stevens J.A., Fonlupt P., Shiffrar M., and Decety J. New aspects of motion perception: Selective neural encoding of apparent human movements. Neuroreport 11 1 (2000) 109-115
129. Stoeckel, M. C., Jörgens, S., Witte, O. W., & Seitz, R. J. (2005). Reduced somatosensory hand representation in thalidomide-induced dysmelia as revealed by fMRI. The European Journal of Neuroscience, 21(2), 556-562. doi:10.1111/j.1460-9568.2005.03866.x.
130. Tanaka J., and Farah M.J. Parts and wholes in face recognition. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology. A, Human Experimental Psychology 46 2 (1993) 225-245
131. Tessari, A., Ottoboni, G., & Bazzarin, V. (2007). Is sidedness influenced by action directionality? In S. Vosniadou, D. Kayser, & A. Protopapas (Cur.), Proceedings of the European Cognitive Science Conference 2007 (pp. 545-549). London, UK: Taylor and Francis.
132. Tessari, A., Ottoboni, G., Symes, E., & Cubelli, R. (2009). Hand recognition depends on the implicit access to a spatially and structurally configured representation of the body, this issue.
133. Tessari, A., & Sirigu, A. (2008). Deficits of the Structural Description of the Body in patients with congenital limb deletion. Presented at the XXVI European Workshop on Cognitive Neuropsychology, Brixen, Italy.
134. Tomasino, B., & Rumiati, R. I. (2004). Effects of strategies on mental rotation and hemispheric lateralization: Neuropsychological evidence. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(5), 878-888. doi:15200714.
135. Urgesi C., Calvo-Merino B., Haggard P., and Aglioti S.M. Transcranial magnetic stimulation reveals two cortical pathways for visual body processing. The Journal of Neuroscience: The Official Journal of the Society for Neuroscience 27 30 (2007) 8023-8030
136. Viviani P., and Aymoz C. Colour, form, and movement are not perceived simultaneously. Vision Research 41 22 (2001) 2909-2918
137. Viviani P., and Stucchi N. Biological movements look uniform: Evidence of motor-perceptual interactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human Perception and Performance 18 3 (1992) 603-623
138. Weininger O., Rotenberg G., and Henry A. Body image of handicapped children. Journal of Personality Assessment 36 3 (1972) 248-253
139. Wertheimer M. Experimentelle stuidien uber das Sehen con Beuegung. Zeitschrift fuer Psychologie 61 (1912) 161-265
140. Willems, R. M., & Hagoort, P. (2007). Neural evidence for the interplay between language, gesture, and action: A review. Brain and Language, 101(3), 278-289. doi:10.1016/j.bandl.2007.03.004.
141. Wilson, M., & Knoblich, G. (2005). The case for motor involvement in perceiving conspecifics. Psychological Bulletin, 131(3), 460-473. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.131.3.460.
142. Wolpert D.M. Computational approaches to motor control. Trends in Cognitive Sciences 1 6 (1997) 209-216
143. Wolpert, D. M., Doya, K., & Kawato, M. (2003). A unifying computational framework for motor control and social interaction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 358(1431), 593-602. doi:10.1098/rstb.2002.1238.
144. Wolpert, D. M., Goodbody, S. J., & Husain, M. (1998). Maintaining internal representations: The role of the human superior parietal lobe. Nature Neuroscience, 1(6), 529-533. doi:10.1038/2245.
145. Yin R.K. Looking at upside-down faces. Journal of Experimental Psychology 81 1 (1969) 141-145